Re: Unintended (negative) consequences of UK gun control

2004-04-03 Thread Tim Lambert
Joseph E. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Britain has a hot burglary rate (occupied dwellings) many (8 ? ) times that of the USA. A federal Dept. of Justice study determined that the cause was the fact that American burglars (who don't fear the police and courts any more than British

Re: Unintended (negative) consequences of UK gun control

2004-04-03 Thread Tim Lambert
Joseph E. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Wright and Rossi, Armed and Considered Dangerous: A Survey of Felons and Their Firearms (New York, 1986). Britain has a hot burglary rate (occupied dwellings) many (8 ? ) times that of the USA. A federal Dept. of Justice study determined that the

Re: Unintended (negative) consequences of UK gun control

2004-04-13 Thread Tim Lambert
Phil Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lambert's case, as illustrated in his 3 points below, illustrates an approach he regularly argues which I'll call the tobacco company defense. The argument, which has valid elements, is that correlation between events (smoking and cancer, hot burglary rates

Mauser calls a decrease a horrifying increase

2004-06-30 Thread Tim Lambert
In a letter to the National Post, Gary Mauser claims that It should not surprise many people that Canada's gun laws have not worked (More Gun Control Isn't The Answer, John R. Lott Jr., June 15). Anyone living in a big Canadian city has witnessed the horrifying increase in violent crime

Re: Mauser calls a decrease a horrifying increase

2004-06-30 Thread Tim Lambert
Guy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, if you examine a graph of Canada's violent crime rate: http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~lambert/cgi-bin/blog/2004/06#mauser you will see that it has decreased over the past decade. And Mauser cannot claim to be unaware of this since the graph comes

Re: Mauser calls a decrease a horrifying increase

2004-06-30 Thread Tim Lambert
Philip F. Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And there are some shifts in perspective by Mr. Lambert in his reactions to Lott/Mauser that are suspect. For example, Mr. Lambert attacks Lott/Mauser's comment about increasing violence in Canadian cities by shifting to overall Canadian violence

Re: Mauser calls a decrease a horrifying increase

2004-07-01 Thread Tim Lambert
John M. Maraldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Isn't the issue, not whether we should prefer to live in Canada, but whether gun control reduces violence. eh? My statement was about whether you should prefer lower violent crime rates to higher violent crime rates. Whether gun control reduces

Re: [inbox] Self-defence in Britain

2004-07-27 Thread Tim Lambert
Clayton E. Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Original Message - From: Tim Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the light of claims that self-defence is now illegal in Britain, readers might be interested in my post at http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~lambert/cgi-bin/blog/2004/07#gullible4 It's

That's it, I'm out of here

2004-08-01 Thread Tim Lambert
Mark Kleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I must say I find the whole tone of this thread rather shocking on a scholarly list.  Some people are married to the idea that gun controls cause crime.  The UK instituted gun controls, and crime fell, according to the best evidence we have.  Instead of