Re: [Flightgear-devel] building models

2002-10-31 Thread James Turner
On Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 02:22 pm, David Megginson wrote: Absolutely, though I wouldn't call it a complex structure (four polys). It will look a little silly without the surrounding tall buildings, though. This got me thinking. The dynamic scenery can place arbitrary models, so

Panel interaction (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] ADF change?)

2002-10-26 Thread James Turner
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 02:23 am, David Megginson wrote: Curtis L. Olson writes: What would be really useful when you get into modeling push buttons is to be able to model a switch where it is true while the mouse is depressed and then immediately returns to false when the mouse

Re: [Flightgear-devel] JavaScript!

2002-06-28 Thread James Turner
A couple of comments on the scripting issue: JavaScript is a really nice language, but you aren't going to get a very small runtime without losing useful things (like regular expressions). However, the sources are readily available, as has already been noted. My day job is working with Mozilla

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Capturing warnings

2002-06-25 Thread James Turner
On Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 01:31 am, Andy Ross wrote: Jonathan Polley wrote: I cannot redirect stderr via 'command 2 file' on my Mac, so the easy solution was out. I did find that the following command works: Rubbish. Sure you can. You just have to run a real shell. :) Seriously,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ANN: SGPropertyChangeListener

2002-06-18 Thread James Turner
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, at 02:38 am, David Megginson wrote: The node argument is as follows: 1. If the value of an existing property node has been modified, it is the node itself. 2. If a property has been added or removed, it is the property's parent. Hmm, how is the listener

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot planning [was RE: progress]

2002-06-14 Thread James Turner
On Friday, June 14, 2002, at 04:19 am, Jim Wilson wrote: Armed vs. Active modes: Active modes are the only ones that affect control surfaces. Armed modes select an impending active mode that may or may not get triggered, depending on if the condition for that mode is satisfied. Note

[Flightgear-devel] Autopilot planning [was RE: progress]

2002-06-11 Thread James Turner
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, at 02:34 am, Jim Wilson wrote: Not a problem...give me a day or two to get things together. Probably there won't be as much changed as there will be added, but some of the settings need to be exposed in the property tree. yeah, this is basically what I was

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot planning [was RE: progress]

2002-06-11 Thread James Turner
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, at 02:27 pm, Jim Wilson wrote: If I'm not mistaken (and I easily could be) the FMC would usually just feed the autopilot heading and speed data when using non-radio-stack NAV modes. The FMC monitors the course and the AP only needs to follow the commands

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: progress

2002-06-10 Thread James Turner
On Monday, June 10, 2002, at 05:35 am, John Wojnaroski wrote: Well, I've been working on a Multi-function Control Display Unit (MCDU) which connects to the FMC and provides manual control of the nav receivers and other aircraft systems. Next major effort is adding ability to insert and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: progress

2002-06-10 Thread James Turner
ahOn Mon, 2002-06-10 at 15:58, Jim Wilson wrote: James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: (I want to get the flight-plans hooked up to the existing auto-pilot code, which isn't really designed to look like a 'big jet' model of course, though it seems you already have code *somewhere

Re: [Flightgear-devel] HSIs

2002-06-07 Thread James Turner
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 22:42, Curtis L. Olson wrote: You are in luck. :-) Hmm, I'm quite worried that my brain didn't register that this instrument was an HSI (given that I've used the 310 and DC-3 quite a bit). I think maybe I've been using (virtual) digital HSIs too much, and forgot they can

RE: [Flightgear-devel] HSIs

2002-06-07 Thread James Turner
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 23:45, Norman Vine wrote: FWIW crosstrack error on a 'spherical earth' was computed in 'some' navigation instruments long before 'digital' computers were used in these devices. trig values for an angle can be determined from an 'analog' device and the rest is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Parsing Lon/lat strings

2002-06-05 Thread James Turner
On Tuesday, June 4, 2002, at 01:22 am, Andy Ross wrote: Heh, that actually sounded kinda fun, so I tried it. Here's the smallest parser for your syntax that I could come up with, in good old obfuscatorial C style. It sits pleasingly close to the line between elegance and perversity.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] VSI units mismatch panel/steam

2002-06-03 Thread James Turner
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 03:18, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Cockpit/steam.cxx exports /steam/vertical-speed-fpm and ties it to FGSteam::get_VSI_fps It seems like there is a mismatch here between fpsecond and fpminute. The fdm exports /velocities/vertical-speed-fps aka climb_rate. The vsi

[Flightgear-devel] Parsing Lon/lat strings

2002-06-03 Thread James Turner
Further to my flight plan hacking (which is coming along nicely): Is there any code in Sim/FlightGear to do generic conversion of a lat / lon string into a decimal degree value? I.e, something that would accept and convert some / all of the following: N50 23.1 -96.32 E00 06.3 into a

[Flightgear-devel] Routes / Flight-plans

2002-06-02 Thread James Turner
Following some recent bad experiences with commercial simulators, and the prospect of simulating (from an FDM perspective) a modern jet in FlightGear, I am planning to work on some features which might eventually let me use FG for the stuff I enjoy flying. As a starting point, there are a few

[Flightgear-devel] Autopilot climb modes

2002-05-29 Thread James Turner
On Wednesday, May 29, 2002, at 04:06 am, Alex Perry wrote: Just something to file away ... big jets should have a climb mode in which the power is regulated to max climb by the autothrottles and speed is held with the pitch control. Is this the mode activated by the CLB / CON switch (on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot climb modes

2002-05-29 Thread James Turner
[I assume Thomas will reply anyway, but I want to check I have this right (from using the PMDG 757/767/777s which are supposed to be just about the most accurate systems models out there)] On Wednesday, May 29, 2002, at 02:23 pm, Jim Wilson wrote: So if in SPD mode the selected speed was

[Flightgear-devel] yasim solution issues

2002-05-26 Thread James Turner
Just noting that the YAsim 747 gets a solution failure for me (updated 15 minutes ago). The DC3 works great now, however, except that the VSI seems to be reporting bogus values (it sits at the maximum climb rate stop). [tries to test the yasim c310 to see if the VSI thing is a panel bug..]

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Problem report on release 0.7.9

2002-02-23 Thread James Turner
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 20:52, Curtis L. Olson wrote: This may or may not be related but when I start up at an airport for which i have no scenery, the elevation is below 0. At EHAM it is -17 ft as shown in /position/altitude-ft. Actually, when an ocean tile is automatically generated,

<    1   2