Re: issues with pf

2002-03-02 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 01:57:52PM -0500, zerokey wrote: block in log all pass out all pass in on fxp0 proto icmp from any to any pass in on fxp0 proto tcp from any to any port = 53 pass in on fxp0 proto udp from any to any port = 53 pass in on fxp0 proto tcp from cc.cc.cc.cc to any

RE: Firewalls digest, Vol 1 #569 - 5 msgs

2002-03-02 Thread Bombara, Mark
I prefer sonicWALL over Netsreen, SonciWALL is a little more expensive, but the GUI interface and the remote capability for managing multiple SonicWALLs abroad using SonciWALLS Global management Software make it a breeze to manage, update patches, update virus definitions, and setting up VPN

please unsubscribe pico@secui.com

2002-03-02 Thread Pico \(\)
Thanks Pico

Why netscreen instead of say sonicwall

2002-03-02 Thread Pico GOH
Netscreen is quite simple firewall, it is more less Network device not a intelligent firewall¡¦..If you need for the soho the mid-range firewalls are almost same in its performance.Netscreen¡¯s Perofmance should be examined in the real network, as it shows quite different performance.All of their

RE: Why netscreen instead of say sonicwall

2002-03-02 Thread Jason Robertson
I think the reason many like the netscreen's is the quality of the products as of late, and more importantly speed. Many of the vulnerabilities that have plagued other firewall manufacturers.. The best thing, is they try to go towards what the market desires, without sacrificing security. Such

Re: Slow port scans

2002-03-02 Thread piranha piranha
dont dork around - block all the ranges of addys you've seen and add more on the choke router - internet facing interfaces - inbound. send him ip redirects if you can to see if you can knock down his connections. he is a piss ant.let your firewall deal with traffic that at least looks like

Re: why block source_routing

2002-03-02 Thread piranha piranha
irado, gpo find out what havoc you can play with source-routing then ask the same d^%$ question. or better yet send me a traceroute of the router interfaces in your domain and i will show a really good demo fo why not to allow this. piranha.. every other paper and/or recipe for

Re: Re: Réf . : Re : DMZ with switch

2002-03-02 Thread piranha piranha
no... On 14 Feb 2002, at 9:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the problem in the switch OS (problem of configuration, new vulnerability on switch OS, ...) = DMZ without security !! (Esxuse my english) Maybe your questions are: 1. If I use a switch in my DMZ, is it okay to allow external

Re: Why netscreen instead of say sonicwall

2002-03-02 Thread bob bobing
Netscreen¡¯s Perofmance should be examined in the real network, as it shows quite different performance. What do you mean by this? do you mean its slower or faster (yea right) than what they (being netscreen) say? --- Pico GOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Netscreen is quite simple firewall, it