* Lee Elliott -- Saturday 19 July 2003 00:54:
I'm with Michael entirely on this. Adding new stuff is
great but not if it's at the expense of old features.
Sigh ... We =do= remove old features once in a while (and
Network-OLK will be the next ;-), but in this case you are
preaching to the
* Michael Selig -- Friday 18 July 2003 23:53:
Something interesting about your damped view is that it appears
to simulate what MSFS has in their chase view
That's disgusting. But I'm innocent. I don't have Micros~1 installed,
let alone MSFS. I just wanted to have a real chase view, that at
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 20:30:15 -0400
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard A Downing writes:
I'm working my way through some of the UK aerodromes, and have hit
some problems agreeing ANY of the decimal coordinates
in the FG files with the DMS coordinates given in the UK AIP.
On Saturday 19 July 2003 05:21, Jim Wilson wrote:
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
With the YF-23 it's
very obvious.
Hi Lee,
In a separate message I've sent a patch to backout the target climb rate
fix.
I was able to stabalize the A/P by making adjustments with the fix, but the
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now. Go ahead and
use the patch I posted last night. What I was shooting for was a little more
smoothness when switching from V/S to
On Saturday 19 July 2003 08:37, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Lee Elliott -- Saturday 19 July 2003 00:54:
I'm with Michael entirely on this. Adding new stuff is
great but not if it's at the expense of old features.
Sigh ... We =do= remove old features once in a while (and
Network-OLK will be
On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:00, Jim Wilson wrote:
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now. Go ahead
and
use the patch I posted last night. What I was shooting
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/fokker100
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv5280/Aircraft/fokker100
Log Message:
Directory /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/fokker100 added to the
repository
Hi Erik,
Think we're still missing the
Jim Wilson wrote:
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/fokker100
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv5280/Aircraft/fokker100
Log Message:
Directory /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/fokker100 added to the
repository
Hi Erik,
Think we're still
Roland Häder wrote:
Hello.
Here are my patches files. Please check them out and include them in
your project.
These files has been testet with a Phoenix Joystick (4-axis,
4-buttons).
Thanks Roland,
I will check them out and put them in CVS when I have some time. It will
probably be tomorrow
Richard A Downing writes:
I'm working my way through some of the UK aerodromes, and have hit some problems
agreeing ANY of the decimal coordinates
in the FG files with the DMS coordinates given in the UK AIP.
For instance, London Gatwick (EGKK) has ARP at N510853 W0001125, which by my
Am Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 22:21 schrieb Christopher S Horler:
This sometimes happens when I reset - I can't reproduce it everytime,
I'm looking into things that may make it happen - it seems almost like
some values are being initialized incorrectly i.e. the plane starts the
right way up then
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 22:21 schrieb Christopher S Horler:
This sometimes happens when I reset - I can't reproduce it everytime,
I'm looking into things that may make it happen - it seems almost like
some values are being initialized incorrectly i.e. the plane
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 14:04, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 22:21 schrieb Christopher S Horler:
This sometimes happens when I reset - I can't reproduce it everytime,
I'm looking into things that may make it happen - it seems almost like
some
On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:33, Lee Elliott wrote:
On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:00, Jim Wilson wrote:
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now. Go ahead
and
It seemed like it'd be ok to commit what I have so far for 3d instrumentation
in the boeing 747-400. Screen shot:
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/747-400-panel-01.png
Basically it works but there are a few problems:
1. I need to go back over the geometry for 16bit depth. It does work on the
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 14:12, Tony Peden wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 14:04, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 22:21 schrieb Christopher S Horler:
This sometimes happens when I reset - I can't reproduce it everytime,
I'm looking into things
Jim Wilson wrote:
It seemed like it'd be ok to commit what I have so far for 3d
instrumentation
in the boeing 747-400. Screen shot:
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/747-400-panel-01.png
Looks good, but it seems some .xml are missing in CVS. For example,
boeing747-400-pfd-jw.xml specified in
Speaking of 747's, has anyone made a JSBSim 747 FDM, yet? I've got some
data. If nobody has, I might give that a shot this evening. IT would at
least be a start.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Jim Wilson wrote:
It seemed like it'd be ok to commit what I have so far for 3d
instrumentation
in the boeing 747-400. Screen shot:
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/747-400-panel-01.png
Looks good, but it seems some .xml are missing in CVS.
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jim Wilson wrote:
It seemed like it'd be ok to commit what I have so far for 3d
instrumentation
in the boeing 747-400. Screen shot:
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/747-400-panel-01.png
Looks good, but it seems some .xml are missing in CVS. For
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I saw you'd reverted the target climb rate calcs in cvs and now that the old
alt hold is back I can see that the auto throttle response seems considerably
improved.
You may want to play with the gain factor and integral for throttle to. If
you find the
Speaking of 747's, has anyone made a JSBSim 747 FDM, yet? I've got some
data. If nobody has, I might give that a shot this evening. IT would at
least be a start.
From Roskam:
Wt= 636,000
Ixx= 1820
Iyy= 3310
Izz= 4970
Ixz= 97
Clbeta= -.16
Clp= -.34
Clr= .13
Cnbeta= .16
Cnp=
I
have to say, that this looks awesome. Very impressive!
Tim J
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Tim Jelliffe writes:
I have to say, that this looks awesome. Very impressive!
I'm not a big fan of me too messages, but in this case I have to
second this motion. :-)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project
Twin Citiescurt 'at' me.umn.edu
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Tim Jelliffe writes:
I have to say, that this looks awesome. Very impressive!
I'm not a big fan of me too messages, but in this case I have to
second this motion. :-)
Thanks for the good words (to everyone) :-) I'm just finishing up a KDEN to
KLAX
I've got that data, I think. Roskam got it from somewhere else. A lot of
his numbers came from an oft-cited NASA tech note that featured several
aircraft. I'd copy it, but it's huge.
Anyhow, for those guys that have made JSBSim models lately, do we have a
turbine for it?
From Roskam:
Wt=
FYI
I am currenrtly compiling against FreeGlut in my MinGW32
environment and expect that it would just work on Linux and
other 'X' platforms
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike
A. Harris
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:17 AM
To:
28 matches
Mail list logo
