On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Ray Andrews, K9DURk9...@rnacs.com wrote:
Theoretically, if you had an A/D capable of a sampling rate of 40 MHz or so,
a communications link with the bandwidth neseccary to handle the resulting
data stream, and the CPU power required to process that 40 MHz
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Philip Covingtonp.coving...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Ray Andrews, K9DURk9...@rnacs.com wrote:
Theoretically, if you had an A/D capable of a sampling rate of 40 MHz or so,
a communications link with the bandwidth neseccary to handle the
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Ken N9VV n...@wowway.com wrote:
Hearty CONGRATULATIONS TO
Eric KE5DTO, Matt KD5FGE, and Beppe IK3VIG,
10 of the beautiful new skins illustrated on a webpage.
http://www.n9vv.com/PowerSDR-skins.html
de ken n9vv
Very nice! Congrats!
Phil N8VB
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Tim Ellison telli...@itsco.com wrote:
The new XML data storage structure is MUCH better than Access.
XML after 4 long years... wonder why it took so long? ;-)
73 Phil N8VB
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Eric Wachsmann e...@flex-radio.com wrote:
Tell me then... Where are the 4 channel 192kHz audio USB devices??
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
Here's a defence of USB 2.0 based on experience:
We routinely have 4, 32 bit, 250 kHz data streams running via USB
Check out 1961... lot's of good ham gear in there...
http://www.radioshackcatalogs.com/catalogs/1961/
--
Phil Covington
Software Radio Laboratory LLC
Columbus, Ohio
http://www.srl-llc.com
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://com0com.sourceforge.net/
73 Phil N8VB
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Don Jackson AE5K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Naruta wrote:
Did HPSDR get hacked or crash?
Looks like we have trouble in river city. Thanks for the heads up.
Phil N8VB has the domain and I'll get in touch with him pronto to find
out what has
On Nov 20, 2007 11:27 AM, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
A better statement is that PowerSDR's general design is compatible
only with Flex-Radio style hardware architectures, and it only
includes hardware drivers for the SDR1000, Flex5000, and SoftRock. (or
radios with essentially
On Nov 20, 2007 12:33 PM, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Philip Covington [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Tue 20 Nov 2007
08:42:01 AM PST:
On Nov 20, 2007 11:27 AM, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
A better statement is that PowerSDR's general design is compatible
only with Flex
On Nov 13, 2007 12:06 PM, Phil LaMarche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I keep seeing this word and wonder what it is or means.
Please.
Phil
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/softrock40/?yguid=240694134
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
On 10/4/07, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:30 AM 10/4/2007, Robert McGwier wrote:
That was what I thought you were going to say. To me this is not
acceptable because it means no guarantee of support.
I don't see why it means no guarantee of support. MS provides a fair
amount of
On 10/4/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Covington wrote:
On 10/4/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Covington wrote:
On 10/3/07, Mike Schelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, my take is the performance monitor/CPU usage is vital tool to gauge
performance
On 10/4/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Covington wrote:
On 10/3/07, Mike Schelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, my take is the performance monitor/CPU usage is vital tool to gauge
performance issues since PowerSDR can be processor intensive more so than
memory
On 10/4/07, Bruce Mills - KL7JDR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows Vista has cpu @ ram meter in the sidebar gagets.
You can drag out the cpu meter by itself.
Very cool with PowerSDR running.
The cpu in PowerSDR not working here.
73's , Bruce
KL7JDR
Bruce W. Mills
P.O. Box 1500
On 10/3/07, Mike Schelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, my take is the performance monitor/CPU usage is vital tool to gauge
performance issues since PowerSDR can be processor intensive more so than
memory dependent and if Vista (version ¿) negates this, would someone from
Flex categorically
On 10/2/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Theis wrote:
Just got a vista machine going. Before I blow it away and put XP on it, I
thought I'd try it out.
powersdr installed like a breeze and the radio appears to work fine, but
the CPU indicator is gone.
What's up?
On 10/2/07, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
MS is also likely to continue to provide free tools for their
platform, albeit typically only for the latest versions (e.g. I
wouldn't count on VS2005 express editions still working in 2010.. the
tools might work ok, but .NET will have evolved,
On 10/1/07, Frank Brickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Lux wrote:
...several months from now,
which aren't online, and aren't free, either...
The Proceedings are available now. They were distributed to attendees.
Considering what TAPR (together with AMSAT) have been contributing
to
On 10/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZS6AVM Wrote:
Is the SRD-5000 series over priced ?
Well, in the eyes of many it may well be over priced !
Why do I say this ? – The concept of Software Defined Radio isn't being
embraced by too many Amateur Radio operators,
On 9/26/07, Lee Mushel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken,
I'm sure you realize you can't be a frequent contributor to the reflector,
be one of the first to get the Flex-5000A and not explain to the world why
you want to sell it! Failure to supply an explanation would fly in the
face of all
It doesn't hurt to get a F5K for volunteer services also... LOL...
Phil N8VB
On 9/26/07, Mike's Joke du Jour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob, one of the reasons we can enjoy
these amazing radios for a fraction
of the cost is due to the unselfish
contributions of the many volunteers.
A big
On 9/19/07, K3PZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I apologize for posting a private e-mail from this guy. I will not do it
again but in my opinion this guy has a real HO for Flex for some reason and I
that thought that the more experienced Flexers especially our programmers
would want to debate
On 9/18/07, K3PZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank (WA1GFZ),
Why don't post your observations/complaints on the Flex Reflector and debate
them with somebody alot more knowlegable than me. I am user/tester that
happens to love the new Flex 5K. I'm sure that Frank, Robert, Tim and some of
the
VERY VERY Nice!
73 Phil N8VB
On 9/14/07, Guy Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flexers may be interested in four photos I've posted to the Web:
http://www.guyatkins.com/files/sdr_front.jpg Front of homebrew
SDR-1000/HPSDR (receive-only) enclosure with Griffin Powermate tuning knob
and LW,
On 8/17/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There my apologies end. I do not discount Phil's contributions. I also
do not propose solutions for problems that do not exist and I most
certainly do not waste my own money for nonexistent issues. If you were
listening to the office every
On 8/18/07, Jerry Flanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those with sufficient desk space may want to consider one hardware
alternative to the problems being discussed re VCOM:
For digital modes, I am now using two separate computers: One
dedicated to running the SDR-1000 (only) and a second
On 8/18/07, Jerry Flanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes - I did this as an interim step to avoid the VAC hiccups, using
hardware audio cables from my D-44 to my on-board sound card, all
within the same computer. I used VCOM for CAT. BTW, VCOM worked
perfectly for me. I had plenty of hardware
On 8/16/07, John P Basilotto W5GI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
No B model in the works at this time but who knows what the future will
bring.
Shirts and caps will be available for sale in the next month or two.
Priority right now is to get 5000s in the hands of customers.
73
John P.
Frank, Bob,
In DttSP ovsv.c, the output of the ifft is normalized over each block.
The scaling factor is computed as scale = 1.0/(real) fftlen.
I am thinking that it should be possible to pre-scale the filter
coefficients by the same factor (1.0/(real)fftlen). Since the filter
is only
On 8/13/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil:
Thank you. I moved the scaling by p-scale into the constructor and
just commented out the scaling in the running routine (with a notation)
in ovsv.c in both the DttSP in PowerSDR and in ab2kt/dttsp-ng branch in
sdr_linux.
PLEASE
On 8/13/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil:
Thank you. I moved the scaling by p-scale into the constructor and
just commented out the scaling in the running routine (with a notation)
in ovsv.c in both the DttSP in PowerSDR and in ab2kt/dttsp-ng branch in
sdr_linux.
PLEASE
On 8/12/07, k5nwa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:18 AM 8/12/2007, Dudley Hurry wrote:
http://www.qsonet.com
I agree with Phil, TeamSpeak is free and works great.
Although I'm curious to see how it's implemented, unfortunately I
don't have a working digital camera at the moment so I can't
On 8/8/07, Ken N9VV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put together a few pictures of what the new packaging looks like. It
is solid and well thought out. There are surprises in the box. I know
you will be as thrilled as I was to receive your new FLEX-5000
On 8/9/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://n4hy.org/20MeterBottom.png
http://n4hy.org/6MeterBottom.png
Are these with a dummy load connected or operating into an antenna?
The 20 meter picture's baseline is about 10 db lower than the 6 meter
baseline.
I would be great to see the
On 8/9/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Covington wrote:
On 8/9/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://n4hy.org/20MeterBottom.png
http://n4hy.org/6MeterBottom.png
Are these with a dummy load connected or operating into an antenna?
The 20 meter picture's
On 8/2/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FireBrick wrote:
Will I be able to with the 5K???
Chasing FW0MO on 80 meters split this morning
I enabled the MultiRX so that I could hear the station he just worked.
I had the filter set to 100Hz on the FW0
Great, really cut down
On 7/27/07, Gerald Capodieci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes: Let's do it on a subscription basis for upgrades. The initial download
and a one year subscription could be free with purchase of the radio. Then
the subscriptions would add an identifier to the software that could send out
the
On 6/8/07, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil, what is the file type? It downloads with no extension, just as an
octet-stream.
-Tim
I had the same problem here using Firefox. When I opened it with IE 7
it is a Word document.
73 Phil N8VB
On 4/19/07, Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may have already been recommended. I have been doing a lot of
deleting without reading.
Why don't we just put SDR-5000 or SDR-1000 or something to
distinguish between the two in the subject line for hardware issues
and then put power SDR for
On 4/19/07, k5nwa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking more like one filters the subject, if you don't like
the current discussion then filter on the subject separate
reflectors That way no particular code word has to be put in the
subject, one is not dependent on someone putting in the
On 4/17/07, Steve Kirk (KW5TX) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spoken like a true Marketing Man.
Im running a dualcore Pentium. with 2gb of ram etc
As a loyal customer of Flex :) My opinion it is one of the worst...and
the ONLY thing on the Flex...IMO... that isn't the BEST.
I feel sure there
On 4/16/07, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question:
Q40:Q40. Will the FLEX-5000's low-pass filters prevent authorized
operation outside of the amateur bands?
A. The filters are optimized for the amateur bands but will operate
over the entire HF spectrum. We lock transmitter TR relay
On 4/16/07, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:28 AM 4/16/2007, Philip Covington wrote:
O
This does not sound like good news. It sounds as if certain features
of the hardware will be controlled by firmware and without the source
code to the firmware, you will not be able to make
On 4/16/07, Frank Brickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's hope that this is just a miscommunication and there is no
firmware to restrict things like frequency coverage. Maybe the FAQ
writer was referring the the PowerSDR software when he mentioned the
lock out.
Either way, it's a
On 4/16/07, Toby Deinhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Phil,
you assume of course, that there is more firmware than just a
controller for the firewire. I made the sloppy assumption that the
firmware is the console, which is open source.
vy 73 de toby
Yes, of course. I am assuming that
On 4/16/07, jim davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentlemen,
Flex has'nt even introduced the NEW 5000 but yet everybody seems to be
ripping it to SHREDDS!!!
WHY???
I'm a potential FLEXIE and we really think that from the stand point of
NOISE-SUPPRESSION like
in my crappy/noisey enviroment
On 4/13/07, Alan NV8A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/13/07 11:04 am Jim Lux wrote:
The Flex models are in a league all of their own for factory
ready transceivers. The traditional big 4 models are all
still just traditional radios with computers in them.
Not entirely true.. my IC7000
On 4/13/07, Mike Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some time back the buzz was high here over the new Play Station-3 and it's
possible use with an SDR-1000.
Any results yet?
Mike
I think Bob N4HY and Eric Blossom were working with the PS3. You
might try emailing them directly.
73 Phil
Please see:
http://apcmag.com/5835/vendors_in_no_rush_to_ditch_xp_for_vista
How does this affect Flex Radio's decision to supply the SDR-5000C
with Windows XP? It looks like XP will not be available before the
SDR-5000C even hits the streets.
Phil N8VB
Re: Q23
Could someone from Flex please give a general overview of the hardware
design changes in the SDR-5000 from the SDR-1000 design? I think that
some may get the wrong impression that the SDR-5000 is just a SDR-1000
with an integrated $1000-level sound card. I realize the hardware
design is
On 4/12/07, A.R.S. - W5AMI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why demand anything unless you have ordered one? And if you HAVE
bought one already, before you know what you're getting, that's not
very prudent!
John has promised more to come, and I'm sure he (or someone) will
deliver the expected info
On 4/12/07, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you do the math, the FLEX-5000A is not that much more expensive than
the SDR-1000
First, lets assume the PC is a wash in this equation. A comparably
loaded SDR-1000, with a 100 watt PA, and assuming you did pare it up
with a LynxTWO sound
On 4/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original Message
The 1000 has become a super radio with the advent of the SDR-X
software.
I am having a few problems with my PC that I normally use for
downloading Flex-Radio updates, it's been playing up for a while and
bad
On 4/6/07, Hugh Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the reassurance I was looking for.
I was beginning to wonder if I should flog my SDR-1000 before the market
is flooded by owners who want to upgrade to the 5000 and it be becomes
worthless (I already see them hitting the swap shops), or if
On 4/6/07, Alan NV8A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, now that the sound card is going to be built into the radio,
could one get away with a less powerful computer than for the SDR-1000?
Alan NV8A
I would expect the computer requirements to be about the same. The
DSP and display are still
On 4/4/07, Neal Campbell K3NC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
Neal Campbell K3NC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give us some details about the SDR-5000 ad please.
73 Phil N8VB
___
FlexRadio mailing
On 4/4/07, Alan NV8A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/04/07 02:37 pm Neal Campbell K3NC wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
I've just looked through the April QST again without seeing anything
about an SDR-5000. There doesn't seem to be a FlexRadio ad at
On 4/4/07, Alan NV8A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/04/07 03:35 pm I wrote:
Just saw the ad in QST for the new radio. When will it go on sale?
I've just looked through the April QST again without seeing anything
about an SDR-5000. There doesn't seem to be a FlexRadio ad at all.
I have
On 3/8/07, W2AGN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Maser wrote:
Why would anyone say something stupid like dump Microsoft? Without
Microsoft, we'd still be using CPM. I can never understand why people
are so quick to want to jump from Microsoft. XP has been a wonderful
operating system.
On 3/8/07, Frank Brickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/8/07, Philip Covington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe most guys buy the SDR-1000 to actually operate with it
(which mostly just works in Windows)
Which is exactly 50% of the reason the standard platform should be OSX.
73
On 2/22/07, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:42 AM 2/22/2007, Frank Brickle wrote:
Jim Lux wrote:
And when will PowerSDR have the new dttsp v2.0 integrated?
Does the Windows dttsp v2.0/PowerSDR v2.x still use PortAudio?
That is entirely up to Flex.
The development trunk now
On 2/22/07, Eric Wachsmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did respond... privately. :) I'll summarize the main points below:
I'm not sure I would say that we have punted on supporting other operating
systems. Rather, I would say that we have chosen to stay in business.
Whether Flex chose
On 2/22/07, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:58 AM 2/22/2007, Philip Covington wrote:
On 2/22/07, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really can't blame Flex for choosing Windows. If you think the
support burden is bad with Windows, it would be a nightmare with
Linux. You would have
Eric,
Is PThreads no longer used in PowerSDR?
Phil N8VB
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
On 1/10/07, Philip Covington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric,
Is PThreads no longer used in PowerSDR?
Phil N8VB
Never mind... DttSP appears to use PThreads.
Phil N8VB
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz
On 1/3/07, Bob McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
After we have the radio running either stand alone with a Linux box in
it (or in the case of SDR-1000, by it) we can then work out the delivery
of audio across the room, across town, across the planet. It will
simply be a different
On 1/4/07, Bob McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Covington wrote:
On 1/3/07, Bob McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
After we have the radio running either stand alone with a Linux box in
it (or in the case of SDR-1000, by it) we can then work out the delivery
of audio across
On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... It makes no sense to run anything but Linux on
the embedded controllers and then have them be a server.
Um, I respectfully disagree. It may make no sense to run Vista / XP /
Windows-flavor-of-the-era on an embedded controller,
On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well in fact a 1 board functional clone of the SDR-1000 1W is already
available, check out www.kd-elektronik.com/af_e/sdr_e.html. Seems to be a
well-made board, and the price is right, too. Thanks to Dominik Bugmann
HB9CZF for pointing
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html
:-)
Happy New Year to All!
73 de Phil N8VB
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link:
On 1/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher T. Day wrote:
* High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *
Of course, there is always Java, which not only compiles across
platforms but whose executables really do run across platforms. But that
Congratulations Ken! I am sure Ken will be a great asset to Flex
Radio Systems. Ken has always been a great source of news and helpful
information about Software Defined Radio.
Good deal!
Phil N8VB
On 12/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John,
I first became aware of and
Migrate Visual Studio C and C++ projects to Eclipse CDT:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-ecl-vscdt/index.html?ca=drs-
Phil N8VB
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
On 12/11/06, Mike Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been following the Play Station 3 thread with interest but I cannot
glean enough lay persons information from the back and forth to understand
what it means.
I have a few clues. If Sony is offering a Linux 2.6 version it must be open
On 12/9/06, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:43 PM 12/8/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
O
Somehow, I suspect that an SDR1000 and PowerSDR isn't going to cut it
for that application. And, for that particular application, there are
a host of off-the-shelf ASICs that do the decoding
On 12/8/06, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:42 AM 12/8/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
On 12/8/06, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:25 PM 12/7/2006, Charles Greene wrote
There's a write up on PS3 and writing game software for it in the
latest edition of IEEE Spectrum. I
From LinuxDevices.com:
[Updated Dec. 7] -- Sony-contributed patches aimed at adding
machine-specific features for the PlayStation 3 (PS3) have been merged
into the stable 2.6.20 kernel tree. The patches should greatly
simplify maintaining Linux kernels for
On 12/7/06, Philip Covington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/7/06, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coupled with Ozy/Mercury, and one mixer/frontend/tuner,we could all
have SDR HDTV in a few weeks of development and the Cell can handle it.
The memory bandwidth between
On 12/7/06, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coupled with Ozy/Mercury, and one mixer/frontend/tuner,we could all
have SDR HDTV in a few weeks of development and the Cell can handle it.
The memory bandwidth between the cell and MAIN MEMORY (not cache) is
29 GB/sec. The 8 SPE's
On 12/7/06, lyle johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to figure out if we plan to support
the PS3 in our plans, how we get data on and
off the Cell based computer. So far as I have
been able to find, the PS3 does not
support USB (as in doesn't have it).
All the specs I've
On 12/7/06, James Courtier-Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not surprising really.
The cell processor was developed and tested using Linux.
James
I don't think anyone is/was surprised. What I was saying is cool... :-)
Phil N8VB
___
I
On 12/7/06, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't bet anything yet. I did mean 200 GFlops sustained per cell.
I got too enthused. I can do all I need to with 50 GFlops on a
single Cell Server and if I get 100 with the dual cell server, it will
be awesome. As always,
On 11/14/06, Bob McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am very wary of using Mono for a major development until ALL of the
implications of the MS/Novell situation fall out. I am personally
concerned that with the Mono development being hosted at Novell, and the
potential problems they have
Actually GTK# works very well in Mono. Definitely better than WinForms.
73 de Phil N8VB
On 11/1/06, Paul Shaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just for reference, I don't know how well this would work. Needs
investigation.
Probably full of bugs and problems, who knows?
On 10/24/06, Alex Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In VB6 there is a event driven command called OnCommEvent which takes care
of those waiting milliseconds automatically for you, is there any thing like
it on C#?
I.E.
' The OnComm event is used for trapping communications events and
On 10/18/06, James Courtier-Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric wrote on 10/10/06
We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of
the software. Rather, we will use FREE TOOLS. We have not settled 100%
on what those free tools will be, but right Visual Studio
On 10/18/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The release of the new version shouldn't be the primary criteria for
purchasing the IDE for version 1.x
I believe, that there is not going to be point in the future (if ever)
where PowerSDR 1.x will not be usable with the SDR-1000 hardware.
On 10/18/06, Bob Cowdery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 13:20 -0400, Philip Covington wrote:
On 10/18/06, James Courtier-Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric wrote on 10/10/06
We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of
the software
On 10/18/06, Eric Wachsmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not necessarily. I would prefer to have a cross platform solution. I have
not evaluated Eclipse yet, but it sounds like it could be an alternative.
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
I thought Eclipse was a development environment. Are
On 10/18/06, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:29 AM 10/18/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
Well, the first place I would start is to open the Console project
file in C# Express and let it convert the project - then start fixing
the problems with .NET 1.1 to .NET 2.0 from there.
You
On 10/11/06, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Covington wrote:
On 10/11/06, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:44 AM 10/11/2006, Jim, W4ATK wrote:
Phil Covington wrote:
A lot of the perceived need for threading goes away when you get away
from
straight
line
On 10/11/06, Paul Shaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you have said below is mostly true for the current UI class design,
which I think should be abandoned.
You are concerned about issues that shouldn't even come up, but are due to a
less than optimum overall
class design. The pesky
On 10/11/06, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:44 AM 10/11/2006, Jim, W4ATK wrote:
Phil Covington wrote:
A lot of the perceived need for threading goes away when you get away from
straight
line procedural code.
As an OLD machine language programmer, I am of the impression that
I don't think he meant 'problems' as in defects or bugs... I think he
mean 'problems' as in interesting challenges.
73 Phil N8VB
On 10/3/06, Lee A Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Real Problems?
I don't have any Real Problems I get on every day
and make as many contacts as I want. I run
Please...
On 10/2/06, Gerald Capodieci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been a commercial purchaser of software for over 30 years and I've
developed an aversion to words like: Power, Super, Deluxe, Extreme, Plus,
Perfect when used in the title or description of a software product. They
make
It would be pretty easy to integrate this functionality into PowerSDR.
Along with vCOM it will allow you to run CAT to any/multiple of the
virtual or hardware com ports on the system as well as do CAT between
computers over the network. I had a checkbox to allow you to
designate which com ports
I didn't know there was a Linux version of PowerSDR Console! :-)
73 de Phil N8VB
On 9/19/06, Frank Brickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah. It's been in the Linux version forever ;-)
73
Frank
AB2KT
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 22:12 -0400, Philip Covington wrote:
Yeah, kinda like déjà vu
Yeah, kinda like déjà vu!
73 de Phil N8VB
On 9/19/06, Bob Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very Cool! Congrats guys.
Bob K5KDN
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert McGwier
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 8:42 PM
To: FlexRadio
On 8/4/06, Dave Ackrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember sending of a donation in the rush of excitement that was
generated by the idea of what seemed to be a software sound card
connector which would possibly do for digital mode program connections
what vCOM does for other rig control
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
