Ok, I've managed to figure out things by myself. The problem was in
HStab options (Chord). The aircraft is now mostly flyable, you just
need to get used to. I'll prepare the package for the distribution in a
few days.
- Matevz
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
Hello guys.
I've been playing with
Jon Stockill wrote:
I've built some UK scenery using the SRTM-30 data mentioned the other day,
and it does seem to have a bit more shape to it than the same areas built
with the previous GTOPO30 - things like river valleys actually have some
slope to their sides now, where previously they were
It should do very nicely until something with a higher resolution is
available for the UK.
Any idea how Nanucq Faitmain is able to produce genuine high resolution MSFS
mesh scenery for
England (actually England, Scotland Wales) based, he says, on DTED1 data?
I understood that DTED1 data
Hi Fred
Have you had a look at the animations on the fokkers or just flowen them.
The models I have the animations are all out of wack but if I interchange
the Y and Z components of the centre statements they come closer to what
they should look like.
And if you have a look at the rudder axis
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Here is the xml file I have for the Fokker50
Ah I see.
This file isn't called from fokker-jsbsim-set.xml though, instead it
calls fokker50.ac directly because the file is just a copy of what I had
for the Fokker 100 at that moment.
Erik
On Sunday 24 August 2003 13:10, Jon Stockill wrote:
I've built some UK scenery using the SRTM-30 data mentioned the other day,
and it does seem to have a bit more shape to it than the same areas built
with the previous GTOPO30 - things like river valleys actually have some
slope to their sides
I think that my long-held [EMAIL PROTECTED] address will have to be
euthanised. It has been getting many tens of thousands of messages a
day, nearly all false bounces or (ironically) warnings from
virus-checking software, and even just the CPU load for the procmail
filtering for those messages (I
Hello guys.
I've been playing with my flight model for a very long time now and I
just don't think I am going to succeed. Could someone please look at the
j22-yasim.xml file or the whole aircraft project and help me out a bit.
http://www2.arnes.si/~mjekov/tmp/j22-yasim.xml
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:44:40 +0800,
Innis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I dont understand how the X axis on one model could be the Y axis on
another model
..math trick. Easy to visualize: Take 3 soda straws, in 3 different
colors. At one end of the first
Hello Innis,
It's important to remember that all animations are going to be relative to the
model origin, which is almost certainly not the same as the fdm CoG, or what
ever.
The fdm will need to provide the appropriate outputs to drive the animation
unless you animate on control input only.
I think that my long-held [EMAIL PROTECTED] address will have to be
euthanised. It has been getting many tens of thousands of messages a
Yeah, it's pretty bad. Microsoft ought to be completely embarrassed. For
those of you whose ISPs provide a filtering service I'd advise taking it. I
pay
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Faked lights (simple objects with red emission) are relatively
dark. To enhance visibility from farther distances I make them
bigger than they would be in reality and use simple shapes such
as ugly cubes to keep the poly count low. The cubes, however,
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Tony Peden writes:
Is Arnold not a citizen?
No person except a natural born citizen,
He is not a natural-born citizen.
or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of
this Constitution,
He was not a citizen at
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:06:35 -0400,
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please, people, if you have a choice, don't read e-mail with Outlook,
or at least, don't read the flightgear lists with that program. I
know that some of you are forced to use Outlook
Matthew Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I did my first solo this evening after almost 13hrs.
Congratulations!
After a few touch and go's and practice forced landings he asked me to come
to a full stop and said I'm fed-up of flying with you so I'm going to sit
in the tower for your last
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think that my long-held [EMAIL PROTECTED] address will have to be
euthanised. It has been getting many tens of thousands of messages a
day, nearly all false bounces or (ironically) warnings from
virus-checking software, and even just the CPU load for
Arnt Karlsen writes
Innis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I dont understand how the X axis on one model could be the Y axis on
another model
..math trick.
It certainly is when the left aileron is 10 metres away from the left wing
it is supposed to be
That would explain why the model kept crashing the sim with incorrect names
for the animations.
If you would like I can do the xml file for you.This way if the animations
dont work correctly when you try them we can see what the problem is.
It would be my pleasure to do them.
Cheers
Innis
Erik
Innis Cunningham wrote:
That would explain why the model kept crashing the sim with incorrect
names for the animations.
If you would like I can do the xml file for you.This way if the
animations dont work correctly when you try them we can see what the
problem is.
It would be my pleasure to do
Mally wrote:
David
I'm very sorry to hear about your plague of false virus warnings. I get a few of
these myself, but nothing on the scale you're seeing. The
possibility/probability that it will force you to drop megginson.com is very
unwelcome news.
I don't know if you intentionally said Outlook
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Hi Fred
Have you had a look at the animations on the fokkers or just flowen them.
The models I have the animations are all out of wack but if I
interchange the Y and Z components of the centre statements they come
closer to what they should look like.
And if you have a
I did a bit of background research on the packaging / bundling issue,
partly for my own curiosity, and in the vague hope of helping someone
who wants to take a crack at this..
Essentially, anyone who's installed add-ons for MSFS (any version)
knows what a pain it is, and uninstalling them is
Oh lord. And they are going to ditch Outlook Express in favor of
Outlook. Will they ever learn?
I wasn't aware of that. Is there an announcement somewhere?
Mally
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus
Using the latest CVS, I didn't encounter any fog dissappearences when
turning to the sun. Has this been fixed now?
I also noticed a major loss in framerate in comparison to 14 days old
build! Is this the golden gate bridge and some other cookies in San
Francisco or does this have to do
Mally wrote:
Oh lord. And they are going to ditch Outlook Express in favor of
Outlook. Will they ever learn?
I wasn't aware of that. Is there an announcement somewhere?
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/13/238245mode=threadtid=109tid=113tid=126tid=187tid=95
Erik
James Turner wrote:
I did a bit of background research on the packaging / bundling issue,
partly for my own curiosity, and in the vague hope of helping someone
who wants to take a crack at this..
This is a nice summing of the possibilities.
As a unix user the first thing that comes to my mind is
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
Using the latest CVS, I didn't encounter any fog dissappearences when
turning to the sun. Has this been fixed now?
Yes, there is a fix in CVS which fixes it. But it's not ideal.
I also noticed a major loss in framerate in comparison to 14 days old
build! Is this the golden
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, David Megginson wrote:
Excellent. Would you be able to post some before and after
screenshots?
I'll see if I can find some nice comparisons.
On a separate note, are you using the latest CVS of TerraGear? I
tried it last week, and the generated scenery completely
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Lee Elliott wrote:
That's great - me want - is it available from anywhere?
There's a few issues to work out. Once I have a build which appears
complete I'll pack it all up for you.
--
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Back from holidays, back to FlightGear 'quality control' :-)
To prevent the following error I'd suggest the attached small patch:
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/FlightGear/src/Main'
if g++ -march=pentiumpro -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/Include -I../..
-I../../src
Outlook is actually a more capable version of Outlook Express (thus the name
Express). I use Outlook. I haven't had any problems with it. I just don't
open the wrong kinds of attachments. Problem solved. Also, I use the
filtering service my ISP makes available.
Jon
-Original Message-
Mally [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyone using Outlook Express should ensure that they are using the latest
version, Outlook Express 6, and that they have the appropriate options set in
the Security, Send and Receive tabs of the Tools, Options... dialog.
Outlook (a different program), remains
Jon Berndt writes:
Yeah, it's pretty bad. Microsoft ought to be completely
embarrassed. For those of you whose ISPs provide a filtering
service I'd advise taking it. I pay about $2 a month for this
service and it has caught ALL of the virii headed for my Inbox.
I regularly filter both
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 11:57 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
As a unix user the first thing that comes to my mind is off course tar
and gzip (or maybe bzip2). I am aware of the limitations of the tar
format, but the scan once for a TOC method seemed fast enough for me.
For very large archives,
Jim
The options shouldn't be there. The whole idea of a mime-type (or file
extension type) support in an email attachment, that comes to the user from
outside, containing executable code or script that has full access to the
system, which is either either launched automatically or clicked
Ok, I made my first public version of J-22 (some minor issues though,
but nothing show-stopping). Can someone please put it to CVS.
A screenshot:
http://www2.arnes.si/~mjekov/tmp/j22.jpg
J-22 set, yasim fdm, hud, model + textures, model wrapper:
http://www2.arnes.si/~mjekov/tmp/j22.tar.gz
-
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Good question I would have the one that shiped with 9.2. If there are
updates in the CVS since then I would not have them.
Anyway we will see how the F50 turns out.
With the F50 the gear does retract into the engine nacelle??.If it does
the wheels are to wide as they
Thanks. It looks as if they're not exactly ditching Outlook Express, just not
doing any further development. I can't see users switching en masse to a paid
version of Outlook as MS appear to hope. It's more likely that they'll switch to
alternative (non-MS) email clients, which I'm sure many of
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 02:44 pm, Erik Hofman wrote:
Not necessary, it is mainly the number of files that causes the
slowdown. You can jump from one info block to another without actually
reading any date in between them (there is a pointer in the current
info block that points to the
James Turner wrote:
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 11:57 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
As a unix user the first thing that comes to my mind is off course tar
and gzip (or maybe bzip2). I am aware of the limitations of the tar
format, but the scan once for a TOC method seemed fast enough for me.
For
David Megginson wrote:
I'm curious -- your airport is a very short grass strip, but it has a
control tower?
Yes, but is still a Radio only airfield with no ATC. The tower is a small
affair that I'm sure isn't capable of observing the entire circuit since it's
800ft AAL and downwind extends
Mally wrote:
Thanks. It looks as if they're not exactly ditching Outlook Express, just not
doing any further development. I can't see users switching en masse to a paid
version of Outlook as MS appear to hope. It's more likely that they'll switch to
alternative (non-MS) email clients, which I'm
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, David Megginson wrote:
Excellent. Would you be able to post some before and after
screenshots?
Done. http://flightgear.stockill.org/scenery/
There's not *huge* differences (except where there's problems), and static
images don't really show it off, but it does feel far
James Turner wrote:
Oh, I just did some browsing of the SSG loaders they're full of
fopen / fseek calls. Damn. Much work to be done there, I think.
Yep, although the AC3D load doesn't use seek. I was thinking of moving
the SGI texture loader and AC3D model loader over to SimGear and
Erik Hofman writes:
James Turner wrote:
Oh, I just did some browsing of the SSG loaders they're full of
fopen / fseek calls. Damn. Much work to be done there, I think.
Yep, although the AC3D load doesn't use seek. I was thinking of moving
the SGI texture loader and AC3D model
Alex Perry wrote:
Congratulations. What are you training in ?
Thanks! Mostly 152's but I've done a couple hours in a 150 too.
From: David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For me, the first solo cross-country was the best part of training.
First solo was an important moment, of course, but it
Jon Stockill writes:
Done. http://flightgear.stockill.org/scenery/
DNS lookup is failing on flightgear.stockill.org.
All the best,
David
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
If nothing else we should first work on being able to have completely
self contained aircraft trees (rather than needing a -set.xml file in
one directory (possibly the aircraft fdm config in another direcotry)
and everything else in a separate area.)
The directory layout
Jon Stockill wrote:
The only thing I've noticed as being a bit odd recently is that the
compass on the top of the 2d panel has vanished behind the 3d model. I
can't recall exactly when this happened though.
This happened after I disabled the depth buffer *writes* (not check) for
the 2D panel to
Erik Hofman writes:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
If nothing else we should first work on being able to have completely
self contained aircraft trees (rather than needing a -set.xml file in
one directory (possibly the aircraft fdm config in another direcotry)
and everything else in a separate
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 14:51:50 +0200,
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jon Stockill wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Erik Hofman wrote:
Regarding ZIP files, is it legal to use the compression algorithm
without any limitations at the moment (for example GIF
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:14:11 -0500,
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was forced to do a bit of mail server reconfig this morning that
could have resulted in lost messages for about an hour or two. If you
..mentioning outage start and end time might be
Ok, I made my first public version of J-22 (some minor issues though,
but nothing show-stopping). Can someone please put it to CVS.
A screenshot:
http://www2.arnes.si/~mjekov/tmp/j22.jpg
J-22 set, yasim fdm, hud, model + textures, model wrapper:
http://www2.arnes.si/~mjekov/tmp/j22.tar.gz
- Matevz
- We would move each of the -set.xml to also live in the individual
aircraft tree.
- Then to install an aircraft you need to drop the aircraft's
directory somewhere inside the top level Aircraft directory. We
could have abitrary subdirectories to organize by aircraft type or
livery or era
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
Ok, I made my first public version of J-22 (some minor issues though,
but nothing show-stopping). Can someone please put it to CVS.
Committed.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabien ILLIDE wrote:
There will be a strike this 27th :
http://wiki.ael.be/index.php/BigDemo27aug
That's my birthday.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Erik Hofman writes:
Fabien ILLIDE wrote:
There will be a strike this 27th :
http://wiki.ael.be/index.php/BigDemo27aug
That's my birthday.
Shoot, I'll be busy patenting FlightGear that day so I won't be able
to make either party. :-(
(j/k of course!)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson HumanFIRST
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Erik Hofman writes:
Fabien ILLIDE wrote:
There will be a strike this 27th :
http://wiki.ael.be/index.php/BigDemo27aug
That's my birthday.
I'll do even more noize for your birthday !
Have an happy one !
Shoot, I'll be busy patenting FlightGear that day so I won't be able
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
I think at some point (maybe sooner rather than later?) we need to do
some tweaking to the aircraft directly layout so it is possible to:
a) make everything related to a particular plane be contained in a
Fabien ILLIDE wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Erik Hofman writes:
Fabien ILLIDE wrote:
There will be a strike this 27th :
http://wiki.ael.be/index.php/BigDemo27aug
That's my birthday.
I'll do even more noize for your birthday !
Have an happy one !
Thanks.
Maybe this event will help you to
Am Montag, 25. August 2003 20:43 schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
I thought the LZW patent had expired?
At least not in Europe. You'll have to wait until 2004.
..Europe??? Where is that?. ;-)
..for our US website, we're ok:
USA Where is that? :-o
Regards,
Oliver C.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Montag, 25. August 2003 20:43 schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
I thought the LZW patent had expired?
At least not in Europe. You'll have to wait until 2004.
..Europe??? Where is that?. ;-)
..for our US website, we're ok:
USA Where is that? :-o
Ok,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Montag, 25. August 2003 20:43 schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
I thought the LZW patent had expired?
At least not in Europe. You'll have to wait until 2004.
..Europe??? Where is that?. ;-)
..for our US website, we're ok:
USA Where is that? :-o
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Ok, if you start at Disney world,
That's in Florida. I always remember it as Disney *LA*nd in LA. I
think that your directions led to Mexico, and that you suggested we
speak mainly Spanish in Canada.
All the best,
David
Hi,
Sorry for be a bit oftopic.
The European Parlement will vote on software patents this 1st september.
As FlightGear is a Libre Software, I think it's NOT in our interest.
If you feel concern, and want to help us, please sign the online petition
at http://petition.eurolinux.org/ (it's
65 matches
Mail list logo
