On Sunday 20 July 2003 02:23, Jim Wilson wrote:
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I saw you'd reverted the target climb rate calcs in cvs and now that the
old
alt hold is back I can see that the auto throttle response seems
considerably
improved.
You may want to play with the
Ta for the info. I found that the auto-throttle holds the set speed very
well, even between different a/c types and it was very easy to match speeds
between them. Using multiplay, with a B-52 and a YF-23 both set to the same
ap speed, there was hardly any drift between them and it got me
On Sunday 20 July 2003 15:16, Major A wrote:
Ta for the info. I found that the auto-throttle holds the set speed very
well, even between different a/c types and it was very easy to match
speeds
between them. Using multiplay, with a B-52 and a YF-23 both set to the
same
ap speed,
On Saturday 19 July 2003 05:21, Jim Wilson wrote:
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
With the YF-23 it's
very obvious.
Hi Lee,
In a separate message I've sent a patch to backout the target climb rate
fix.
I was able to stabalize the A/P by making adjustments with the fix, but the
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now. Go ahead and
use the patch I posted last night. What I was shooting for was a little more
smoothness when switching from V/S to
On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:00, Jim Wilson wrote:
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now. Go ahead
and
use the patch I posted last night. What I was shooting
On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:33, Lee Elliott wrote:
On Saturday 19 July 2003 14:00, Jim Wilson wrote:
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Could youi give me a quick nod when there's a new vers to try?
After looking some more, I'm going to hold off on that for now. Go ahead
and
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I saw you'd reverted the target climb rate calcs in cvs and now that the old
alt hold is back I can see that the auto throttle response seems considerably
improved.
You may want to play with the gain factor and integral for throttle to. If
you find the
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The autopilot altitude hold seems a bit messed up though since yesterday -
quite bad porpoising - I checked that with the 747, a4, c-172 and a couple of
mine. Terrain following still seems ok though. I doubt this is due to the
replay stuff.
Lee,
On Friday 18 July 2003 13:30, Jim Wilson wrote:
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The autopilot altitude hold seems a bit messed up though since yesterday -
quite bad porpoising - I checked that with the 747, a4, c-172 and a couple
of
mine. Terrain following still seems ok though.
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hello Jim,
Sorry, I missed this post at first. The porpoising is certainly related to
the elev_adj_factor - the lower it is the worse the problem. It's hardly
apparent with the c-172 or 747 but more so with the a4.
Try increasing then. Generally
11 matches
Mail list logo