On 29/07/2021 19:07, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>
> Hmm... LTT is good to have, but... is it necessary here ?
> Is it possible to use RecordBuffer (and some kind of BufferedStream) for
> temporary storage ?
>
This is what I intent to use.
RecordBuffer for storage and kind of BufferedStream who
29.07.2021 22:06, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Hi!
As discussed in #6815 and have atomic RETURNING (records are first
changed, then returned) I'd want to implement local temporary tables,
initially only in BLR level.
I don't want to discuss user visible complete local temporary tables
Hi!
As discussed in #6815 and have atomic RETURNING (records are first
changed, then returned) I'd want to implement local temporary tables,
initially only in BLR level.
I don't want to discuss user visible complete local temporary tables
feature here, that will make #6815 stuck.
It will be
