Re: [Flightgear-devel] p51d-jsbsim merge request

2010-12-27 Thread Vivian Meazza
Hal wrote ... snip I have the merge request in. Done - seems to fix the problem. That really ugly chap is still there though :-). Vivian -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node

Re: [Flightgear-devel] p51d-jsbsim merge request

2010-12-27 Thread Gijs de Rooy
I took a closer look and it appears that I missed the Aircraft/p51d/Models/induction-air-hotspots.xml file when I was checking in my changes. I have checked this into my fgdata clone and I will be requesting a merge into fgdata to get it into place shortly. Not sure how I missed it.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] p51d-jsbsim merge request

2010-12-27 Thread Jon S. Berndt
From: Hal V. Engel [mailto:hven...@gmail.com] snip Property /engines/engine[0]/mp-inhg is already defined. Property /engines/engine/oil-temperature-degf is already defined. Property /controls/fuel/tank-selector is already defined. Property

[Flightgear-devel] Hudson down?

2010-12-27 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Hi, it looks like the Hudson build server is down since last Saterday (or Friday). Any idea about the problem? Is it being worked on? I am completely dependant on this server, since Fred does not provide new binaries any longer, so I'd like to see it up again... ;) Cheers, Gijs

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Hudson down?

2010-12-27 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi,  Is it being worked on? I am completely dependant on this server, since Fred does not provide new binaries any longer, so I'd like to see it up again... ;)  Not only you. It is a bad time right now before the release, testing without the daily Hudson builds is impossible. Heiko

[Flightgear-devel] windsock_lit

2010-12-27 Thread James Turner
I've been seeing (many) these for a while now: Failed to load model: Failed to load 3D model: from:/Users/Shared/FGFS/Scenery-TerraSync/Models/Airport/windsock_lit.xml The xml file exists, but references: pathwindsock_lit.ac/path which does not exist, that I can see. Is this a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] windsock_lit

2010-12-27 Thread Curtis Olson
Looks like it should be there: http://gitorious.org/fg/fgdata/blobs/master/Models/Airport/windsock_lit.ac The file exists in my local tree here. Curt. On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:07 AM, James Turner wrote: I've been seeing (many) these for a while now: Failed to load model: Failed to load

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Hudson down?

2010-12-27 Thread Gene Buckle
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Gijs de Rooy wrote: Hi, it looks like the Hudson build server is down since last Saterday (or Friday). Any idea about the problem? Is it being worked on? I am completely dependant on this server, since Fred does not provide new binaries any longer, so I'd like to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] windsock_lit

2010-12-27 Thread Martin Spott
James Turner wrote: Failed to load model: Failed to load 3D model: from:/Users/Shared/FGFS/Scenery-TerraSync/Models/Airport/windsock_lit.xml The reference would be the TerraSync SVN-repository - which actually has the file:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] windsock_lit

2010-12-27 Thread Martin Spott
Martin Spott wrote: The reference would be the TerraSync SVN-repository - which actually has the file: http://terrascenery.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/data/Scenery/Models/Airport/windsock_lit.xml I mean:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] windsock_lit

2010-12-27 Thread James Turner
On 27 Dec 2010, at 17:08, Martin Spott wrote: When I'm copying the path reference from the XML file into the SVN-URL, then I'm properly getting the corresponding AC3D file. Therefore I _suspect_ the repository is consistent - at least regarding this model ;-) This was a local problem, I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Minor menu renaming

2010-12-27 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Stuart Buchanan wrote: On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Gijs de Rooy wrote: Looks good to me Stuart! But I do wonder why people feel the need to capitilise each single word. Why isn't it Traffic options, or Tanker controls? I know it's not a big deal, but to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Minor menu renaming

2010-12-27 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Hi Stuart wrote: - a close button on the top right - at minimum a Close button at the bottom of the dialog (Why) do we need two buttons to close a dialog? I recently removed the ones that say Close on most dialogs, replacing them with small buttons in the top right corner. There are

[Flightgear-devel] Re-enabling ATCDCL

2010-12-27 Thread Dave L
Hi List, For some time now we've had 2 attempts at interactive ATC/AI in the code, my old one (ATCDCL) and Durk's new one (ATC). ATCDCL is disabled by default at compile time. I've now ripped out all the old interactive ATC and AI from ATCDCL. This just leaves ATIS, AWOS, the nearby ATC

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Minor menu renaming

2010-12-27 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Gijs de Rooy wrote: (Why) do we need two buttons to close a dialog? I recently removed the ones that say Close on most dialogs, replacing them with small buttons in the top right corner. There are quite some dialogs that don't have a normal close button (like

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re-enabling ATCDCL

2010-12-27 Thread John Denker
On 12/27/2010 03:59 PM, Dave L wrote: The ATIS/AWOS and nearby ATC frequency dialog are all useful, Yes! and would be a major regression if not working for the release. Yes indeed! I can't see any downside to removing the conditional compilation completely now, but I'll leave it 24