Re: OSPF *on* Check Point FW-1

2002-06-13 Thread Paul D. Robertson
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Dave Row wrote: For security reasons, I don't like the idea of tunneling OSPF through the firewall (via GRE or whatever), because there's no way for the firewall to apply policy to the tunnel traffic (if the tunnel were maliciously used to pass non-OSPF traffic, the

RE: OSPF *on* Check Point FW-1

2002-06-13 Thread Dave Row
, 2002 4:09 PM To: Dave Row Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF *on* Check Point FW-1 Dave, I've been monitoring/researching threads re: OSPF neighbors separated by a firewall. I've worked and worked on this, and have given up on the notion (BTW, it boils down to hellos [both multicast

Re: OSPF *on* Check Point FW-1

2002-06-12 Thread Brian Ford
Dave, I've been monitoring/researching threads re: OSPF neighbors separated by a firewall. I've worked and worked on this, and have given up on the notion (BTW, it boils down to hellos [both multicast and unicast] being sent with a TTL of 1, *not* simply opening the right ports/protocols). Too

RE: OSPF *on* Check Point FW-1

2002-06-12 Thread Kent Hundley
Dave, W2K Server comes with an optional routing package that includes OSPF. For NT you can install the Routing and RAS package which also includes OSPF: http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/winfeatures/rras/rrasdown.a sp I played around with the RR package in a lab some time ago