In ddl.txt wrote
...
4) Allow comments in database objects.
(Claudio Valderrama C.)
Proposed syntax for testing:
COMMENT ON DATABASE IS {'txt'|NULL};
COMMENT ON basic_type name IS {'txt'|NULL};
COMMENT ON COLUMN table_or_view_name.field_name IS {'txt'|NULL};
COMMENT ON {PROCEDURE |
On 28/07/2014 10:58, Simonov Denis wrote:
In ddl.txt wrote
Ok. Thanks.
Adriano
--
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls.
Build a
I wonder - is there anyway via sql to get access to the comments other than
via the system tables?
Shouldn't there be something like a DESCRIBE statement as a corollary to
COMMENT ON?
A DESCRIBE DDL or DESCRIBE DEPENDENCIES giving a standard tool via sql for
database developers would be perfect
that is isql only - try it in any other tool.
On 28 July 2014 12:12, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes adrian...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 28/07/2014 12:08, Dalton Calford wrote:
I wonder - is there anyway via sql to get access to the comments other
than via the system tables?
show comments?
On 28/07/2014 13:40, Dalton Calford wrote:
that is isql only - try it in any other tool.
Show me where is such type of command in the SQL standard, or I will be
against it. Not because I think everything should be in the standard,
but because I think it would be artificial.
The only thing
28.07.2014 20:57, Dalton Calford wrote:
Has any work been performed on implementing schema/synonyms/larger
object identifiers?
Nope, as far as I'm aware of. It was proposed for v4 but so far I don't
see anybody jumping in with lots of interest...
Dmitry
Title: Re: [Firebird-devel] COMMENT ON docs
So, let me understand this.
(a) the plan is to block/remove access to the system tables
Afaiu, you will not be able to change the system tables, but will still be able to access (read) them.
[]s
Carlos
http://www.firebirdnews.org
FireBase
28.07.2014 20:20, Dalton Calford wrote:
So, let me understand this.
(a) the plan is to block/remove access to the system tables
Write access, not read.
(b) functionality will not be added until it is in the sql standard, even
though we are
not implementing everything that is currently
28.07.2014 22:20, Dalton Calford wrote:
So, let me understand this.
(a) the plan is to block/remove access to the system tables
Wrong, at least in the short term. Currently we're trying to block
*write* access to the system tables, no more than that.
(b) functionality will not be added
28.07.2014 20:39, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
I don't
think you can have/use schemas without recompiling all those thousands
of existing applications and/or their underlying database connectivity
libraries.
It depends on what you have on mind saying can use schemas.
--
WBR, SD.
Hi Dmitry
On 28 July 2014 14:39, Dmitry Yemanov firebi...@yandex.ru wrote:
Yes, it's actively developed. No, it doesn't support schemas. I don't
think you can have/use schemas without recompiling all those thousands
of existing applications and/or their underlying database connectivity
11 matches
Mail list logo
