> The trick words is how to shortly tell this "the snapshot used to start > transaction <n>". > > And it's even more trick when we think about commit retaining. >
> My understand is that if transaction <n> had a commit retaining, subsequent > new derived transactions will use the snapshot after the commit retaining in > <n>. > > However, a already established derived transaction from <n> will ignore > subsequent commit retaining done in <n>. IMO, nothing says that we need to support all transaction 'modes' with this feature -- nor should we. Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
