01.09.2014 13:50, James Starkey wrote:
Selecting the source without the key would return hex or base64 gook. With
the key, the
procedure source.
What will happen if the key is wrong?
What to do if the engine have to read the field for internal needs? For
example, how to
execute a
01.09.2014 16:01, Geoff Worboys wrote:
At this late stage of v3.0, it seems to me that simple and
least possible change (to v3 and to the developer) should
be high on the list of priorities. More sophisticated
options could be assessed in detail later.
Exactly for this reasons the option
01.09.2014 16:14, Jim Starkey wrote:
No, that's not even close to true. If the only fields encypted were the
procedure and trigger source blobs, nothing would be inaccessible without the
key except those blobs.
Obviously you disagree. Please explain your logic.
I'm still thinking
01.09.2014 16:35, Geoff Worboys wrote:
The more Firebird does this, the
more of a reputation it will get for leaving users behind, and
the less users will be inclined stay with or come to Firebird.
It may sound scary, but... what other option do they really have?.. Oracle?
PG? MySQL?..
01.09.2014 16:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
And you think that is not an option?
Yep.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web
01.09.2014 17:10, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
These vendors are too lazy to convert their PSQL routines into UDRs.
BTW, Adriano had no problem with IDL - C++/FPC translation. I'm sure he can
make PSQL
- C++/FPC translator as well to offer them a help in securing their precious
code
01.09.2014 18:12, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
How many $$ are you going to paying me?
Nothing: I'm proud of my PSQL sources and have to will to hide them. Ask
those Brazil
guys Carlos was referring to.
--
WBR, SD.
01.09.2014 18:14, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Nothing: I'm proud of my PSQL sources and have to will to hide them.
It should be read as I have NO wish to hide them.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Slashdot TV.
Video
01.09.2014 20:58, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
Relaxed write restriction for rdb$source is probably even easier to
implement.
But it requires a quite complex condition, no? Not just if relation is
system one,
throw exception, but if relation is system one, but not this and that, throw
exception.
01.09.2014 21:35, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
Complex condition is: relation is X and no other field but rdb$source is
modified. We already have function in VIO doing such a check for other
purposes.
You are not going to simplify code, are you?..
--
WBR, SD.
Hi, All.
When was decided that one-line blocks must not be enclosed with parentheses?
It is a
rather dangerous style...
--
WBR, SD.
--
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
02.09.2014 16:43, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
It's not, it was not and it will never be a dangerous style.
Everything is dangerous if you write code without attention.
For me it looks like code obfuscation. May be harmless, but unpleasant.
--
WBR, SD.
02.09.2014 17:00, James Starkey wrote:
Mandatory indentation makes it clear.
No. With tabstop == 4, it is placed exactly under if's condition, pretending
to be
condition's continuation:
if (some condition
some other condition)
hardly recognized line that doing
02.09.2014 19:08, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
This example violates the project coding style.
Oh, yes. But
if (temp.rpb_flags rpb_delta)
temp.rpb_prior = data;
doesn't look much better.
--
WBR, SD.
--
04.09.2014 16:49, Dalton Calford wrote:
So, DDL statements such as GRANT VIEW which is used by MS SQL for metadata
security could
be applied to FB.
No, they couldn't unless Firebird is run in controlled environment which is
not the
case of topic starter.
--
WBR, SD.
Hi, All.
I see that flag large scan is set for blob reading only if reader is gbak
or size of
blob is bigger than page cache.
Doesn't it mean that reading of BLOB that is little smaller than page cache
will flush
whole shared cache out?
--
WBR, SD.
08.09.2014 8:37, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Corresponding number of LRU pages will be evicted, yes.
I cannot imagine an application pattern that read the same BLOB repeatedly.
Can you?
May be it has sense to cache only BLOB pointer pages, but not data to
prevent
performance penalty for
21.09.2014 16:44, Philippe Makowski wrote:
Unfortunately, seems that it is only reliable solution under MacOsX
May be you could ask ICU group devs about their attitude to MacOSX port? I
see there is
no official OSX binary download at their web-site though it is listed as a
supported OS.
24.09.2014 10:44, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Maybe we can investigate how are they doing it and how reliable it is and
what are the gotchas.
For the beginning it would be enough what it is good for. The post is
describing
how but say no word about why.
--
WBR, SD.
24.09.2014 14:58, marius adrian popa wrote:
The why is explained by users , There are a lot of nas/raid devices that can
be used for
db storage also for clustering (cold standby)
I bet that it is much easier to find NAS which support iSCSI or NFS. Do you
know a
popular SMB-only NAS
25.09.2014 18:25, Leyne, Sean wrote:
I am not aware of SQL Server running on SMB anything other than SMB v3. It
would be far too dangerous.
If a server supports SMB3, it means that it has Windows inside, because
Samba doesn't
support SMB3 yet. So, I wonder what can preventing anyone from
25.09.2014 21:27, Leyne, Sean wrote:
Having a SQL/FB running in VM on a HA VM cluster connected to HA disk storage
cluster provides a high level of resiliency, with multiple failures necessary
in order for functionality to be lost.
I wonder how they manage synchronization between nodes in
25.09.2014 21:27, Leyne, Sean wrote:
Installing on physical server means that you have a single point of failure.
Modern storage systems claim that they have no single point of failure, BTW.
Some of
them even allows two or more servers to be attached.
But all this is pointless because
25.09.2014 21:58, Leyne, Sean wrote:
All changes are written to disk first
Which one in, say, ten nodes cluster?
Further, all that is required for a write operation is to send a message
which invalidates the cache object when the write happens. The propogation
of the changed data can
25.09.2014 21:58, Leyne, Sean wrote:
Your posts suggest that you have fundamental (almost philosophical) problems
with the idea of using SMB v3 storage for FB purposes.
I have one fundamental problem indeed: I know what clusters can do and what
they
cannot. Unfortunately, they have no
26.09.2014 18:11, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
0x40 = 64, you're basically sayg c = 64, why do you think it should not
be converted to '64' ?
Perhaps, because it is a binary blob, not text one.
--
WBR, SD.
03.10.2014 18:27, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote:
Could the client be buggy in receiving data?
Not touching data buffer if value is null is a right thing.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance
06.10.2014 11:34, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote:
Any clue?
Add -user SYSDBA
--
WBR, SD.
--
Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
Hello, All.
Is following warning safe?
Generating parse.cpp and dsql.tab.h
warning - the symbol db_ddl_privilege is undefined
C:\Users\SD\MYDOCU~1\firebird\temp\Win32\debug\btyacc\btyacc: 2 rules never
reduced
--
WBR, SD.
09.10.2014 17:24, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 09/10/2014 10:34, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote:
You could use FIELD_NAME, for backwards compatibility, but also add a
child object type column, for the package extension to distinguish between
functions/procedures/future
Hello, All.
I wonder why in new CLOOP interfaces versions are declared as simple
constants instead
of something like VERSION = inherited::VERSION + 3?..
--
WBR, SD.
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance
10.10.2014 18:08, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
In this used way, if you extend a base interface, it will change various
lines of the output file and you will notice reviewing the changes
before commit.
Why would someone commit generated files?..
--
WBR, SD.
11.10.2014 16:43, peshk...@mail.ru wrote:
You are right - we will not commit generated by cloop files when everything
gets stable.
But .idl files should be committed.
Do I understand right, that CLOOP will generate VERSION constant for each
class
definition automatically?
--
WBR,
Hello, All.
What class can be used to get IConfig interface for a config file with a
given name and
path?
--
WBR, SD.
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get
Hello, All.
interface.h doesn't need to include ibase.h. Actually, this include is
causing troubles
for compiling some third-party applications.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
15.10.2014 14:41, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
interface.h doesn't need to include ibase.h. Actually, this include is
causing troubles
for compiling some third-party applications.
BTW, did you try to compile interface.h without including Firebird.h at all
in a
project that really does
15.10.2014 16:26, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Interface.h uses legacy structs, so it should include ibase.h.
types_pub.h is enough. It does not need old API function prototypes.
I compile fbstuff including Interface.h (from the FB compiled source,
not from a installation).
Did
15.10.2014 16:51, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
types_pub.h does not exist in an installation, it's merged in ibase.h.
A strange thing: I was sure that I registered request to distribute separate
headers
instead on merged one in the tracker, but now I can't find it. Perhaps, I
should
15.10.2014 17:00, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
If you include_internal_ firebird file fb_types.h that's rather
expected result.
No. I included RefCounted.h to save time reinventing RefPtr template, but it
had
completely contrary result. My fault. :(
--
WBR, SD.
15.10.2014 23:35, Philippe Makowski wrote:
marius adrian popa a écrit le 2014-10-15 18:08 :
RHEL-6 will be supported it should be an yes in that table with 2.12
nope, too old kernel 2.6.32
But Alex doesn't remember exactly if kernel 2.6.32 has the bug he talked
about.
Besides, it is
27.10.2014 11:10, Wodzu wrote:
Is it connected to this issue
perhaps?http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3826
No, it is connected to this issue:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=26593 which
makes FPC to produce wrong assemble code for 64 bits versions.
--
WBR, SD.
27.10.2014 12:50, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote:
What now? Same issue as above: multiple instances is supported, so why this
warning?
Multiple instances are supposed to be supported, but actually they aren't.
--
WBR, SD.
27.10.2014 15:04, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote:
Just a note: MySQL allows this, it allows you to define service name, port,
a few configuration options etc.
Could you describe what are instances good for generally?
I know that in Oracle they are used to bypass limitation one
28.10.2014 9:34, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
Any RDBMS is first of all about
consistency and only then about performance.
Oracle?.. Their invalid DB objects aren't about consistency even in the
smallest.
--
WBR, SD.
28.10.2014 11:35, Michal Kubecek wrote:
I like that idea. I think it is possible, just by setting the
$FIREBIRD variable for each instance - the server will look there for
things like fb.conf etc. And there are also vars for placing the lock
manager and message file. Something else to add to
28.10.2014 12:32, Michal Kubecek wrote:
at the moment one starts multiple server instances, either each with
a different value of FIREBIRD variable or with different arguments to -e,
-el and -em options.
How? Windoes Service manager doesn't llow to set environment variable for a
service.
28.10.2014 15:50, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
That is, is it possible to use a secondary security database for multiple
normal
databases?
Yes.
It was designed to be so from the beginning of FB3, but there was a bug
which actively showed itself just after adding users' mapping.
It is pity that
28.10.2014 16:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
This requires small fix in code processing isc_info_svc_user_dbpath
(make it depend upon isc_spb_expected_db).
Will it break possibility to get security database patch without connecting
to a
database? I mean that existing applications that manage
28.10.2014 17:19, Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions) wrote:
And other non default would be a few databases using a single secondary
security database?
There is no such thing as a secondary security database.
--
WBR, SD.
28.10.2014 17:27, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
Other = everything neither self nor security3.fdb.
BTW, what declaration of security.fdb in default databases.conf is for?
--
WBR, SD.
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web
28.10.2014 17:34, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
BTW, what declaration of security.fdb in default databases.conf is
for?
To make it use small cache (saves memory when default one is big) and
avoid remote connections to it.
Why it is security.fdb, not security3.fdb then?..
--
WBR, SD.
28.10.2014 17:48, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Should be:
security.db = $(dir_secDb)/security3.fdb
I wonder why it isn't security3.fdb = $(dir_secDb)/security3.fdb.
At first I though that you changed hardcoded security DB name and this is
the way to be
backward compatible...
--
WBR, SD.
Hello, All.
Could someone explain meaning of each of the values?
enum req_s {
req_evaluate,
req_return,
req_receive,
req_send,
req_proceed,
req_sync,
req_unwind
};
--
WBR, SD.
Hello, All.
I wonder if SQL standard says something about syntax of transaction's option
for
disabling replication of changes made by this transaction?
--
WBR, SD.
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web
06.11.2014 19:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I don't really understand why you would want to disable replication for
a single transaction.
There may be a number of reason. The main one is that this transaction is
performed by
replicator and I don't want changes to be bounced back in
Hello, All.
I've changed parse.y with attached diff, but even after clean full rebuild isql shows
me this error:
SQL set transaction no replication;
Commit current transaction (y/n)?n
Rolling back work.
Statement failed, SQLSTATE = 42000
Dynamic SQL Error
-SQL error code = -104
-Token
07.11.2014 17:07, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Was not added it to keywords.cpp?
Yep, that is the trick. Thanks.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
07.11.2014 17:18, Leyne, Sean wrote:
Are you proposing to make this change (adding no replication syntax) to the
Firebird codebase?
So far it is a private fork. But, according to the IDPL license, you can
merge changed
sources to the main codebase if you wish as soon as they are
07.11.2014 19:58, Jim Starkey wrote:
Statement level multi-master replication is basically
impossible to get right, so you need to pick among a set of bad
options. There about a billion things that can go wrong (consider a
timestamp or random number generator, for example) that requires
08.11.2014 13:04, Frank Schlottmann-Gödde wrote:
What about setting a context variable telling your triggers to tag this
changes as log only.
There is no my triggers. And no replication TPB clumpet is exactly such
kind of
context variable on transaction level.
--
WBR, SD.
Hello, All.
How can I see the whole execution node tree for a query?
--
WBR, SD.
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
10.11.2014 16:20, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
As far as I remember we have a decision to have API/ODS fixed after
beta1 release.
Do you still consider your CLOOP API to be a public one in version 3?..
--
WBR, SD.
--
04.11.2014 18:56, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
req_proceed - initial state to execute the request, also used together
with req_sync to implement SUSPEND (nod_stall)
Could you provide a little more details about this process?..
--
WBR, SD.
After the last commit where has IAttachment disappeared to? Interface.h
refuses to
compile without it you know...
--
WBR, SD.
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
11.11.2014 16:12, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I Attachment does not disappeared and tree builds fine for me in Linux.
Where is it declared then? In IdlFbInterfaces.h there is no mention of it.
What are you talking about?
struct DtcStart
{
IAttachment* attachment;
11.11.2014 16:26, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Interface.h: typedef name::Attachment prefix##Attachment;
Ah, now I see #ifdef INCLUDE_Firebird_H // Building internal module.
Unfortunatelly,
I'm building _external_ module.
--
WBR, SD.
11.11.2014 16:26, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
If you're test tree with changes, I cannot say anything about.
But I hope that you can say something about what should be in #else branch
of the #ifdef.
--
WBR, SD.
11.11.2014 17:13, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I'm trying to figure out. Internals hacks (I typedefs, structs,
non-cloop classes) are not good for external usage yet.
Do you think about undoing your commit or adding an another layer of
macros?..
--
WBR, SD.
11.11.2014 17:23, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I do not think on undoing anything cause I was certainly that was going
to happen and so far Firebird tree builds.
If you want the old hacks masquerading problems, declare a policy and
use the macro that declare I classes. Or edit the
12.11.2014 10:56, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I included firebird.h (noted with FIXME) to work and they build for me.
In this case what is that ifdef for? Why not just remove it?..
--
WBR, SD.
--
12.11.2014 11:41, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Also, do you think that after added the policy code, that create a
policy and work*only with it* is ideal? That's what we're doing, do you
see it?
Actually, you obfuscated the code so well, that, I think, nobody can see
what you are
12.11.2014 11:41, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Also, do you think that after added the policy code, that create a
policy and work*only with it* is ideal? That's what we're doing, do you
see it?
Actually, you obfuscated the code so well, that, I think, nobody can see
what you are
So, when I'll be able to compile external modules without including half of
FB sources
into it?..
--
WBR, SD.
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted
13.11.2014 14:21, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
A lot of serious advantages without serious disadvantages.
A little external adapter between fixed PAC and CLOOP has them even more.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Comprehensive Server
13.11.2014 14:32, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
What do you mean by PAC here?
Pure Abstract Classes.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through
13.11.2014 14:48, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
I have no time for explaining PAC disadvantages once
more. It was already done it in a summer time.
Unfortunately, I have time to repeat:
A bug in FPC is not a disadvantage. The rest of problems came from
(pointless)
interface autoupgrade. Getting
13.11.2014 15:43, Leyne, Sean wrote:
If you need something that was idled/deprecated years ago, why are you
'blaming' Adriano for the fact that you will need to do work for your fork?
I'm blaming Adriano for the fact that he broke the interface which worked
just a week
ago and did it in a
17.11.2014 21:50, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
moving from Visual Studio 2010 to 2013 (or the upcoming
2015) might be something to consider for the near future.
On the other hand moving to GCC can make porting easier and reduce number of
cases when
development for one platform break build on
18.11.2014 13:18, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
You just don't understand. You understand nothing. It's difficult in
this way!
But there is no alternative.
Read the code! Read the archives!
I told you many times that your code is completely unreadable. Didn't you
listen?..
--
What's going on?
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable
to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator, root@localhost and inform them of
the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that
19.11.2014 13:12, Michal Kubecek wrote:
I guess there are three options:
Fourth option: add a setting to disable IPv6 support completely with value
true by
default. (Or option to enable IPv6 support with default value false.)
--
WBR, SD.
19.11.2014 13:30, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
It seems to be up from here.
Now it works for me as well. Perhaps, the server was overloaded.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT
20.11.2014 11:11, Michal Kubecek wrote:
I committed the fix now
Unfortunately EAI_ADDRFAMILY is not defined by MSVC.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate!
20.11.2014 11:11, Michal Kubecek wrote:
On systems without IPv6 support or with IPv6 disabled, the server should
start with default configuration (RemoteBindAddress not set) and listen
on 0.0.0.0 (IPv4 wildcard). On XP or older (not sure about 2003) with
IPv6 support, one will need
19.11.2014 15:08, Michal Kubecek wrote:
The reason for AF_INET6 is that a PF_INET6 socket bound to
:: can accept both IPv6 and IPv4 connections (as long as IPV6_V6ONLY is
0 and the system supports this setting) while a PF_INET socket can only
accept IPv4 connections. Therefore PF_INET6 should
21.11.2014 11:25, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Sorry, but this is bad code. It doesn't check for number of slots on PP
and allows
unlimited grow of ppg_min_space.
No, ppg_min_space cannot grow more than slot+1, exactly as it was in version
2.5.
Just imagine case when all slots on PP is
21.11.2014 12:55, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Could you show condition which stops loop in your patch in such case ?
You are right, I'm an idiot, who can mix up = and =.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type -
22.11.2014 11:14, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Use of providers is not limited to the three standard ones. Firebird 3
does not support pre-ODS 12 databases but Firebird 3 will have an
additional provider to access older databases (ODS 8 to 11.x).
Word will here must be replaced with may or can.
23.11.2014 18:19, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
I have no problems with mingw used for compilation, but why would one
prefer using the mingw-produced binaries to the MSVC-produced ones?
No dependency on C++ runtime and (by rumors) higher performance sometimes.
--
WBR, SD.
25.11.2014 12:03, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
I going to check and apply them.
I didn't notice among changed files ibsetjmp.h. Does this patch define
START/END_CHECK_FOR_EXCPTION() macros?
--
WBR, SD.
--
Download
25.11.2014 12:17, Alexpux wrote:
No, my patches not patch ibsetjmp.h. Will see it.
If MinGW really supports SEH, all you need is to remove !defined(MINGW)
from there.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type -
29.11.2014 15:44, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
The fact that the snapshot builds continue to be built seems to indicate
it is something environment (or OS) related.
No, it is just a stupid luck.
--
WBR, SD.
--
30.11.2014 9:07, Stuart Simon wrote:
1. Is there a field (e.g., fp_field_type) in the field or record header
that would
indicate the field type?
No.
2. What indicates the end (or, alternatively, size in bytes) of a non-final
field in a
record with two or more fields?
Nothing.
Hello, All.
Does anybody see anything wrong on attached patch?
--
WBR, SD.
dpm.epp.diff.7z
Description: Binary data
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly
03.12.2014 21:49, Leyne, Sean wrote:
Some details describing the nature of the tiny improvement, would be
appreciated.
gen_id(...,0) doesn't get exclusive lock on generator's page. Number of
operations
between CCH_FETCH() and CCH_RELEASE() is reduced a little.
--
WBR, SD.
07.12.2014 21:31, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
It could be either misconfigured server (ServerAuth) or the same
protocol issue as Jaybird experiences.
But why error message is connection is rejected instead of your user name
and
password are not defined?..
--
WBR, SD.
11.12.2014 13:47, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
Does user need to know what is the current ICU? Or current would
mean the one that can be found? What to do if multiple ICU versions are
installed and accessible?
I have another question: how user would know that (s)he must execute this
command? I.e.
11.12.2014 14:46, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Issuing error on connect is bad option - may be one needs to access
other tables w/o UTF columns?
Postponing error detection to undefined time doesn't seem as a good idea to
me either.
--
WBR, SD.
18.12.2014 14:28, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
So like selecting the types with using (or explicitly), user would
select the functions too.
Funny. What will be returned from the function found by dlsym()?
--
WBR, SD.
22.12.2014 12:42, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Work in progress
Ok. When can I see CLOOP sources committed into tree?
--
WBR, SD.
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate!
601 - 700 of 2579 matches
Mail list logo
