Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Erik Hofman
Hof Markus wrote: hi, I've done some changes to A320, works fine, but auto coordination is worst. Does anyone know how to calculate rudder pos due to bank or whatever to fly a curve? There is this easy approach: fgfs --enable-auto-coordination I need some delta(???) to do correction of this

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Hof Markus
I've done some changes to A320, works fine, but auto coordination is worst. Does anyone know how to calculate rudder pos due to bank or whatever to fly a curve? There is this easy approach: fgfs --enable-auto-coordination see below I need some delta(???) to do correction of this delta

[Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: docs/Model fgfs-model-howto.html, 1.4, 1.5

2004-01-08 Thread Martin Spott
Hello Erik, Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=http://www.flightgear.org/default.css; [...] + a href=http://www.flightgear.org/;img id=titlebar src=http://www.flightgear.org/images/fglogosm.jpg; alt=/a You probably might want to use

[Flightgear-devel] Dead links on the FG website

2004-01-08 Thread Frederic BOUVIER
Hi Curt, the 'Contributors' link give 404. The link 'thanks.html' should be 'thanks.shtml'. Regards, -Fred ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

[Flightgear-devel] jsbsim

2004-01-08 Thread Hof Markus
hi, is there a possibility to build a Differentiator of a property analog to the integrator? I did not find somethink like this in the docs for fcs-components. I want to build a d/d(t) of a property. Is this the GRADIENT type of COMPONENT, which is not impl. yet ? for speed properties there is

RE: [Flightgear-devel] jsbsim

2004-01-08 Thread Jon Berndt
hi, is there a possibility to build a Differentiator of a property analog to the integrator? I did not find somethink like this in the docs for fcs-components. I want to build a d/d(t) of a property. Is this the GRADIENT type of COMPONENT, which is not impl. yet ? for speed properties

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread David Megginson
Hof Markus wrote: IMHO this could not be right! Example: you fly a turn at low bank angle lets say 5°, so you will need no (or very less) aileron to hold the bank. (aileron = 0) but at 5° Bank you have to use rudder to fly a correct(!) turn, and rudder=aileron/ 2 = 0/2 = 0 != rudder needed. As

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Hof Markus
Hof Markus wrote: IMHO this could not be right! Example: you fly a turn at low bank angle lets say 5°, so you will need no (or very less) aileron to hold the bank. (aileron = 0) but at 5° Bank you have to use rudder to fly a correct(!) turn, and rudder=aileron/ 2 = 0/2 = 0 != rudder

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Jim Wilson
Hof Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm not sure of this, but I think you are right! I'll think about. I tried on A320 to fly turn at 25°BNK an ball was never centered! even if BNK did'nt change. Anyway: to keep the ball centered, as you said, I'll need a rudder due to adverse yaw (and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Erik Hofman
Jon Berndt wrote: For JSBSim aircraft, of course, you can by adding in the appropriate control channel in the flight control description for hte aircraft. I think eromatic automatically adds a yaw damper to aircraft created for JSBSim that way (Dave C.?) The X-15 aircraft has a SAS (Satbility

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Matthew Law
As David said, there is very little adverse yaw from aileron input on modern aircraft designs. Now, I have no experience of anything but Cessnas but on an A320 for example, I would be surprised if the aileron input required to perform say, a 20 deg. bank turn would require *any* rudder input

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Jon S Berndt
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:56:27 +0100 Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jon Berndt wrote: For JSBSim aircraft, of course, you can by adding in the appropriate control channel in the flight control description for hte aircraft. I think eromatic automatically adds a yaw damper to aircraft

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread David Megginson
Matthew Law wrote: flameproof jacket on So maybe the problem could be with the FDM representing the wrong adverse yaw amount for that aircraft? /flameproof jacket on As someone else mentioned, it's simply a matter of implementing a yaw-damper in the autopilot -- think of it as a device that

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Jim Wilson
Jon Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: It would be nice to have that feature [yaw damper] added to the autopilot code. Usually it is activated on the ground and then turned off only to keep it from screwing up any kick-out on landing. The activating/deactivating could be handled manually or

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Andy Ross
Jim Wilson wrote: Same as solution for dutch roll effect. No? Not exactly. An autocoordinator moves the rudder to counteract slip angle. A yaw damper moves the rudder to counteract yaw rate, which is the time derivative of slip angle. An aircraft can be held in a slip and a yaw damper won't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread John Wojnaroski
Given the description of the 'goal' for the problem (keep the ball centered), it does seem the idea of using some function of the yaw acceleration would give sensible results, but I am not a FCS designer My 2 cents... Adverse yaw is created by the difference in the drag produced by

[Flightgear-devel] 3D aircraft model origins

2004-01-08 Thread Paul Surgeon
Is position 0,0,0 of an aircraft model the same point as 0,0,0 of the JSBSim FDM in FlightGear? I know the JSBSim FDM defines everything using the nose as the origin but I'm trying to figure out if my model and the FDM are lined up correctly. BTW: What is this I hear about plib snapping

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 3D aircraft model origins

2004-01-08 Thread Erik Hofman
Paul Surgeon wrote: Is position 0,0,0 of an aircraft model the same point as 0,0,0 of the JSBSim FDM in FlightGear? I know the JSBSim FDM defines everything using the nose as the origin but I'm trying to figure out if my model and the FDM are lined up correctly. No JSBSim does not. JSBSim uses

[Flightgear-devel] Website suggestion

2004-01-08 Thread Paul Surgeon
Would it be possible to create a web based repository of data that we find on the Net or elsewhere? Sort of a central repository where everyone can go and look for info first before they start crawling the Net for hours. A lot of the FlightGear/JSBSim developers find useful sites with info on

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Website suggestion

2004-01-08 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Paul Surgeon -- Thursday 08 January 2004 20:13: I am thinking along the lines of a database driven web interface where we can all submit useful links (URLs, books, etc) with descriptions and categories. Then people can search for stuff using keywords. Not directly a database and only

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 3D aircraft model origins

2004-01-08 Thread Paul Surgeon
On Thursday, 8 January 2004 21:03, Erik Hofman wrote: Paul Surgeon wrote: Is position 0,0,0 of an aircraft model the same point as 0,0,0 of the JSBSim FDM in FlightGear? I know the JSBSim FDM defines everything using the nose as the origin but I'm trying to figure out if my model and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Dead links on the FG website

2004-01-08 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Frederic BOUVIER writes: Hi Curt, the 'Contributors' link give 404. The link 'thanks.html' should be 'thanks.shtml'. Thanks for catching this ... Curt. -- Curtis Olson HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project Twin Citiescurt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at'

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Hof Markus
Adverse yaw is created by the difference in the drag produced by the ailerons when banking the aircraft where the 'down aileron' (which raises the wing) is subject to the higher velocity (energy) of the relative wind moving under the wing and the 'up aileron feeling less drag from air moving

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 3D aircraft model origins

2004-01-08 Thread Erik Hofman
Paul Surgeon wrote: On Thursday, 8 January 2004 21:03, Erik Hofman wrote: Paul Surgeon wrote: Is position 0,0,0 of an aircraft model the same point as 0,0,0 of the JSBSim FDM in FlightGear? I know the JSBSim FDM defines everything using the nose as the origin but I'm trying to figure out if my

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread David Megginson
Hof Markus wrote: It depends on A/C aerodynamics wheter the plane starts to turn w/ bank angle != 0 or not. Usually the plane does not, so FCPC is mixing some rudder to make the plane turn. Which force would else make the plane turn? And I'm sure Bank Angle does not, may help a little bit. In

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 3D aircraft model origins

2004-01-08 Thread Paul Surgeon
On Thursday, 8 January 2004 21:54, Erik Hofman wrote: Ehrm, I just discovered it is not very helpful what I said. I should have said that the *3d models* origin (0, 0, 0) would be places at the FDM models static CG. The CG of the FDM is (again) relative to the arbitrary reference point (which

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 3D aircraft model origins

2004-01-08 Thread Erik Hofman
Paul Surgeon wrote: Shucks ... I must be tired or something because this is getting more and more confusing by the minute. What is this arbitrary point you are referring to? It is a location which you can choose. You can use the CG, the nose of the aircraft, the center location of the front of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 3D aircraft model origins

2004-01-08 Thread Jon S Berndt
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:34:44 +0100 Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Surgeon wrote: Shucks ... I must be tired or something because this is getting more and more confusing by the minute. What is this arbitrary point you are referring to? It is a location which you can choose. You can

[Flightgear-devel] autopilot, maintaining elevation

2004-01-08 Thread Seamus Thomas Carroll
Hi, I am playing with the autopilot and maintaining an altitidue above sea level works great. Is there a method for maintaining an elevation above the ground? Seamus ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Flightgear-devel] autopilot, maintaining elevation

2004-01-08 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Seamus Thomas Carroll writes: I am playing with the autopilot and maintaining an altitidue above sea level works great. Is there a method for maintaining an elevation above the ground? Ctrl-t will toggle a mode that attempts to maintain the current altitude above ground. The algorithm is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination : Derivatives in FCS

2004-01-08 Thread Jon S Berndt
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:41:00 +0100 Hof Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Other topic: Are there any suggestions about how to build a d/d(t) of a property in fdm markus Markus: For JSBSim, you can use the flight control components. This is a quick reply, so maybe I have not thought this all the

[Flightgear-devel] Linux machines

2004-01-08 Thread Jon S Berndt
Dell doesn't seem to market machines with Linux installed anymore, do they? Can anyone point me to a major manufacturer that does? Jon ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux machines

2004-01-08 Thread Andy Ross
Jon S. Berndt wrote: Dell doesn't seem to market machines with Linux installed anymore, do they? Can anyone point me to a major manufacturer that does? You can get servers from IBM and HP (and maybe others) preinstalled with Red Hat or SuSE's enterprise offerings, but I'm not aware of anyone

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread John Wojnaroski
- Original Message - From: David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination Hof Markus wrote: It depends on A/C aerodynamics wheter the plane starts to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] autopilot, maintaining elevation

2004-01-08 Thread Lee Elliott
On Thursday 08 January 2004 21:40, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Seamus Thomas Carroll writes: I am playing with the autopilot and maintaining an altitidue above sea level works great. Is there a method for maintaining an elevation above the ground? Ctrl-t will toggle a mode that attempts

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Andy Ross
John Wojnaroski wrote: Believe it or not, what makes an airplane turn is LIFT... think about it. Well, OK. But let's not get too pedantic about things. What makes any object change velocity is force. The best and most efficient way to generate force with an airplane is with the wings

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread David Megginson
John Wojnaroski wrote: Believe it or not, what makes an airplane turn is LIFT... think about it. Same thing -- one wing develops more lift than the other, the plane banks and wants to slip sideways, but as it does the horizontal stabilizer develops (sideways) lift and swings the nose around

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Andy Ross
David Megginson wrote: In the planes I've flown -- admittedly not a wide range of types -- holding rudder generally induces a bank before there's a significant change in flight direction (as opposed to just heading). Right, you need to hold it in the slip with opposing ailerons

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Jon S Berndt
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:37:25 -0500 David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Wojnaroski wrote: Believe it or not, what makes an airplane turn is LIFT... think about it. Same thing -- one wing develops more lift than the other, the plane banks and wants to slip sideways, but as it does the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread David Megginson
Andy Ross wrote: An aircraft held in a level sideslip will turn, for example, due to the side forces caused by the slip, no wing lift need be involved. In the planes I've flown -- admittedly not a wide range of types -- holding rudder generally induces a bank before there's a significant change

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux machines

2004-01-08 Thread Gene Buckle
Dell doesn't seem to market machines with Linux installed anymore, do they? Can anyone point me to a major manufacturer that does? Actually they do. I just got a Dell 2650 with Redhat 9 on it. However, they may not offer them in the home market. (The 2650 is an SMP machine). g.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Hof Markus
David Megginson wrote: In the planes I've flown -- admittedly not a wide range of types -- holding rudder generally induces a bank before there's a significant change in flight direction (as opposed to just heading). Right, you need to hold it in the slip with opposing ailerons

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Jon S Berndt
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:09:08 +0100 Hof Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Take the A320 (on FG) and watch the ball. All I want to know, which property to use for trigger function to keep the ball centered. since you discussed this topic so deeply, I'm sure someone can name me the property... I've

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Andy Ross
Hof Markus wrote: I'll think about this on weekend, but anyway, wheter to use rudder or not. Take the A320 (on FG) and watch the ball. All I want to know, which property to use for trigger function to keep the ball centered. since you discussed this topic so deeply, I'm sure someone can

[Flightgear-devel] Fw: Properties Tree and TSR2

2004-01-08 Thread Richard Hornby
- Original Message - From: Richard Hornby To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:28 PM Subject: Properties Tree and TSR2 Can somebody help here? I am trying to see the properties tree using telnetto localhost 5500. I don't see anything in the (telnet or fg)

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Properties Tree and TSR2

2004-01-08 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Richard Hornby -- Friday 09 January 2004 00:45: I am trying to see the properties tree using telnet to localhost 5500. I don't see anything in the (telnet or fg) console window. Have you told fgfs to listen to telnet connections? $ fgfs --telnet=5500 $ telnet localhost 5500 Trying

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination : Derivatives in FCS

2004-01-08 Thread Hof Markus
Quoting Jon S Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Other topic: Are there any suggestions about how to build a d/d(t) of a property in fdm Markus: For JSBSim, you can use the flight control components. This is a quick reply, so maybe I have not thought this all the way out, yet. But, I suspect

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux machines

2004-01-08 Thread Jim Wilson
Jon S Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Dell doesn't seem to market machines with Linux installed anymore, do they? Can anyone point me to a major manufacturer that does? Compaq has been doing it the longest. We've been using their stuff since they bought DEC a few years ago (DEC was the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 3D aircraft model origins

2004-01-08 Thread Jim Wilson
Jon S Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Within the FDM our math model really doesn't care about the specific locations of anything. We really only care about the relative distances from the aircraft CG of things like the wheels, the wings, the aerodynamic reference point, the pilot eyepoint,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread John Wojnaroski
Andy Ross wrote: John Wojnaroski wrote: Believe it or not, what makes an airplane turn is LIFT... think about it. Well, OK. But let's not get too pedantic about things. Well, excuse me with an aircraft. An aircraft held in a level sideslip will turn, for example, due to the side

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread John Wojnaroski
Hof Markus wrote: sorry guys, I don't know what to belive in anymore :) I'll think about this on weekend, but anyway, wheter to use rudder or not. Take the A320 (on FG) and watch the ball. All I want to know, which property to use for trigger function to keep the ball centered. since you

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread Andy Ross
John Wojnaroski wrote: Andy Ross wrote: with an aircraft. An aircraft held in a level sideslip will turn, for example, due to the side forces caused by the slip, no wing lift need be involved. Define 'level', if the wings are level, REALLY level, the rudder will produce a torgue to turn

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autocoordination

2004-01-08 Thread John Wojnaroski
Everything you say is true. But none of it means that the aircraft won't turn, which is all I said. You can make an aircraft turn with forces that aren't produced by the wings (which should be obvious, since some aircraft don't have wings yet can still turn). I tried to be precise, but