> The trick words is how to shortly tell this "the snapshot used to start
> transaction ".
>
> And it's even more trick when we think about commit retaining.
>
> My understand is that if transaction had a commit retaining, subsequent
> new derived transactions will use the snapshot after the
Alex, Pavel,
Isn't this misleading?
Seems these RDB$TYPES entries should be DECLFLOAT, not DECIMAL.
Adriano
PS: I still do not receive Alex responses. :(
Forwarded Message
Subject:[Firebird-checkins] SF.net SVN: firebird:[63716]
On 10/05/2017 16:01, Leyne, Sean wrote:
>> "Starting from"?
> That would be misleading, the connection would not be able to see commits
> from later transactions, which is certainly not the case.
>
>
The trick words is how to shortly tell this "the snapshot used to start
transaction ".
And it's
On 05/11/17 15:06, Jiří Činčura wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> getting all object types from RDB$TYPES in Firebird 3.0.2 gives me 0-19
> values. But in obj.h I see
>
.
> Why the 20-32 isn't there?
>
Because that's not real objects - they just need to be in same digits
space to ensure correct
Hi *,
getting all object types from RDB$TYPES in Firebird 3.0.2 gives me 0-19
values. But in obj.h I see
const int obj_relation = 0;
const int obj_view = 1;
const int obj_trigger = 2;
const int obj_computed = 3;
Garbage value in RDB$FIELD_SUB_TYPE in RDB$FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS after altering
function
-
Key: CORE-5535
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5535
Project:
