Re: [Flightgear-devel] Multiplayer RFC -- wire protocol spec --preliminary

2003-11-13 Thread John Barrett
- Original Message - From: Gerhard Wesp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 9:29 AM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Multiplayer RFC -- wire protocol spec --preliminary Unless there are objections, byte order

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Multiplayer RFC -- wire protocol spec -- preliminary

2003-11-13 Thread Gene Buckle
Unless there are objections, byte order is little endian, and floats are intel FPU standard (ok -- i'm making it easy on the PCs that will likely be used to run display clients :) Is there any specific reason not to use human readable messages (i.e., ASCII)? It's a waste of bandwidth.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Multiplayer RFC -- wire protocol spec -- preliminary

2003-11-07 Thread Erik Hofman
John Barrett wrote: Here is a quick and dirty 1st cut at a wire protocol definition, and some requirements for the message handling classes that will implement the protocol Unless there are objections, byte order is little endian, and floats are intel FPU standard (ok -- i'm making it easy on the

[Flightgear-devel] Multiplayer RFC -- wire protocol spec -- preliminary

2003-11-06 Thread John Barrett
Here is a quick and dirty 1st cut at a wire protocol definition, and some requirements for the message handling classes that will implement the protocolPreliminary FlightGear Server (FGS) wire protocol specification 0xFFEscape prefix for 0xF? bytes in the data next byte is inverted,