On 03/21/12 17:22, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
Hello,
it seems I can't install SC of Firebird 3.0 as a service.
There is no appropriate .bat file for that. While I could create one or
take the one from 2.5, instsvc.exe in the 3.0 snapshot is out-dated, at
least according to the usage
Hi Alex,
it seems I can't install SC of Firebird 3.0 as a service.
There is no appropriate .bat file for that. While I could create one or
take the one from 2.5, instsvc.exe in the 3.0 snapshot is out-dated, at
least according to the usage information, as it doesn't support the
22.03.2012 12:29, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
= Does that mean: We have a single executable in Firebird 3. When -m is
used, this means a single server process and the SharedCache,
SharedDatabase parameters controll whether it's SS or SC. When -m is not
used, then it's one process per
22.03.2012 12:34, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Probably small change in help text - SS or SC - will be useful.
Before doing that, we need to decide whether the former SuperClassic
will be the documented option or just some internal stuff for easier
debugging etc, as FB3 is intended to make it mostly
On 03/22/12 12:29, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
= Does that mean: We have a single executable in Firebird 3. When -m is
used, this means a single server process and the SharedCache,
SharedDatabase parameters controll whether it's SS or SC. When -m is not
used, then it's one process per
22.03.2012 13:00, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
* Under the assumption that SS as a single-process model with it's
shared cache supports SMP (I think this was a primarly goal) in 3.0 like
SC in 2.5, I don't see a reason to offer SC in 3.0 at all (at least the
SC terminology; which already shows
Alex Peshkoff [2012-03-22 09:43] :
BTW, in posix things are even more funny. firebird executable detects,
is it started from shell (SS/SC) or from (x)inetd network listener (CS).
Therefore no switch -m is needed at all.
and in that case, what about systemd, where xinetd is no longer
something
On 03/22/12 13:13, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
22.03.2012 13:00, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
* Under the assumption that SS as a single-process model with it's
shared cache supports SMP (I think this was a primarly goal) in 3.0 like
SC in 2.5, I don't see a reason to offer SC in 3.0 at all (at least
On 03/22/12 13:48, philippe makowski wrote:
Alex Peshkoff [2012-03-22 09:43] :
BTW, in posix things are even more funny. firebird executable detects,
is it started from shell (SS/SC) or from (x)inetd network listener (CS).
Therefore no switch -m is needed at all.
and in that case, what
