Hi All,
I hope this gets to the correct place and I am very sorry if it does not.
It was recently bought to my attention that there appears to be an issue
with a website I have recently created. www.flight-aviator.com
This website uses the source code from the flight gear project and se
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..excellent, then you would be in an excellent position to verify
> there indeed _is_ a house [...] I found none and said so.
>
Err, you can see it yourself, at least the roof... if you look on Google
maps, click Map view, type in the address. It will show you the house
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:16:25 -0500, Matthew wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Okay.
>
> So, let's look at what actions should be taken. Given that I am not a
> copyright owner, I have nothing at stake beyond community membership.
..me neither. ;o)
..but the copyright owners here and at
James Sleeman wrote:
> I have now sent an email to Mr Casey inviting him to present his side
> of the story here on the developers list and offering my personal
>
Mr Casey has already quickly replied to my email and indicates he will
take a look at this thread. He indicates he is following the
James Sleeman wrote:
> Matthew Tippett wrote:
>
>> So, let's look at what actions should be taken. Given that I am not a
>> copyright owner, I have nothing at stake beyond community membership.
>>
> I think everybody is jumping to conclusions without any actual
> information, we need to f
Matthew Tippett wrote:
> So, let's look at what actions should be taken. Given that I am not a
> copyright owner, I have nothing at stake beyond community membership.
I think everybody is jumping to conclusions without any actual
information, we need to first hear from Mr Casey.
I have now sent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
If we add a little lable / watermark on all screenshots on the homepage
with "http://www.flightgear.org/"; (or one of our logos...) it makes
reusing them much more difficult... Perhaps adding a copyright statement
as well would be even better.
This
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:24 AM, James A. Treacy wrote:
> It is not clear to me that age is the best metric to use in all cases.
> The tile that is the farthest from your current location would also be
> a good candidate for removal.
>
> Since the current algorithm works in most cases, a less int
It is not clear to me that age is the best metric to use in all cases.
The tile that is the farthest from your current location would also be
a good candidate for removal.
Since the current algorithm works in most cases, a less intrusive
solution than messsing with how/when timestamps are applied
On vendredi 21 novembre 2008, Tim Moore wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > Hello Tim
> > There won't be any problem, but i heard that a more recent not stable OSG
> > version was necessary.
> > If it is the case that is the problem.
>
> I've just checked in simgear and flightgear changes that should
I was working with a simulator that uses FlightGear's network master/slave
capability to drive 4 additional displays and discovered an obscure tile
loading / tile caching / cache management bug. I believe I have tracked
down exactly what and why this is happening, and I have a proposed fix that
I'
On Friday 21 November 2008 14:16:25 Matthew Tippett wrote:
> Regarding the images. We now sufficient information for individuals to
> assert their copyright on the individual using them.
Just for the record, I did that earlier today for my own screenshots used. I
gave permission to use my image
gerard robin wrote:
> On vendredi 21 novembre 2008, Tim Moore wrote:
>> Csaba Halász wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:00 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...
>>
Could not find at least one of the following objects for animation:
I guess that is due to the recent up
"Csaba Hal??sz" wrote:
> Okay, I know I am kind of late with this, but I just found out that
> debian stable comes with 1.33.
I just tried out wether this would work with the Debian-shipped Boost
header if we simply corrupt the version number check, but apparently
Tim's rework of the OSG viewer i
Okay.
So, let's look at what actions should be taken. Given that I am not a
copyright owner, I have nothing at stake beyond community membership.
Regarding the images. We now sufficient information for individuals to
assert their copyright on the individual using them.
Regarding flightgear, I a
- "gerard robin" a écrit :
> There won't be any problem, but i heard that a more recent not stable
> OSG
> version was necessary.
> If it is the case that is the problem.
>
> Until we don't have the next OSG stable version.
> Do i have to freeze every model development ?
>
> Or is it really
On vendredi 21 novembre 2008, Tim Moore wrote:
> Csaba Halász wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:00 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> Could not find at least one of the following objects for animation:
> >>
> >> I guess that is due to the recent update of FG CVS with Nas
Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:00 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> Could not find at least one of the following objects for animation:
>>
>> I guess that is due to the recent update of FG CVS with Nasal ? which
>> unfortunately include Boost ( and not useful for
Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>From Mac OS side, there seems no problem in using headers of any
> version of Boost as long as FlightGear works fine. I'll just grab it
> and build FG with boost headers. No difficulties. However, if we're
> going to use boost libraries before the next official
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:00 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nasal runtime error: No such member: initNode
> at /usr/local/share/FlightGear/data/Aircraft/f-14b/Nasal/fuel-system.nas,
> line 147
> called
> from: /usr/local/share/FlightGear/data/Aircraft/f-14b/Nasal/instruments.nas,
Hello,
I would like to get profit of the last models updated.
now i get for instance with F-14 the following message:
Nasal runtime error: No such member: initNode
at /usr/local/share/FlightGear/data/Aircraft/f-14b/Nasal/fuel-system.nas,
line 147
called
from: /usr/local/share/FlightGear/da
Am Mittwoch, den 19.11.2008, 14:40 +0100 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
> The model manager allows to add models at runtime. Most often
> they are static (-> geo.put_model()), but one can also
> register them with adjustable position/orientation properties.
>
> If the object was moving (independently or
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..ok, this far I have found a fake physical address, suggesting my
> suspicion is confirmable. So I cc.
>
> ..unless New Zealand allow a fake address, a fake company, a fake
> name etc, these are illegally registred web sites.
>
Are we taking about whois data Arnt? The w
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:25:22 -0500, Matthew wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Comments within. (I am personally uncomfortable including the GPL
> violations people until we have a clear direction from the leadership
> of the flightgear project as to the direction the project would like
> t
24 matches
Mail list logo
