On 03.09.2013 10:47, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 09/03/13 11:43, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
Hm, I had to run autoreconf etc. on it to build it on Ubuntu 8.04
Did you try with initial package or with one we have in the tree?
Must say I've generated configure myself (on fresh gentoo) cause
On 09/03/13 09:14, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
On 02.09.2013 17:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 09/02/13 16:06, marius adrian popa wrote:
libedit will be updated and patched for 2.5.x branch also ?
I ask this because in debian libedit2 i s already updated and it would
be nice if also in the
Am 03.09.2013 09:13, schrieb Michal Kubecek:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 07:14:45AM +0200, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
On 02.09.2013 17:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
I think that all distros, not debian only, support fresh editline
library. And (provided they build --with-sustem-editline, in which
Am 03.09.2013 09:08, schrieb Alex Peshkoff:
On 09/03/13 09:14, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
On 02.09.2013 17:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 09/02/13 16:06, marius adrian popa wrote:
libedit will be updated and patched for 2.5.x branch also ?
I ask this because in debian libedit2 i s already
On 09/03/13 11:34, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
Am 03.09.2013 09:13, schrieb Michal Kubecek:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 07:14:45AM +0200, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
On 02.09.2013 17:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
I think that all distros, not debian only, support fresh editline
library. And
On 09/03/13 11:43, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
Hm, I had to run autoreconf etc. on it to build it on Ubuntu 8.04
Did you try with initial package or with one we have in the tree?
Must say I've generated configure myself (on fresh gentoo) cause
Makefile.am was slightly modified - I've
Am 03.09.2013 10:02, schrieb Alex Peshkoff:
The main reason why do we include libedit at all is licensing
Yes we had a discussion on this topic with a debian maintainer back in
2002 when we had to replace calls to readline with editline.
- built
into all known to me distros libreadline (it's
Am 03.09.2013 10:47, schrieb Alex Peshkoff:
On 09/03/13 11:43, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
To be precise I'm not sure why did that guy need automake at all :-)
It's required only if one touch Makefile.am. For regular builds existing
in the tree configure is OK.
May be it's really not
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:02:51PM +0400, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
No matter of this licensing issue almost all (correct be if
I'm wrong) distros use --with-system-editline switch and distribute
firebird packages violating GPL.
It would be GPL violation if a distribution package
libedit will be updated and patched for 2.5.x branch also ?
I ask this because in debian libedit2 i s already updated and it would
be nice if also in the 2.5.x branch would be done so
http://packages.debian.org/sid/libedit2
On 09/02/13 16:06, marius adrian popa wrote:
libedit will be updated and patched for 2.5.x branch also ?
I ask this because in debian libedit2 i s already updated and it would
be nice if also in the 2.5.x branch would be done so
I think that all distros, not debian only, support fresh
On 02.09.2013 17:04, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 09/02/13 16:06, marius adrian popa wrote:
libedit will be updated and patched for 2.5.x branch also ?
I ask this because in debian libedit2 i s already updated and it would
be nice if also in the 2.5.x branch would be done so
I think that all
12 matches
Mail list logo
