On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 05:04, David Megginson wrote:
This claims a 64K object size in Linux:
http://tinyscheme.sourceforge.net/home.html
Please, don't.
Incorporating this will, I think, almost instantly turn off new
developers (and at least one current one). It's not possible to pick a
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Now with a different 'approach'. Starting on ground ...
$ fgfs --lon=-122.4998 --lat=37.5845 --heading=275
... and very slowly taxiing over the border. Right when I pass over
I get thrown on my back. Ouch ... :-|
That did it. There is
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
From my reading of the manual, the transponder FL display is always
locked to 29.92 and thus could be significantly different from true
altitude as you point out in your previous msg.
It'd have to be that way to be useful for ATC.
Best,
Jim
(f) Place the transponder data, if any and according to mode selected,
on the property system and ideally expose it in the multiplayer stuff.
That will subsequently make it easy to integrate a D-BRITE simulation.
H. SquawkBox Pro Controller. :)
g.
Hi,
has anyone recently used the FDR? I've just recorded a couple of
flights with the a4-yasim, and whenever I try to play back the
recording, fgfs dies with a segfault.
The commands used were the ones from README.IO, and I've used them
once a while ago with the c172. Maybe it's a yasim issue?
* Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 15:22:
That did it. There is definately something at this location, on my display
driven by V3-3000 I see a white line (right side of picture):
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/SanAndreas.png
Yes. These small artifacts were always there. But they have
When I was working on getting the agl calculation functioning with all the
viewer changes, I toyed with the idea doing something that ignored sudden
(and/or unreasonable) variations to AGL, at least for a few frames. It
was
mostly in response to what happens when a very fast aircraft
John Wojnaroski [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Perhaps that explains the problem I've been seeing. When performing autoland
approaches in the 747 (approach speeds around 137-150KIAS) the aircraft
would suddenly level off at decision height ( 200 ft) and then dive for the
runway as it tried to
Alex Perry writes:
(c) Remember that it reports pressure altitude and not any other altitude.
Is this true? I thought it was slaved to the altimeter. If so,
please scratch the last part of my previous posting.
No. Your mode C hardware shares the static port with the altimeter, but
uses
Jim Wilson wrote:
When I get some time I'll run further tests and maybe come up with a
patch to avoid this sort of glitch. It would be helpful if someone
happened to know why this gap happens in the scenery data sometimes.
I'm sure Curt can talk in more detail, but my guess is that this is
Major A wrote:
has anyone recently used the FDR? I've just recorded a couple of
flights with the a4-yasim, and whenever I try to play back the
recording, fgfs dies with a segfault.
dumb-question
We have a FDR feature with playback???
/dumb-question
Andy
--
Andrew J. Ross
Tony Peden writes:
This claims a 64K object size in Linux:
http://tinyscheme.sourceforge.net/home.html
In fact, it turns out to be 64K stripped *executable* size for the
standalone interpreter; the object/library is even smaller.
Please, don't.
I hear your pain.
Incorporating
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 09:47, Andy Ross wrote:
Major A wrote:
has anyone recently used the FDR? I've just recorded a couple of
flights with the a4-yasim, and whenever I try to play back the
recording, fgfs dies with a segfault.
dumb-question
We have a FDR feature with playback???
If someone can supply a core ECMAScript implementation that is small
and easy to embed, then we should jump on it; otherwise, the evil of
holding back FlightGear development indefinitely might outweigh even
the evil of using Scheme.
One of the nice things about LISP (and I assume Scheme) is
David Megginson wrote:
I agree that Scheme will turn a lot of people off, but I'm annoyed
that we cannot find a core ECMAScript implementation the same size
(even then, the core source code for this is over 200K).
A quick google showed:
http://ixlib.sourceforge.net/
All of it is ~ 360 kb.
* Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 18:26:
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A huge value would probably only make the AGL radar flash a wrong value
but it wouldn't have further, malign effects.
Crash detection is triggered in some cases which will basically shutdown fdm.
Any
Andy Ross writes:
Jim Wilson wrote:
When I get some time I'll run further tests and maybe come up with a
patch to avoid this sort of glitch. It would be helpful if someone
happened to know why this gap happens in the scenery data sometimes.
I'm sure Curt can talk in more detail, but my
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 10:09, Christian Mayer wrote:
David Megginson wrote:
I agree that Scheme will turn a lot of people off, but I'm annoyed
that we cannot find a core ECMAScript implementation the same size
(even then, the core source code for this is over 200K).
A quick google
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 10:23, Tony Peden wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 10:09, Christian Mayer wrote:
David Megginson wrote:
I agree that Scheme will turn a lot of people off, but I'm annoyed
that we cannot find a core ECMAScript implementation the same size
(even then, the core
Melchior FRANZ writes:
* Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 18:26:
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A huge value would probably only make the AGL radar flash a wrong value
but it wouldn't have further, malign effects.
Crash detection is triggered in some cases which will
* Curtis L. Olson -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 19:32:
When I've been the only one to see weird problems it has often helped
to do a complete make clean; make; make install
Hmmm ... but I interpreted Jim's That did it. There is definately
something at this location... that I'm not the only one.
Tony Peden writes:
I don't know how many interdependencies there are, but the js related
source and headers total 142k.
Check that, 212k.
That's pretty close. I wonder how bad the dependencies are.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
David Megginson wrote:
Tony Peden writes:
I don't know how many interdependencies there are, but the js related
source and headers total 142k.
Check that, 212k.
That's pretty close. I wonder how bad the dependencies are.
They said: only STL and Flex
But as we'd budle it
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 1:59 pm, Cameron Moore wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Check) [2002.07.03 00:32]:
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 1:19 am, Cameron Moore wrote:
I decided to make a couple splash screens out of some nice screenshots,
and I'm curious how they look on other systems --
That's probably an issue with the autopilot and the 747. It's been
difficult
finding control factors that work for all the different speeds, compounded
by
the giant mass of the 747. At those lower speeds the effectiveness of the
elevator can change dramatically with relatively small
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 19:41:
But I will now eradicate all my object files and make everything clean.
Done. Same problem. Unfortunately, I'm neither familiar with the scenery
handling, nor with the vector stuff. But I'll try to find out more ... :-/
m.
Melchior FRANZ writes:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 19:41:
But I will now eradicate all my object files and make everything clean.
Done. Same problem. Unfortunately, I'm neither familiar with the scenery
handling, nor with the vector stuff. But I'll try to find out more ...
Does anyone have any objections to lowering the relative volume of the
gear and flaps in the default cessna 172?
Regards,
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota
Melchior FRANZ writes:
* Curtis L. Olson -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 21:30:
Can you dump out the ground elevation every frame and see what that
does as you fly over a seam and hit the invisible wall?
I did this already and posted the results in this thread. Do you want
to see more? A
Melchior FRANZ writes:
* Curtis L. Olson -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 21:35:
It would be interesting to also see the actual ground elevation along
with the other numbers you posted.
Ahh, sorry. I mixed up altitude with ground elevation. May take a while,
I'm not sure if the jsbsim log
Jim Wilson writes:
Did you try rolling out from the position that Melchior included in this
mornings message (the one with the agl data)? I couldn't replicate before but
I can by rolling on the ground (a couple feet) from that position.
Just curious to know if you do.
I thought Melchior
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 18:26:
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A huge value would probably only make the AGL radar flash a wrong value
but it wouldn't have further, malign effects.
Crash detection is triggered in some
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jim Wilson writes:
Did you try rolling out from the position that Melchior included in this
mornings message (the one with the agl data)? I couldn't replicate before but
I can by rolling on the ground (a couple feet) from that position.
Just
* Curtis L. Olson -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 21:39:
You could also insert a cout/printf in the main loop ...
Plan B was to use the built-in logger. But apart from the table head I don't
get any information. Now up to cout then ...
m.
___
* Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 21:55:
I'm sorry, must have misunderstood your message. I was only describing the
effect from a programmer's perspective, not stating that it was acceptible.
My question was just to discover if you noticed anything else, like your
monitor exploding,
Melchior FRANZ writes:
Never mind. I just try to be a serious pilot, and dying in a plane crash
is pretty dramatic. And, as a non-Micros~1 user, random crashes are
generally undesirable for me. :-]
Ignoring my own previous statement about avoiding politics -- I've
seen a lot of varient
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I agree that random/periodic bugs are insidious and frustrating and
makes the software look like crap; therefore we should have a
'culture' of agressive pursuit of these problems. But, unfortunately
I can't replicate your particular problem here which makes it
* Andy Ross -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 22:30:
Now, 2m doesn't sound like a lot to worry about [...]
Well, I wouldn't like to drive my car in a 2m high wall. That must
be quite unpleasant even at lower speeds.
m.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
* Curtis L. Olson -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 22:29:
[...] but I hadn't seen MICROS~1 yet ... got a chuckle out of it. :-)
Hey, that's how they are spelling their name themselves, even on NT-boxes.
I didn't know whether I should be amused or shocked when I saw it first. :-
m.
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Melchior FRANZ writes:
Never mind. I just try to be a serious pilot, and dying in a plane crash
is pretty dramatic. And, as a non-Micros~1 user, random crashes are
generally undesirable for me. :-]
Ignoring my own previous statement about
It was a particularly nasty trick on a 172M, which uses an up/down
toggle switch rather than a slider for flaps, but I caught on when the
plane wouldn't climb at 70kt with full power.
humor
Next time, look to your left and a little bit up and to the rear. If
there's a big honkin' chunk of
Gene Buckle writes:
humor
Next time, look to your left and a little bit up and to the rear. If
there's a big honkin' chunk of metal blocking your view, check the flap
switch. *huge grin*
/humor
The other one I've learned from real experience (as a passenger). If
while you are looking a
Gene Buckle writes:
humor
Next time, look to your left and a little bit up and to the rear. If
there's a big honkin' chunk of metal blocking your view, check the flap
switch. *huge grin*
/humor
The other one I've learned from real experience (as a passenger). If
while you are
* Jim Wilson -- Wednesday 03 July 2002 22:45:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q143395
OK, we want to avoid politics ... but when Windows 98 was released, Apple
had an advertisement campain which basically consisted of the string
C:\CONGRTLS.W98
m.
Gene Buckle writes:
It was a particularly nasty trick on a 172M, which uses an up/down
toggle switch rather than a slider for flaps, but I caught on when the
plane wouldn't climb at 70kt with full power.
humor
Next time, look to your left and a little bit up and to the rear. If
Curtis L. Olson writes:
The other one I've learned from real experience (as a passenger). If
while you are looking a little up and to the rear to check flap
status, if you also notice a big plume of something that looks a lot
like smoke coming off one or both wings, land and check your
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 14:04, Gene Buckle wrote:
Gene Buckle writes:
humor
Next time, look to your left and a little bit up and to the rear. If
there's a big honkin' chunk of metal blocking your view, check the flap
switch. *huge grin*
/humor
The other one I've learned from
Gene Buckle writes:
Gene Buckle writes:
humor
Next time, look to your left and a little bit up and to the rear. If
there's a big honkin' chunk of metal blocking your view, check the flap
switch. *huge grin*
/humor
The other one I've learned from real experience (as a
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 23:00:45 +0200
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C:\CONGRTLS.W98
I don't get it.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 14:04, Gene Buckle wrote:
The other one I've learned from real experience (as a passenger). If
while you are looking a little up and to the rear to check flap
status, if you also notice a big plume of something that looks a lot
like smoke coming off one or both
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 23:00:45 +0200
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C:\CONGRTLS.W98
I don't get it.
It was actually for the release of Windows 95 and it translates to
Congradulations Windows 95
g.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Jon S Berndt writes:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 23:00:45 +0200
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C:\CONGRTLS.W98
I don't get it.
In unix this would probably translate to something like cw98 (to save
typing.)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project
I was always unsure about the basics of navigation and guidance until I
listened to this .wav file, then everything made sense! I'm sure some of
you nav people have heard it before, but it is funny. It is suppose to be
from an official US Air Force training file, but it sounds as if the
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 11:40, David Megginson wrote:
Tony Peden writes:
I don't know how many interdependencies there are, but the js related
source and headers total 142k.
Check that, 212k.
That's pretty close. I wonder how bad the dependencies are.
OK, I've gotten the
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 14:50, Jonathan Polley wrote:
I was always unsure about the basics of navigation and guidance until I
listened to this .wav file, then everything made sense! I'm sure some of
you nav people have heard it before, but it is funny. It is suppose to be
from an official
Andy Ross wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I agree that random/periodic bugs are insidious and frustrating and
makes the software look like crap; therefore we should have a
'culture' of agressive pursuit of these problems. But, unfortunately
I can't replicate your particular problem
This is great stuff; apologies for forgetting to respond yesterday. :)
Dave Perry wrote:
I was able to get good control (vtab effectiveness) and early tail up
(htab effectiveness) with both values at 2.25. It was easier with
both values at 2.5. I then shot a number of touch-n-goes using
Jonathan Polley wrote:
I was always unsure about the basics of navigation and guidance until I
listened to this .wav file, then everything made sense! I'm sure some of
you nav people have heard it before, but it is funny. It is suppose to be
from an official US Air Force training file,
Tony Peden wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 11:40, David Megginson wrote:
Tony Peden writes:
I don't know how many interdependencies there are, but the js related
source and headers total 142k.
Check that, 212k.
That's pretty close. I wonder how bad the dependencies are.
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 15:50, Christian Mayer wrote:
Tony Peden wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 11:40, David Megginson wrote:
Tony Peden writes:
I don't know how many interdependencies there are, but the js related
source and headers total 142k.
Check that, 212k.
by Rick Lehrbaum -- Executive Editor, LinuxDevices.com
GUESS WHO'S COMING TO LINUXWORLD?
As if to fulfill Malcolm Dean's prophecy (preceding story), word
spread around Linux and Open Source oriented websites like wildfire
this week that Microsoft Corp. will be an exhibitor
61 matches
Mail list logo
