On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:21 PM, HERNAN MARTINEZ FOFFANI
hernan.marti...@obi-corp.com wrote:
Profiling my application I found that one bottleneck seems to be when
canceling a cursor. It also happens even if it was already consumed (i.e.,
What bottleneck?
finished to read all the rows).
Is
Well, because we don't have a strong agreement how it should behave
AND nobody even cared until today :D, I'll leave it as is. We can
always revisit this later.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
OK, DNET-510.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
Hi *,
maybe you remember the thread Releasing more often???. Yeah and
nothing happened. :) Because there was not a strong protest, I think
it's something we all 'd like to have.
I was lately really pissed of by SF's SVN. If you worked with it, not
just committing, I think just using it, you can
Profiling my application I found that one bottleneck seems to be when
canceling a cursor. It also happens even if it was already consumed (i.e.,
What bottleneck?
I was profiling my application to look up where to apply our optimization
efforts.
The process I was measuring is a big loop
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:28 AM, HERNAN MARTINEZ FOFFANI
hernan.marti...@obi-corp.com wrote:
What I didn't expect was that all command.Cancel()'s to take (as reported by
the profiler) more than 50% of the time. Such command is an ExecuteQuery
and the DataReader had already read all the records.
Jiri,
not so that you get an impression we were not interested, just because
we do not actively take part in the discussion. Most of us probably
are convinced that no objection == full approval and prefer keep
on just lurking and not to choke the mailing list when there is not
really
What I didn't expect was that all command.Cancel()'s to take (as reported by
the profiler) more than 50% of the time. Such command is an ExecuteQuery
and the DataReader had already read all the records.
And why are you calling the Cancel?
I have a wrapper class that abstracts some layers
And today even better https://github.com/blog/1547-release-your-software .
On Wednesday, July 3, 2013, Jiri Cincura wrote:
Hi *,
maybe you remember the thread Releasing more often???. Yeah and
nothing happened. :) Because there was not a strong protest, I think
it's something we all 'd like
Yeah. I would need to discuss this with other project admins. So it might
not work at all. GitHub has support for organisations so that's even better
for project (the repo would be official).
On Wednesday, July 3, 2013, André Knappstein wrote:
Jiri,
not so that you get an impression we were
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 13:36:58 +0200, Jiri Cincura disk...@cincura.net
wrote:
Yeah. I would need to discuss this with other project admins. So it
might
not work at all. GitHub has support for organisations so that's even
better
for project (the repo would be official).
SourceForge also provides a
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl wrote:
SourceForge also provides a Git repo. Have you looked into that?
Yes. No way I'm going that direction. Almost no features.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
