Re: [Firebird-devel] FB3.0 How to get UDRs working?

2014-06-30 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
On 30/06/2014 08:35, Robbert-Jan wrote: (4) I’ve made a directory C:\Program Files\Firebird\Firebird_3_0\plugins\udr with the file UdrCppExample.cpp (from the latest snapshot). You should put DLL file, not source file there! Adriano

[Firebird-devel] GetPlugins() and failed plugin

2014-06-30 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
Hello, All. Can GetPlugins() throw an exception if any of configured plugins failed to load? -- WBR, SD. -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business

[Firebird-devel] RDB$MAP_TO_TYPE in RDB$TYPES

2014-06-30 Thread Simonov Denis
Field RDB$MAP_TO_TYPE of tables RDB$AUTH_MAPPING and SEC$GLOBAL_AUTH_MAPPING is not present in RDB$TYPES. Or am I bad looking and what I do not understand? -- Simonov Denis -- Open source business process

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$MAP_TO_TYPE in RDB$TYPES

2014-06-30 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 06/30/14 16:56, Simonov Denis wrote: Field RDB$MAP_TO_TYPE of tables RDB$AUTH_MAPPING and SEC$GLOBAL_AUTH_MAPPING is not present in RDB$TYPES. Or am I bad looking and what I do not understand? It's really missing in them. Please add a ticket to the tracker.

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$MAP_TO_TYPE in RDB$TYPES

2014-06-30 Thread Simonov Denis
Alex Peshkoff peshk...@mail.ru писал(а) в своём письме Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:06:25 +0400: On 06/30/14 16:56, Simonov Denis wrote: Field RDB$MAP_TO_TYPE of tables RDB$AUTH_MAPPING and SEC$GLOBAL_AUTH_MAPPING is not present in RDB$TYPES. Or am I bad looking and what I do not understand? It's

[Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-4477) Field RDB$MAP_TO_TYPE is not present in RDB$TYPES

2014-06-30 Thread Simonov Denis (JIRA)
Field RDB$MAP_TO_TYPE is not present in RDB$TYPES - Key: CORE-4477 URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4477 Project: Firebird Core Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 3.0 Alpha 2

Re: [Firebird-devel] GetPlugins() and failed plugin

2014-06-30 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 06/30/14 16:46, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: Hello, All. Can GetPlugins() throw an exception if any of configured plugins failed to load? No, it was as designed from the beginning that missing plugins should be ignored.

Re: [Firebird-devel] GetPlugins() and failed plugin

2014-06-30 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 06/30/14 17:40, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: 30.06.2014 15:17, Alex Peshkoff wrote: On 06/30/14 16:46, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: Can GetPlugins() throw an exception if any of configured plugins failed to load? No, it was as designed from the beginning that missing plugins should be

Re: [Firebird-devel] GetPlugins() and failed plugin

2014-06-30 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
30.06.2014 15:17, Alex Peshkoff wrote: On 06/30/14 16:46, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: Can GetPlugins() throw an exception if any of configured plugins failed to load? No, it was as designed from the beginning that missing plugins should be ignored. It makes issues with plugins harder

Re: [Firebird-devel] GetPlugins() and failed plugin

2014-06-30 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
30.06.2014 15:44, Alex Peshkoff wrote: On 06/30/14 17:40, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: It makes issues with plugins harder to detect and diagnose. Yes, but the reason was also rather strong - make it possible for firebird to work in server, client embedded modes with same default

[Firebird-devel] IPluginModule

2014-06-30 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
Hello, All. Currently function getMogule() and IPluginModule itself is never used in code. May be it is not too late yet to kill the call and the class to decrease complexity of third-party plugin development?.. -- WBR, SD.

[Firebird-devel] When is unlocked an stored procedure in use

2014-06-30 Thread Jesus Garcia
Firebird 2.5.2 classic server I'm experiencing one problem when trying to recompile stored procedures. Once I use one stored procedure from my application (that is not called from triggers and other procedures), the only way to recompile the procedure is to close user session. I understand that

[Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-4478) No feedback from a provider failed to load

2014-06-30 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov (JIRA)
No feedback from a provider failed to load -- Key: CORE-4478 URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4478 Project: Firebird Core Issue Type: Bug Components: Engine Affects

Re: [Firebird-devel] When is unlocked an stored procedure in use

2014-06-30 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
30.06.2014 20:12, Jesus Garcia wrote: I'm experiencing one problem when trying to recompile stored procedures. Once I use one stored procedure from my application (that is not called from triggers and other procedures), the only way to recompile the procedure is to close user session. I

Re: [Firebird-devel] When is unlocked an stored procedure in use

2014-06-30 Thread Jesus Garcia
Thank you, i'll test it. But why If nobody is using it and it does not apear in mon$statements the object is in use? Jesus Angel Garcia Zarco Cointec -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and

Re: [Firebird-devel] When is unlocked an stored procedure in use

2014-06-30 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
30.06.2014 22:37, Jesus Garcia wrote: But why If nobody is using it and it does not apear in mon$statements the object is in use? Because metadata locks are cached even if not explicitly used (to avoid repeating acquire/release overhead). Dmitry

Re: [Firebird-devel] When is unlocked an stored procedure in use

2014-06-30 Thread Jesus Garcia
But why If nobody is using it and it does not apear in mon$statements the object is in use? Because metadata locks are cached even if not explicitly used (to avoid repeating acquire/release overhead). Dmitry Thank you dimitry for the explanation. Then locks for triggers are

Re: [Firebird-devel] When is unlocked an stored procedure in use

2014-06-30 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
30.06.2014 23:16, Jesus Garcia wrote: Then locks for triggers are different from locks from procedures, and both are metadata locks. I can alter triggers with nowait but no procedures. Triggers are bound to the cached tables, they're not locked separately. Dmitry