From: ext Dave Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Too late. Things are already confused, namely about the technical
distinction between bridge and router.
Not really, You think that Sonicwall is a router and I know that it's
not.
However I made a mistake by stating that it is bridge, I
, 2002 21:58
To: Kotakoski Harri (EXT-Novosys/Copenhagen); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sonicwall Soho2
I have a soho(1) and I noticed the same thing. I can use the box either
as a bridge type of configuration, or rely on the built-in NAT if I want
to use a different network address on the inside
From: ext Dave Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At 10:56 AM 1/9/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, first thing to understand is that Sonicwall is
transparent bridge
not a router.
The Sonicwall Soho (not 2) that I have had for a couple of years is a
router. It also does NAT and
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sonicwall Soho2
From: ext Dave Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At 10:56 AM 1/9/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, first thing to understand is that Sonicwall is
transparent bridge
not a router.
The Sonicwall Soho (not 2) that I have had for a couple of years
I have a soho(1) and I noticed the same thing. I can use the box either as a bridge type of configuration, or rely on the built-in NAT if I want to use a different network address on the inside. The question I have is that what is the security implication of a bridge type of device vs. a router
At 11:13 AM 1/10/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lets not confuse these things over here.
Too late. Things are already confused, namely about the technical
distinction between bridge and router.
A bridge has a promiscuous LAN tap and captures ALL traffic on the LAN,
selectively passing
Hello,
One of our small subsidiary needs to install a firewall. We use to work
with Checkpoint products but this subsidiary has been contacted by a
local Sonicwall distributor. They try to sell them a Sonicwall Soho2.
We have no knowledge of this product, and I am wondering how it compares
PROTECTED]
Subject: Sonicwall Soho2
Hello,
One of our small subsidiary needs to install a firewall. We
use to work
with Checkpoint products but this subsidiary has been contacted by a
local Sonicwall distributor. They try to sell them a Sonicwall Soho2.
We have no knowledge
At 10:56 AM 1/9/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, first thing to understand is that Sonicwall is transparent bridge
not a router.
The Sonicwall Soho (not 2) that I have had for a couple of years is a
router. It also does NAT and a set of firewall filtering functions.
The device is
I'm looking at equipment to put in branch offices and home offices.
All these three products meet my basic specs, which are MRSP $500US,
support for 5 users/computers, and for future use ipsec/pptp to connect to
the head office.
Does anyone have any real world experience with these products?
I have not messed with the netopia but I would be
surprised if the netopia and netscreen have the same
code.
The netscreen is better than the sonicwall in many
ways.
acs
--- Vincent Power [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking at equipment to put in branch offices
and home offices.
All
: SonicWALL SOHO2 vs Netopia 910 vs NetScreen 5
I have not messed with the netopia but I would be
surprised if the netopia and netscreen have the same
code.
The netscreen is better than the sonicwall in many
ways.
acs
--- Vincent Power [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking at equipment to put
' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:59 PM
Subject: RE: SonicWALL SOHO2 vs Netopia 910 vs NetScreen 5
ACS,
How is the NetScreen better than the SonicWALL???
Sincerely,
Adam P. Zimmerer
Director of Internetworking
EcoNet.Com, Inc. - Since 1995
-Original
Not too much experience with the other firewalls but I would like to add a
couple things about the Netscreen5.
The NS-5's processor is built on Netscreens first ASIC technology unless that
changed in the last month or so. Their NS-100 and 1000 are the only devices
that use their second
14 matches
Mail list logo
