Profiling my application I found that one bottleneck seems to be when
canceling a cursor. It also happens even if it was already consumed (i.e.,
What bottleneck?
I was profiling my application to look up where to apply our optimization
efforts.
The process I was measuring is a big loop
What I didn't expect was that all command.Cancel()'s to take (as reported by
the profiler) more than 50% of the time. Such command is an ExecuteQuery
and the DataReader had already read all the records.
And why are you calling the Cancel?
I have a wrapper class that abstracts some layers
Hi,
Profiling my application I found that one bottleneck seems to be when canceling
a cursor. It also happens even if it was already consumed (i.e., finished to
read all the rows).
Is this an expected behavior? I'm asking because it may very well be a bug in
our data layers. I might also avoid
You could also see it from a different point: some part of your code is
misbehaving (ie not releasing connections back to the pool in a timely
Interesting. I would say why your code isn't going to be fixed in
first place? And should the library offer tools for this in first
place?
If you
I have a wpf application, and when exiting I always get a debug output:
A first chance exception of type 'System.NullReferenceException' occurred in
FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.dll
Firebird 2.5, Firebird Client 3.0.2.0, Runtime v4.0.30319
I havn’t been able to track down a
El 19/12/2012, a las 08:18, Jiri Cincura disk...@cincura.net escribió:
You can use remove ... /.
That's exactly what I was looking for: a remove (it doesn't fail if not
present) before an add.
Should have realized it myself.
Thanks a lot.
Hi,
What is the best practice for the app.config file?
Right now, I'm including a system.dataDbProviderFactories section in the
app.config bundled in our installer. But what if some of our users have already
installed Firebird.NET in their machine and have in their machine.config a FB
entry?
