* syd -- Thursday 26 October 2006 03:00:
since it's my aircraft , it's probably something I did in
the last update ,
No. This is a new error message has been added a few days ago.
It's no longer allowed to write a nil value to a property.
Nasal would turn the nil into a NaN in the C++ space,
Hi AJ
hello Franz,
first of all: I have never seen such a good organized code and system
like fgfs! Also the community is really cooperatively. Thanks to all!
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:08:57AM +0100, AJ MacLeod wrote:
[...]
key n=67
nameC/name
descCatapult Launch Command./desc
Great news! Thank you very much for the porting.
The rain stuff as well as the render surface stuff is nothing too complicated
and already available in osg, but that needs to be done and tested.
[SNIP]
The 3d clouds are something to think about. osg can assist here but I need to
think about
fgfs does now emit a signal when the FDM has been initialized.
This can be used to initialize code that depends on the FDM.
setlistener(/sim/signals/fdm-initialized, func {
... stuff that depends on the FDM ...
});
This is preferable to setttimer(func { ...}, 0) in many cases.
It
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:56:24 +0200
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Yurik V. Nikiforoff -- Wednesday 25 October 2006 07:24:
There are two problems around this issue.
These two problems sound exactly like the ones that we had with
another light patch a while ago. It was done the
* Jean-Yves Lefort -- Thursday 26 October 2006 15:38:
This one:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jylefort/flightgear-aircraft-lights.diff
Yes. The main difference is that your code looks very clean. :-)
m.
-
Using Tomcat
Hello,
can someone of the fgfs developers tell me, how I can establish a
bidirectional protocoll connection (with tcp)?
I tried the following, which results in an error:
$ /usr/games/fgfs --generic=socket,bi,2,localhost,,tcp,fg_sqawk.xml
Model Author: Unknown
Creation Date: 2002-01-01
--- Holger Wirtz wrote:
Hello,
I tried the following, which results in an error:
$ /usr/games/fgfs --generic=socket,bi,2,localhost,,tcp,fg_sqawk.xml
You shouldn't include the .xml on the end of your commandline argument.
Where do I have to put the protocol defintion fg_sqawk.xml? I
* Holger Wirtz -- Thursday 26 October 2006 16:36:
And the last question: How can I set a value _if_ I get a bi-directional
connection? Simply
/my/path/to/the/property = whatever
Just type helpCR in the telnet session. It will tell you
all you need:
set /my/path/to/the/property whatever
Im have problems updating my Windows 2000
machine
to run newer FlightGear updates! Here's what happens
hope I got it organised enough !!!
After this version "fgfs-win32-20060429" the
Autopilot ADD WAYPOINT
Quoting Curtis Olson :
On 10/26/06, Forums Virgin Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im have problems updating my Windows 2000 machine
to run newer FlightGear updates! Here's what happens
hope I got it organised enough !!!
Make sure you also update to a matching copy of the base package
On 10/25/06, Jeff McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curt, what is your process for going from this flight data to a JSBSimmodel? What sort of maneuvers do you fly and how to get extract theFDM parameters?Jeff,Now you are asking hard questions. I'm not an aerospace engineer so I am trying to learn
This is light patch for devel branch of fgfs.
--
Wbr, Yurik
light_source_devel.tar.gz
Description: application/tgz
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with
Hi,
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 16:48, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I am eager to see it in CVS. It seems natural that the flow of innovation
goes to HEAD and branches are used for freezing functionalities and doing
maintenance release. Many big projects are doing like that, gcc for
instance.
Ok.
In summary I will create a branch this weekend in SimGears and FlightGears
CVS.
That branch will contain the old plib based code. Whoever needs to work on
that/stick with that - not recommended plib/ssg is deprecated now - can live
on that branch.
Past that branch I will push into CVS
Hi,
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 00:55, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
The current 3D clouds don't work on every machine, and I think its
maintainer is gone as well. In my opinion, if 3D clouds is offered in OSG,
then we should make use of it, because it probably is more robust and
better
Hi,
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 00:34, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
Sounds like a significant improvement. Presumably you haven't noticed any
degradation in performance anywhere?
I have no specific test set that I compare - but what I compared is not
slower.
Going on the assumption that this is
17 matches
Mail list logo
