On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:51:03 +0400, SanskritFritz
sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
Lets unite our efforts on your repo. I'll send merge requests whenever
I updated any completions. Then you can send a merge request to the
main repo. Does your repo contain any other changes to fish besides
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Maxim Gonchar gma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:42:09 +0400, SanskritFritz
sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to recap some of what we talked here long time ago.
I wrote several completion scripts, and am still writing new ones.
Also I
I would like to recap some of what we talked here long time ago.
I wrote several completion scripts, and am still writing new ones.
Also I can see several branches and clones scattered around on
gitorius which contain useful and well written completions, especially
this one:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:20 AM, i...@whywouldwe.com
i...@whywouldwe.com wrote:
I use fish daily and it seems complete
to me, I'm curious about Grissom's
comment regarding devs, what new
features would people like to see? Is
there a list somewhere?
Yes, Axel's list from a long time ago:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Philip Ganchev phil.ganc...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, Axel's list from a long time ago:
http://fishshell.org/user_doc/index.html#todo
Hmm, I've never seen that list so far. I personally like the part about new
completions, I guess I can do something about that :)
On 18 November 2010 22:24, Martin Bähr mba...@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.atwrote:
tags are good to mark versions that are known to be stablee, branches
are good to seperate stable tested changes from others.
branches are cheap in git, so there is really no reason not to use them,
except if
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Christopher Nilsson
christop...@otherchirps.net wrote:
On 22 November 2010 23:06, SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Christopher Nilsson
christop...@otherchirps.net wrote:
There's now a 'fish-next' branch
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Christopher Nilsson
christop...@otherchirps.net wrote:
Yep -- Most of the changes that have gone in lately have been bug fixes,
that folks have had living in personal clone repositories for a fairly long
while. But a more central next branch sounds like a
On 18 November 2010 08:35, SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:17 PM, David Frascone d...@frascone.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:46 AM, SanskritFritz
sanskritfr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
I'm a big fan of fish, and plan to create an Archlinux
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:09:22PM +1100, Christopher Nilsson wrote:
Yep -- Most of the changes that have gone in lately have been bug fixes,
that folks have had living in personal clone repositories for a fairly long
while. But a more central next branch sounds like a good idea. Somewhere
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Grissiom chaos.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
I think -without-xsel is good for distros. Because the pkg manager of
that distro can suggest to install xsel together with fish, which is
more cleaner way IMHO.
There is such thing as 'optional dependencies' in
I use fish daily and it seems complete
to me, I'm curious about Grissom's
comment regarding devs, what new
features would people like to see? Is
there a list somewhere?
On 18/11/2010 21:47, Grissiom wrote:
I think a new release could
attract more eyes and thus bring more users/devs.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:00, SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Grissiom chaos.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
I think -without-xsel is good for distros. Because the pkg manager of
that distro can suggest to install xsel together with fish, which is
more
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.netwrote:
I can't speak to any changes in the git versions, but for the latest
release, xsel doesn't affect compiling the main program. The makefile
just extracts, builds, and installs the bundled copy unless
--without-xsel is
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:46 AM, SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
I'm a big fan of fish, and plan to create an Archlinux package from the
gitorius head.
My question is, is the current head of the gitorius repo considered stable
enough for everyday use? Thought I ask before I
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:17 PM, David Frascone d...@frascone.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:46 AM, SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
I'm a big fan of fish, and plan to create an Archlinux package from the
gitorius head.
My question is, is the current head of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
