[Firebird-devel] firebird.msg

2015-09-16 Thread Paul Reeves
I just noticed the size of firebird.msg in Fb 3 trunk - it seems to be around 550 Mb. In Fb 2.5 it is around 150 Mb and in the previous beta releases of Fb 3 it is also around 150Mb. What's happened? Paul -- Paul Reeves http://www.ibphoenix.com Supporting users of Firebird

Re: [Firebird-devel] firebird.msg

2015-09-16 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
16.09.2015 12:04, Paul Reeves пишет: > > I just noticed the size of firebird.msg in Fb 3 trunk - it seems to be around > 550 Mb. In Fb 2.5 it is around 150 Mb and in the previous beta releases of Fb > 3 it is also around 150Mb. You surely meant KB, not MB ;-) Just checked the last (tonight's)

Re: [Firebird-devel] firebird.msg

2015-09-16 Thread Paul Reeves
On Wednesday 16 September 2015 12:14:28 Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 16.09.2015 11:56, Vlad Khorsun wrote: > > Just run make_boot and newly generated firebird.msg have size 148104 > > bytes. > >May be Paul got French one in UTF-8?.. Definitely not French but UTF-8 did cross my mind. On the

Re: [Firebird-devel] firebird.msg

2015-09-16 Thread Paul Reeves
On Wednesday 16 September 2015 13:34:12 James Starkey wrote: > > > > > > You surely meant KB, not MB ;-) > > > > But hey, it was just an error of a single order of magnitude :-) > > > > > Uh, try three orders of magnitude. Even better that you're not a > government economist. Actually Jim, I

Re: [Firebird-devel] firebird.msg

2015-09-16 Thread Paul Reeves
On Wednesday 16 September 2015 11:35:02 Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 16.09.2015 12:04, Paul Reeves пишет: > > I just noticed the size of firebird.msg in Fb 3 trunk - it seems to be > > around 550 Mb. In Fb 2.5 it is around 150 Mb and in the previous beta > > releases of Fb 3 it is also around 150Mb. >

Re: [Firebird-devel] firebird.msg

2015-09-16 Thread Vlad Khorsun
16.09.2015 12:04, Paul Reeves wrote: > > I just noticed the size of firebird.msg in Fb 3 trunk - it seems to be around > 550 Mb. In Fb 2.5 it is around 150 Mb and in the previous beta releases of Fb > 3 it is also around 150Mb. > > What's happened? Just run make_boot and newly generated

Re: [Firebird-devel] firebird.msg

2015-09-16 Thread James Starkey
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Paul Reeves wrote: > On Wednesday 16 September 2015 11:35:02 Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > > 16.09.2015 12:04, Paul Reeves пишет: > > > I just noticed the size of firebird.msg in Fb 3 trunk - it seems to be > > > around 550 Mb. In Fb 2.5 it is

[Firebird-devel] Altering collation of field

2015-09-16 Thread Jiří Činčura
Hi *, there's currently no way of altering collation of field in 2.5.4, right? I checked all the possible documentation on firebirdsql.org and haven't found a way. So only system table modification seems to be an option. Let's have these two tables: create table parent ( id bigint not null,

Re: [Firebird-devel] firebird.msg

2015-09-16 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
16.09.2015 11:56, Vlad Khorsun wrote: > Just run make_boot and newly generated firebird.msg have size 148104 > bytes. May be Paul got French one in UTF-8?.. -- WBR, SD. -- Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure

Re: [Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-4936) Reduce internal contention in background garbage collector

2015-09-16 Thread Leyne, Sean
> Reduce internal contention in background garbage collector > -- > > Key: CORE-4936 > URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4936 > Project: Firebird Core > Issue Type:

Re: [Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-4935) Increase performance of backout of dead record version (or undo of just created primary record version) when backversions chain is too long

2015-09-16 Thread Vlad Khorsun
17.09.2015 1:13, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote: >> Key: CORE-4935 >> URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4935 >> Project: Firebird Core >> >> Another improvement is to cut and cleanup tail of the >> back-versions chain at point where it

[Firebird-devel] Firebird package updated in Debian with reproducible builds

2015-09-16 Thread marius adrian popa
This version will make the build reproducible. https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-firebird/2.5.git/commit/?id=c425202385f055bb9beb67fcc8a861cb29c38917 The reproducible builds initiative aims to enable anyone to reproduce bit by bit identical binary packages from a given source, thus enabling

[Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-4935) Increase performance of backout of dead record version (or undo of just created primary record version) when backversions chain is too long

2015-09-16 Thread Vlad Khorsun (JIRA)
Increase performance of backout of dead record version (or undo of just created primary record version) when backversions chain is too long ---

Re: [Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-4936) Reduce internal contention in background garbage collector

2015-09-16 Thread Vlad Khorsun
17.09.2015 0:20, Leyne, Sean wrote: > >> Reduce internal contention in background garbage collector >> -- >> >> Key: CORE-4936 >> URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4936 >>

Re: [Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-4935) Increase performance of backout of dead record version (or undo of just created primary record version) when backversions chain is too long

2015-09-16 Thread Claudio Valderrama C.
> Key: CORE-4935 > URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4935 > Project: Firebird Core > > Another improvement is to cut and cleanup tail of the > back-versions chain at point where it is legal Vlad, did you do that second improvement,

[Firebird-devel] RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS

2015-09-16 Thread Helen Borrie
The new FBLangref 25 says RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS is not used in current versions. As Mark R. has pointed in his review (and as I meant to ask before, and forgot to!) it clearly *is* used or, at least, populated when a view is created. What's the back-story? Helen

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS

2015-09-16 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
Em 16-09-2015 21:45, Helen Borrie escreveu: > The new FBLangref 25 says RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS is not used in current versions. > As Mark R. has pointed in his review (and as I meant to ask before, and > forgot to!) it clearly *is* used or, at least, populated when a view is > created. > > What's

Re: [Firebird-devel] RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS

2015-09-16 Thread Claudio Valderrama C.
> -Original Message- > From: Helen Borrie [mailto:hele...@tpg.com.au] > Sent: Miércoles, 16 de Septiembre de 2015 21:46 > > The new FBLangref 25 says RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS is not used in > current versions. As Mark R. has pointed in his review (and > as I meant to ask before, and forgot