On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:04:02 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
CAHtsj_fM87grwpzG-vYmANWnALfojsGhOA=dWGajb4gSj2=w...@mail.gmail.com:
Updated to Beta02 -- with hopefully a bit better view management and
some more small gain tweaks (probably nothing anyone will notice.)
..tried to set camera target
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net wrote:
..tried to set camera target to some place on-shore with the camera
operator click-to-point-to-orbit, on climb-out this is over-ridden
to Carrier,
Hi Arnt,
There is some logic going on there to try to automatically guess what
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 15:53:26 Curtis Olson wrote:
a heavier than air balloon ...
Would that be a Led Zeppelin?
:)
Ron
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Ron Jensen wrote:
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 15:53:26 Curtis Olson wrote:
a heavier than air balloon ...
Would that be a Led Zeppelin?
That's more clever than what I was thinking. :-)
Open-humor.
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson:
http://www.atiak.com -
Hi Curt,
Ok, version 04 zip nailed it exactly ;=
Now it circles PERFECTLY... I can see in Atlas
that each circle exactly overlays the last...
I have not yet tried adding TURBULENCE and WINDS
but will...
Holding exactly 150@2000, the HUD bank-o-meter
seldom gets beyond the 3rd marking -
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:10:29 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
CAHtsj_f6u5=_2hgcxdtxho1tvtiup+gex-bphtpciafjy0f...@mail.gmail.com:
Hi Geoff (and Arnt, et. al.)
I have another update to try. This one drives the roll angle by
manipulating the ailerons directly, rather than trying to modify
Here's one for your guys. Do any nasal errors pop up on the console when
things go bad? Are you able to manually fly the f-14b (non-uas version)
around just fine?
Once in maybe 20-50 flights I do see something go goofy with the f-14b
stability augmentation's roll control. Maybe this same issue
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:54:05 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
20110924125405.072bc...@nb6.lan:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:06:00 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
CAHtsj_c=qrUGW4=F9PfEMoDGfgdC2yZVK77pp3gE3P=tbjr...@mail.gmail.com:
Here's one for your guys. Do any nasal errors pop up on the console
Not convenient we chose Vinson because the deck is indeed identical to
Nimitz.
Vivian
-Original Message-
From: Curtis Olson [mailto:curtol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 September 2011 23:21
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Any alpha testers with a
Hi Curt,
Ok, removed my joystick, and entered a '5', but
still crashed while just in 'circle' mode - no route
entered ;=((
As usual Atlas provides a good 'view' as to
what happened - added -
ATLAS=--atlas=socket,out,IP,5500,udp
to output to Atlas running in a 2nd machine...
See -
Hi Geoff,
I'm starting to run low on ideas here. I assume you don't have any
crazy/severe turbulence turned on or your plots would be all over the place.
Are you running out of fuel and your engines dying? If you open the
autopilot dialog (F11) you can see the target speed and if you have the
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:47:35 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
cahtsj_edpuscxjf3m8_fbzzx4+-m8ugdahhcx9nfk+43zwd...@mail.gmail.com:
Hi Geoff,
I'm starting to run low on ideas here. I assume you don't have any
crazy/severe turbulence turned on or your plots would be all over the
place. Are you
Hi Curt,
Using real weather fetch... no particular
turbulence...
Have HUD on, and holding 150, steady... as
indicated in auto-target (F11), and as shown by
the speed (kts) graph...
Not descending, in fact usually still climbing to
target 2000, or holding steady at 2000... as the
Altitude
Le 23/09/2011 16:47, Curtis Olson a écrit :
Hi Geoff,
I'm starting to run low on ideas here. I assume you don't have any
crazy/severe turbulence turned on or your plots would be all over the
place. Are you running out of fuel and your engines dying? If you
open the autopilot dialog
Geoff and Arnt and anyone else who is interested. I just updated the zip
file overlay with a few changes.
Geoff: you may be getting tired of being a bunny, but I played around with
the roll controller and limited max target roll angle to +/-35 degrees. I
also dialed down the gains a bit on final
Le 22/09/2011 05:03, Curtis Olson a écrit :
I have something here that I think is kind of fun.
Yup, I confirm this is plenty fun :-)
It worked like a charm here. However with local weather, cold front,
rough day condition, the challenge is there. Due to heavy turbs the
system entered huge
Le 23/09/2011 23:12, Curtis Olson a écrit :
Geoff and Arnt and anyone else who is interested. I just updated the
zip file overlay with a few changes.
Geoff: you may be getting tired of being a bunny, but I played around
with the roll controller and limited max target roll angle to +/-35
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:44:02 +0200, Citronnier wrote in message
4e7cfda2.7060...@gmail.com:
Le 23/09/2011 23:12, Curtis Olson a écrit :
Geoff and Arnt and anyone else who is interested. I just updated
the zip file overlay with a few changes.
Geoff: you may be getting tired of being a
Hi Curt,
Always a bunny to try NEW things, and eventually
got there ;=))
I think you should for sure say somewhere to
add the option --carrier=Vinson when running
fgfs, either via fgrun, or on the command
line... Of course this is implied, but my first
attempt was without this ;=((
And it
Hi Geoff,
Thanks for checking it out! I was starting to get worried by the complete
silence that no one would try this at all. :-)
I'll tweak the instructions a bit as per your comments. And if you (or
anyone else) has any other points that should be clarified or fixed, just
holler. I will
Hi Curt,
A pleasure, and FUN ;=))
Yes, I know a low frame rate can play havoc when
you are trying to fine control an aircraft from
its attitude feedback, and I should have mentioned my
rate, but is always in the high 50-70 fps range in this
Ubuntu machine... so should NOT be a factor...
I
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:03:43 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
CAHtsj_cKv-ZEsXm-1h_+QVZtRUez6yUBHmLzccs=4jk=myr...@mail.gmail.com:
I have something here that I think is kind of fun. I've been
fiddling with this off and on since last fall and decided it was time
to clean it up a bit and quit
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Geoff McLane wrote:
Hi Curt,
A pleasure, and FUN ;=))
Yes, I know a low frame rate can play havoc when
you are trying to fine control an aircraft from
its attitude feedback, and I should have mentioned my
rate, but is always in the high 50-70 fps range in
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:42:58 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
20110922204258.605fc...@nb6.lan:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:03:43 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
CAHtsj_cKv-ZEsXm-1h_+QVZtRUez6yUBHmLzccs=4jk=myr...@mail.gmail.com:
I have something here that I think is kind of fun. I've been
Arnt, you have hijacked my thread, but if you are at 3fps with v1.9 then I'd
recommend spending $10 on ebay to get yourself a decent video card and maybe
$35 to get yourself a decent computer. :-) :-) :-)
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:00:49 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
CAHtsj_crOGWDX43J5oKw7F6g12AWsRePoceNGW=a1b0txod...@mail.gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Geoff McLane wrote:
You seem to be deliberately holding its speed down
around 150 - I see air-brakes come up when greater
than
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:36:23 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
CAHtsj_dh0m6BJ8k8gOEB0uzC5EpGARUTz=h1dgc5-+1d0z+...@mail.gmail.com:
Arnt, you have hijacked my thread, but if you are at 3fps with v1.9
then I'd recommend spending $10 on ebay to get yourself a decent
video card and maybe $35 to get
Le 22/09/2011 22:04, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:00:49 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
CAHtsj_crOGWDX43J5oKw7F6g12AWsRePoceNGW=a1b0txod...@mail.gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Geoff McLane wrote:
You seem to be deliberately holding its speed down
around 150 - I
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:36:45 +0200, Citronnier wrote in message
4e7b9c5d.6080...@gmail.com:
Le 22/09/2011 22:04, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:00:49 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
CAHtsj_crOGWDX43J5oKw7F6g12AWsRePoceNGW=a1b0txod...@mail.gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at
I went with the Vinson because it is spiffier. Everything should
(theoretically) work the same and just as well from the Nimitz. I believe
the deck geometries are identical in FlightGear (conveniently.) ;-)
Curt.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net wrote:
On Thu, 22
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:20:51 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
cahtsj_cjgngbynczckm2e8fhnct50lmi0yefatxjygtn+_y...@mail.gmail.com:
I went with the Vinson because it is spiffier. Everything should
(theoretically) work the same and just as well from the Nimitz. I
believe the deck geometries are
I have something here that I think is kind of fun. I've been fiddling with
this off and on since last fall and decided it was time to clean it up a bit
and quit hording all the fun for myself. Basically I have taken the F-14b
and created a high performance Navy drone out of it. It can
32 matches
Mail list logo
