I just noticed the size of firebird.msg in Fb 3 trunk - it seems to be around
550 Mb. In Fb 2.5 it is around 150 Mb and in the previous beta releases of Fb
3 it is also around 150Mb.
What's happened?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
16.09.2015 12:04, Paul Reeves пишет:
>
> I just noticed the size of firebird.msg in Fb 3 trunk - it seems to be around
> 550 Mb. In Fb 2.5 it is around 150 Mb and in the previous beta releases of Fb
> 3 it is also around 150Mb.
You surely meant KB, not MB ;-) Just checked the last (tonight's)
On Wednesday 16 September 2015 12:14:28 Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 16.09.2015 11:56, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> > Just run make_boot and newly generated firebird.msg have size 148104
> > bytes.
>
>May be Paul got French one in UTF-8?..
Definitely not French but UTF-8 did cross my mind. On the
On Wednesday 16 September 2015 13:34:12 James Starkey wrote:
> > >
> > > You surely meant KB, not MB ;-)
> >
> > But hey, it was just an error of a single order of magnitude :-)
> >
> >
> Uh, try three orders of magnitude. Even better that you're not a
> government economist.
Actually Jim, I
On Wednesday 16 September 2015 11:35:02 Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 16.09.2015 12:04, Paul Reeves пишет:
> > I just noticed the size of firebird.msg in Fb 3 trunk - it seems to be
> > around 550 Mb. In Fb 2.5 it is around 150 Mb and in the previous beta
> > releases of Fb 3 it is also around 150Mb.
>
16.09.2015 12:04, Paul Reeves wrote:
>
> I just noticed the size of firebird.msg in Fb 3 trunk - it seems to be around
> 550 Mb. In Fb 2.5 it is around 150 Mb and in the previous beta releases of Fb
> 3 it is also around 150Mb.
>
> What's happened?
Just run make_boot and newly generated
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Paul Reeves wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 September 2015 11:35:02 Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> > 16.09.2015 12:04, Paul Reeves пишет:
> > > I just noticed the size of firebird.msg in Fb 3 trunk - it seems to be
> > > around 550 Mb. In Fb 2.5 it is
Hi *,
there's currently no way of altering collation of field in 2.5.4, right?
I checked all the possible documentation on firebirdsql.org and haven't
found a way. So only system table modification seems to be an option.
Let's have these two tables:
create table parent (
id bigint not null,
16.09.2015 11:56, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> Just run make_boot and newly generated firebird.msg have size 148104
> bytes.
May be Paul got French one in UTF-8?..
--
WBR, SD.
--
Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure
> Reduce internal contention in background garbage collector
> --
>
> Key: CORE-4936
> URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4936
> Project: Firebird Core
> Issue Type:
17.09.2015 1:13, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
>> Key: CORE-4935
>> URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4935
>> Project: Firebird Core
>>
>> Another improvement is to cut and cleanup tail of the
>> back-versions chain at point where it
This version will make the build reproducible.
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-firebird/2.5.git/commit/?id=c425202385f055bb9beb67fcc8a861cb29c38917
The reproducible builds initiative aims to enable anyone to reproduce bit
by bit identical binary packages from a given source, thus enabling
Increase performance of backout of dead record version (or undo of just created
primary record version) when backversions chain is too long
---
17.09.2015 0:20, Leyne, Sean wrote:
>
>> Reduce internal contention in background garbage collector
>> --
>>
>> Key: CORE-4936
>> URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4936
>>
> Key: CORE-4935
> URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4935
> Project: Firebird Core
>
> Another improvement is to cut and cleanup tail of the
> back-versions chain at point where it is legal
Vlad,
did you do that second improvement,
The new FBLangref 25 says RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS is not used in current versions.
As Mark R. has pointed in his review (and as I meant to ask before, and forgot
to!) it clearly *is* used or, at least, populated when a view is created.
What's the back-story?
Helen
Em 16-09-2015 21:45, Helen Borrie escreveu:
> The new FBLangref 25 says RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS is not used in current versions.
> As Mark R. has pointed in his review (and as I meant to ask before, and
> forgot to!) it clearly *is* used or, at least, populated when a view is
> created.
>
> What's
> -Original Message-
> From: Helen Borrie [mailto:hele...@tpg.com.au]
> Sent: Miércoles, 16 de Septiembre de 2015 21:46
>
> The new FBLangref 25 says RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS is not used in
> current versions. As Mark R. has pointed in his review (and
> as I meant to ask before, and forgot
18 matches
Mail list logo