Le 23/11/2012 20:03, Renk Thorsten a écrit :
I guess I need some help here... I've finally managed to compile FG
on the new computer, then copy my FGData here, and... it works. But
the framerate is abysmally bad.
Hi Thorsten,
Just to say that if you have a serious cloud coverage (with or
Le 23/11/2012 22:54, Alexis Bory a écrit :
Here, core i7-3Ghz-16 MB RAM, GTX 680-2MB VRAM, 1920*1200px,
BTW:
- Linux 3.2.0-33 64 bits
- NVidia driver: 304.64
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure
Hi,
While trying to help an user on the forum I just tried to downlod a .tgz
snapshot of the f-14b from mapserver.
The path inside the archive were fgdata/content-of-the-aircraft-folder
instead of the expected
fgdata/Aircraft/f-14b/content-of-the-aircraft-folder.
I don't know if it's a bug
Le 07/11/2012 10:55, Renk Thorsten a écrit :
Sorry, I don't want to talk down on the great job you guys are doing
in presenting all this, I'm just trying to understand what it is you
consider an eye-catcher. I'm just a bit mystified that somehow a
feature which dominated our screenshot
Hi all,
The purpose of this little cosmetic patch is to ease the use of
proptest's output in a ploter.
Thanks to review,
Alexis
diff --git a/src/FDM/YASim/proptest.cpp b/src/FDM/YASim/proptest.cpp
index 9bdadef..cc4ffc4 100644
--- a/src/FDM/YASim/proptest.cpp
+++
Le 07/10/2012 00:13, Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Alexis Bory wrote:
The idea is NOT to change anything to this standard. Instead, I've
just added a tiny option in the Display Options dialog
On balance, I think this new options probably sits best under
HI,
I just posted on the forum about YASim and I thought it was a good idea
to post here as well:
Talking about us (FG's aircraft modelers and developers) and YASim:
YASim is a very cool tool, I like it very much, but it comes with its
crwod of frustrations you have to live with. And the
Hi all
The default Field of View has been choosen a long time ago and discussed
several times on the devel list.
AFAIK this 55 deg FOV had been settled for two main reasons:
1) There is a need to have a standard FOV across different aircrafts so
the user keeps its space and distance
Le 22/07/2012 14:58, Mathias Fröhlich a écrit :
The mentioned commit breaks scenegraph picking. For reference take
the c172 door handle that opens the dor but never closes it anymore.
Well, except you click at the position where the untransformed door
handle would be.
Quite annoying when
Le 04/07/2012 14:27, Erik Hofman a écrit :
On 07/04/2012 01:12 PM, Michael wrote:
No, I mean authors could leave as is or use any licence they want.
-- But it doesn't need to be GPL. --
Sorry, GPL is ok for code but feels like a lead-foot for everything else.The
The only option would be
Hi all,
I just filed a nasty little bug here:
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=797
I'm not sure if it's directly related to Rembrandt or it is a long
standing bug with effect/inherits-from Effects/model-transparent,
but it brakes the A-6E ADI (Attitude Indicator) and in
Le 03/07/2012 22:25, Alexis Bory a écrit :
Hi all,
I just filed a nasty little bug here:
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=797
I'm not sure if it's directly related to Rembrandt or it is a long
standing bug with effect/inherits-from Effects/model-transparent
Le 19/06/2012 11:49, Vic Marriott a écrit :
Hi All,
I received this today. It is a commercial venture, so I don't feel
inclined to contribute directly. Has anyone else been contacted by them?
Yes, I think so. I've been contacted privately around October 2010 by
Steve (Swanbast ?) who was
Le 08/06/2012 20:39, Torsten Dreyer a écrit :
Thanks for all the replies,
summing all up, I end up with the following:
The summer release will become v2.8.0. Rembrandt is included but
disabled by default and announced as an experimental but cool new feature.
We keep the current selection
Le 07/06/2012 18:04, Gijs de Rooy a écrit :
There's a lot possible with Rembrandt, but 99% of our aircraft don't
use it. And lots of aircraft look ugly with Rembrandt
(non-translucent windows and fake shadows mostly). I just checked the
few aircraft that I remember being included in the base
Le 06/03/2012 00:05, Ron Jensen a écrit :
Personally, I hate the glass shaders covering instruments and windows.
I want
to actually fly these aircraft and not drool over how 'real' they look.
Flying means I need to be able to actually read the instrument, so I often
prefer larger fonts and
Le 23/02/2012 23:21, Martin Spott a écrit :
when I
can spend all the time on so many other enjoyable activities.
Have fun,
Martin.
Martin, I quote only this one, as I do know what can be felt in such
circumstances, and you're right, the most important: save time to enjoy
life.
Le 12/02/2012 11:00, Erik Hofman a écrit :
That said, it's sad to see the situation end up like this. I always
found it quite pleasing to work with others that updated my model byt
frankly I would get mad when at one point they would claim ownership
like you do.
I second Erik on that one. I
Le 26/11/2011 22:27, Alasdair Campbell a écrit :
I recommend the cheaper, but wonderful blend of malts
known as The Famous Grouse
+1 :-)
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a
Le 12/11/2011 11:05, Frederic Bouvier a écrit :
See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png
And what about this one ?
http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png
-Fred
Hi Fred,
Stars are funnier, but from my point of view, the size of the rating
Le 30/10/2011 11:38, ThorstenB a écrit :
On 30.10.2011 11:02, Durk Talsma wrote:
I managed to narrow the problem down to a commit that occurred
between October 12 and October 16. More specifically,
FlightGear next: 3d544fb SimGear next: e4e31be
still works, while
FlightGear next : 0f5d27c
Le 30/10/2011 20:50, ThorstenB a écrit :
Am 30.10.2011 20:42, schrieb Citronnier - Alexis Bory:
Mmh not sure if its related or if I did something silly but flightgear
didn't make it...
with this output:
Ah, my stupid mistake. Pull again (flightgear).
Cool, it made it this time, thanks
Hi all and Curt,
mpserver10 is moving, the old server is still running but it's going to
be removed from the racks on Thursday (maybe). fgms is already running
on a brand new and powerful VM.
The new IP is: 31.24.249.125
Thanks a lot for updating the DNS record,
Alexis
Le 25/09/2011 01:07, Geoff McLane a écrit :
Evolved from [Any alpha testers with a bit of extra time on their
hands?]
Re: Start up
When I first loaded the f-14b the engines were NOT
running, so I searched for a 'Start-up procedure', but
mostly in vane... it turned out all I needed to do
Le 23/09/2011 16:47, Curtis Olson a écrit :
Hi Geoff,
I'm starting to run low on ideas here. I assume you don't have any
crazy/severe turbulence turned on or your plots would be all over the
place. Are you running out of fuel and your engines dying? If you
open the autopilot dialog
Le 22/09/2011 05:03, Curtis Olson a écrit :
I have something here that I think is kind of fun.
Yup, I confirm this is plenty fun :-)
It worked like a charm here. However with local weather, cold front,
rough day condition, the challenge is there. Due to heavy turbs the
system entered huge
encounter problems.
Greetings,
Alexis
Maybe see a few of you out there?
Curt.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Citronnier - Alexis Bory wrote:
Le 23/09/2011 16:47, Curtis Olson a écrit :
Hi Geoff,
I'm starting to run low on ideas here. I assume you don't have any
Le 22/09/2011 22:04, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:00:49 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
CAHtsj_crOGWDX43J5oKw7F6g12AWsRePoceNGW=a1b0txod...@mail.gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Geoff McLane wrote:
You seem to be deliberately holding its speed down
around 150 - I
Le 17/09/2011 20:26, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
Cedric wrote
I hope this is the last time we will have to discuss this topic, since
over the last months it seemed that everyone agreed with that FGDATA
- has to be split sometime
- should be split a.s.a.p.
We agreed that after the current
Le 12/09/2011 21:31, Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
2011/9/12 Mathias Fröhlich :
On Sunday, September 11, 2011 21:29:28 Durk Talsma wrote:
My error was in SimGear, and your fix was for FlightGear, it I'm correct.
So, I'm not sure if that would fix it.
Hmm, then probably not...
... but I have done
Le 28/08/2011 16:43, Paul Guhl a écrit :
Lets clarify the issues: the modellers asked me to provide secured file
format to prevent model theft and resell for benefit. They are willing
to contribute to FG and don't plan to sell add-ons. Instead they would
like to see their copyright enforced
Le 27/07/2011 12:48, Slavutinsky Victor a écrit :
I'm afraid that you wrongly interpret 'being busy doing other things'
with 'unwilling to help'. So far everybody who has made valuable
contributions has been welcomed by everybody. And depending on the time
someone has/is willing to reserver
Le 26/07/2011 22:45, Durk Talsma a écrit :
Hi Torsten,
On 26 Jul 2011, at 22:34, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Am 26.07.2011 22:26, schrieb Durk Talsma:
Hi Torsten,
Thanks for the report. I can confirm the crash, which means that I'm
optimistic that I find a solution tomorrow. I've just seen a
Le 25/07/2011 18:06, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
Martin,
-Original Message- From: Martin Spott
[mailto:martin.sp...@mgras.net] Sent: 25 July 2011 16:14 To:
FlightGear developers discussions Subject: [Flightgear-devel]
Martin is responding slowly
Hi, if anyone is wondering
Le 03/07/2011 11:20, Bruce Hellstrom a écrit :
I have FlightGear 2.0.0 installed and working. However, I need the
latest code to integrate some changes to be submitted later once
everything is tested.
When I build the latest pull from Git (SimGear/FlightGear and using
the latest
Le 12/06/2011 19:39, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
Can we please have the old airport textures back: the new ones wreck
some very fine airports. Here's a small sample of Gatwick/EGKK. It's
like this all over and it's spoiling someone's very good work:
Le 25/05/2011 22:28, Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
This is done. I've gone ahead and replaced the article completely with
the rating system described in December.
Now I'm off to rate all the aircraft I maintain!
-Stuart
Hehe, nice to see that a rating system may have a chance to be established.
Le 13/05/2011 23:42, Martin Spott a écrit :
While I'm at it, I'd like to express a warm thank you to those
private and commercial sponsors who actually made this particular
booth setup possible ...
Hi Martin,
Wow this booth is really outstanding! It couldn't look more professional.
Now
Heiko Schulz a écrit :
Hi,
I could imagine more something like a portal, (like avsim.com,
x-plane.org) where you have all Downloads available, sorted in
licencs, types, ratings. This would allow to search and find easily
all aircraft, no need to search through the whole web.
It would
syd adams a écrit :
Just a thought , but maybe asking nicely rather than demands and
threats might work better ;)
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jack Mermod jackmer...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm planning on contacting Red Bull today. If I get the green light, I
better see my livery in the
Gene Buckle a écrit :
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Just a thought , but maybe asking nicely rather than demands and
threats might work better ;)
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jack Mermod jackmer...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm planning on contacting Red Bull
Hi all,
I just hover above a bunch of discussions about how to complete a not so
complex L/G animation.
Well, I have done some nice landing gear, see A-10, A-6E, f14b. I didn't
use any maths for that. No nasal, no perl, no python... No maths
function from the FDM either. The XML interpolation
James Turner a écrit :
On 2 Jan 2011, at 14:56, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
gui.menuEnable(fuel-and-payload, false);
We can add new names for any other menus that we might want to
disable on a per-aircraft basis, but from a quick skim through the
menus I couldn't see any other candidates.
f-14b updated and in git, so it uses symbolic name rather than labels.
Alexis
--
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database
James Turner a écrit :
On 30 Dec 2010, at 18:18, ThorstenB wrote:
So, what do we do? Adapt all the aircraft above - or revert the menu
item ordering?
Adapt the ordering in the short term, and then come up with a non-brittle
solution for the future.
The new menu arrangement is
Hi all
I did (mid october) a flightgear page on Productwiki site.
Product wiki is an intersting site where you can describe and rewiew any
product on a wiki basis. So feel free to improve the page and add review.
Since the creation, additional links appeared on the Product manuals
(click see
Peter Brown a écrit :
Based on what I saw when following the link, I might suggest that
it's not a good way to promote FlightGear, since it's not for sale.
There are an Amazon and Ebay link on the site main stage as someplace
to buy FlightGear, which purely takes the potential user away
Jack Mermod a écrit :
Screenshot: http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/5017/cobra5.png
Hi Jack,
At first glance I see a problem (very common) with the colors of the 3D
model. Dark parts (that is not on the sun side) a really too dark.
The reason is that ambient values are not equals to rgb
2010/12/11 Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net
If people
are serious about their stuff, then they'll have to learn to commit
their stuff early _without_ being faced with some release deadline.
If they don't, their problem - next time, after the release passed
without their contribution
Vivian Meazza a écrit :
Torsten wrote
It looks like there are only 2 or 3 different ads, but it took
clicking
on
at least 14-16 of them before they stopped appearing on my fb
page -
nice,
those behind FSP are uploading the same ads over and over, and
calling them new ones each
Csaba Halász a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Robin van Steenbergen
stone...@stoneynet.nl wrote:
I am not sure whether the content *generated* by a GPL-licensed
program (such as FlightGear generating screenshots) would have to
be licensed under the GPL as well.
To be
Jack Mermod a écrit :
Hi, I've been trying to get the F-18 model off of the Vinson, but
this has proved difficult in Blender. Can anybody with AC3D pull the
FA-18 model off of the vinson.ac, and post it here? That would really
help. When I pull it off in blender, it doesn't keep the
Mathias Fröhlich a écrit :
Hi,
On Thursday, October 21, 2010 03:40:42 Jack Mermod wrote:
I've been doing some heavy work on Mathias Frohlich's F/A-18
lately, but I have been forced to postpone my release of the
improved version due to the fact that I cannot find any indication
of what
Citronnier - Alexis Bory a écrit :
In http://www.maison-capestang.com/fg/ there are also some other free
models, all by flyingtoaster, and all released under GPL.
well, actually flyingtoaster's models are precisely in
http://www.maison-capestang.com/fg/flyingtoaster/ :-)
Alexis
Csaba Halász a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Curtis Olson curtol...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Csaba (or anyone else), I'm just bumping this back up to the top
of everyone's inbox in hopes that someone will respond and let me
know what specific dns changes should be made. This is
syd adams a écrit :
Hi folks, I recompiled flightgear (git) , and noticed that the 2d
cloud layers are racing along nearly double my flight speed , and
usually in the general heading I fly .Its gives the illusion I'm
flying backwards , unless a mountain peak happens to be poking
Stuart Buchanan a écrit :
In an effort to help with this I've been looking at two fixes: 1) A
control to disable sub-model loading for AI aircraft. This
effectively stops the model loader from recursing into model tags,
and therefore stops it from loading any sub-models such as cockpits,
Curtis Olson a écrit :
I just updated the aircraft download page with all the latest
aircraft updates to match FlightGear v2.0
http://www.flightgear.org/Downloads/aircraft-2.0.0/
I notice that many of the new aircraft are missing thumbnails, and
perhaps a few of the older aircraft could
Hi,
I noticed that FG's particles contrails never reflect the coloured light
of the sun. At sunset time, they should have the same redish color as
the clouds, instead they looks like black smoke or enlightened white smoke.
a) This above is with this setting:
emissive type=boolfalse/emissive
Martin Spott a e'crit :
Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
KLSV 012X is one of these. Last updates forgot this one we added to
our nav.dat long time ago. Robin should have it in his papers but,
well it's gone.
a) Please bring it back !!!
Have a patch handy ?
Cheers, Martin.
Yes, see attached
Hi all and Martin,
Some freqs are not handled by X-Plane but are supported in FG. AFAIK
this is because we use a workaround to make VORs compatible with TACAN
on certain weird frequencies.
KLSV 012X is one of these. Last updates forgot this one we added to our
nav.dat long time ago. Robin
Yes he dares !
http://flightprosim.com/screenshots/SNAG-0281.jpg
Alexis
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A
Hi all,
Reproductible while using --atlas argument, you need to try hard to
crash the c172p. After a few (serious) crash maneuvers it triggers a
buffer overflow.
Alexis
--
NAN's found in SampleGroup velocity
PT_vs_hpt: ran out of layers
Warning: invalid line segment passed to
Torsten Dreyer a écrit :
No transponder correct, an IFR certified aircraft without a
transponder is unrealistic. It's low priority on my todo list and I
consider it a missing feature, not a bug. My goal is to model a
GTX330 which is what I have in the RL Seneca. As a side note: I
Hi all,
There is a new mpserver, mpserver10.flightgear.org.
This one is located in France - Montpellier 34.
Thanks to all mpserver-maintainers for replaying to it.
Alexis
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R)
Hi all,
I think all of these discussions drive us in the wrong way. Even if we
would have a different license, there would be a lot of people trying to
profit from our work by trying to copy it. That's only because our work
is good. And this work is good also because it has been done under
leee a écrit :
[...]
If individuals want to spend their time bounty-hunting (although
there's no ca$h bounty, of course) then they're welcome to do so, but
this should not be a concern of the FG project. The only time that
this issue should concern the FG project is when someone tries
Pete Morgan a écrit :
Glad you picked the 787, this is broken in CVS with all sorts of
errors.. thats why We need an aircraft fault list...
Hi Pete, there is also the wiki for that, look here:
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Category:Aircraft_TODO
and here you can start a list of
Hi Manuel,
As Martin just shortly said, you shouldn't add dependencies on stuff
that is not certainly part of the base package. This means depending
only on *basic and generic stuff*. Even an existing aircraft from the
base package may be pushed out of the short list at the next release
(that
Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
Hi Manuel,
As Martin just shortly said, you shouldn't add dependencies on stuff
that is not certainly part of the base package. This means depending
only on *basic and generic stuff*. Even an existing aircraft from
the base package may be pushed out
Martin Spott wrote:
Hi Alexis, Manuel,
Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
Also please, would you mind choose and formalize a specific name to
the JSBsim Tomcat? I already proposed to you
$FG_ROOT/Aircraft/f-14b-jsbsim/f-14b-jsbsim-set.xml, but now, it is
up to you to decide and fix
Manuel Bynum wrote:
Well, I can remove the bombs. that's what's requiring the davepack.
and also requiring it are the vortices. I'll ask DCulp and see if
he'd let me include his pack with my F-14.
Manuel, what about subscribing to the devel list (and CVS-logs) ? Maybe
with a dedicated
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Alexis Bory -- Monday 04 May 2009:
Added Files: pushback.nas
This is not only verbose and ugly code, it will cause error messages
and not work on some machines. Just saying ...
m. :-}
Hi Melchior,
I did not had such a strong feeling when receiving Gijs code
Heiko Schulz wrote:
May I ask something here? Why there is something comitted, which
isn't tested yet?
But commiting to the CVS is the faster way to get usefull feed back and
gather differents opinions on a proposal.
A generic pushback sounds nice, but so much as I
understood, the
Alexis Bory wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Nasal In directory
baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9196
Modified Files: pushback.nas Log Message: - Now the pushback door
will be created only if /sim/model/pushback has already been created
by the modeler via the aircraft
gerard robin wrote:
Hello, Only a question , to avoid , to die idiot. When i am flying
with MP with any Aircraft but a f-14 and when a f-14 is flown by an
other pilot , i get within the internal property a folder /f-14/
with several item which seem unuseful (since empty).
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Durk Talsma -- Sunday 22 March 2009:
FWIW, I just checked in a small change that allows the AI Air
Traffic controller to request the AI Aircraft to set a squawk code.
Yeah, I've read that, and we've immediately discussed on IRC how to
use that. Unfortunately,
Detlef Faber wrote:
Maybe there hasn't been a lot of praise for nasal, but I guess the
broad use of nasal, even among JSBSim developers speaks for itself.
As far as I know there hasn't been any comments of lacking nasal
features (that weren't added within a short time).
Finally: I
gerard robin wrote:
I was STUPID since, i thought that the modelers were free to create
the Aircraft in order to answer to these old criteria ( best FDM, eye
candy). I noticed now that we are dependent of some constraints, we
must accept anything coming from the mind of DEVELOPPER who
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Ever since helicopter support was added to the YASim FDM there's an
annoying bug: even when parked, with rotor off and braked,
helicopters slide happily around on the ground.
Andy knows about it and explained why it happens, but claims that
there's nothing to be
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I'm seeing segfaults from time to time with Windows and CVS/Head
trying to start when mp is running. Csaba Halász reports the same.
It's most frustrating to try to track this one down, because it is
not reliably repeatable. Assuming that we are not the only ones
Hi all,
I just thought that displaying Flightgear and the aircraft version
numbers on the splash screen could help a bit the supporting effort we
do on the forum and the users list.
Thinking out loud,
Alexis
--
Rob Shearman, Jr. wrote:
!-- DIV {margin:0px;} -- Okay -- I just finished updating with
Fred's new binary and CVS update, and duplicated the flight, and it
happened again. Weird thing is, I was JUST climbing through about
17,000 when I was thinking, gee, this is going well so far. I
James Turner wrote:
I'm planning to create some slightly advanced cockpit instruments in
the near future, and to do this I need to support some more complex
text displays. (This is for the character-based displays on the
KLN89/94/etc GPSs, and FMS/MCDU units in the longer term).
I was
Curtis Olson wrote:
These aircraft download packages as well as the download page is all
autogenerated from scripts, and all the information about authors and
versions is contained within your aircraft. If you have any
questions, look at an example aircraft that does things the way you
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
var MPS_TO_KT = MPS2KT;
What do other Nasal developers think? I'm willing to change it if
others have problems with that, too. (And to change all occurrences
in the repository.)
No problem here with shorter names for the constants. For me they are
easy to
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
Well, This time I really think I should make my works commercial- or
if you want to have all this give ma a lot of money.
I'm aware that we want to make it right, like our overall concept on
flightgear.org says. But this is also dependant of time and (!)
Hi all,
I have a problem with how the f-14b liveries textures are applied over MP:
I can switch livery locally without problem, there is 4 PNGs for each
livery and every thing goes fine.
The livery change over MP is also visible, all properties under
ai/model/multiplayer/sim/model/livery (and
Csaba Halász wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Alexis Bory - xiii
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with how the f-14b liveries textures are applied
over MP:
Seem to be the same issue as with the dr400, but this time with the
material animation.
I applied
Heiko Schulz wrote:
c17p : Light Single GA; our default aircraft - overall
size can possibly be reduced by removing some liveries
O.k.- and where to store the liveries which didn't get into the base
package? There was a lot of work- it shoulden't be lost.
Hi all, I have the same
Yon Uriarte wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Stuart Buchanan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I note that the base package size above is 200MB.
We can reduce the on-disk plane footprint.
I did a quick test compressing f-14b/Models/common2.rgb (texture
Markus Zojer wrote:
2.)Using the YASim FDM, the prop consumables/fuel/total-fuel-lbs and
total-fuel-gals show about twice the fuel you have onboard.
If it happens on an air to air refueling aircraft you might check how
aar.nas is declared in the -set.xml file.
The A-6E had the same symptom
2008/11/1 gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks , here, it will be the opportunity to test it.
Raining and raining and raining beuh.:(
Well, it's actually raining and raining here in SF :/
Alexis, (who is spending its vacations under the west coast rain...)
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Hi people,
Be advised that the texture repeat parsing of the osg ac3d loader
plugin changed on 3rd of october. This means, textures without a
texrep value will not repeat any more. This might affect texture
animations, such as in the case of kx165 (patch
$ grep launch src/MultiPlayer/multiplaymgr.cxx {107,
gear/launchbar/position-norm, SGPropertyNode::FLOAT}, {108,
gear/launchbar/state, SGPropertyNode::STRING}, {109,
gear/launchbar/holdback-position-norm, SGPropertyNode::FLOAT},
That should have been we. I've no idea how it got into
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Added:
+ {111, surface-positions/wing-pos-norm,
SGPropertyNode::FLOAT}, + {112,
surface-positions/wing-fold-pos-norm, SGPropertyNode::FLOAT},
wing(s)-pos-norm is apparently not used anywhere yet, but
wing-fold-pos-norm is:
$ lsprop|grep wing-fold-pos-norm
Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Added:
+ {111, surface-positions/wing-pos-norm, SGPropertyNode::FLOAT},
+ {112, surface-positions/wing-fold-pos-norm,
SGPropertyNode::FLOAT},
wing(s)-pos-norm is apparently not used anywhere yet, but
wing-fold-pos-norm
Manfred Janßen wrote:
1. I try to add some radar coverage cone to the A-10. But at the
moment I have no idea, how to start that. Any hints?
Hi Manfred,
What do you mean by radar coverage ? The A-10 do not have a radar, or
may be you are talking about Radar Warning Receiver ?
There is no
Ummon Karpe wrote:
Wow. I didn't know that radar was implemented in Flightgear. I would
like to add it to all the Fighter Jets. Are there any instructions?
Hi Ummon,
Not yet but I'm working on instruction for radar2.nas.
Note there is two main systems now, radar2.nas may look nicer at the
Manfred Janßen wrote:
Hi Alexis,
it's not bounded to the A-10. The only think I wanna show is the
coverage of the radar of the aircraft, let me show you a simple
drawing:
Ok with the image that you sent me off list I understand.
You can add a visible shape in place of what could be the
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
