On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Stuart
Thanks for addressing the points that were hammered out over on the IRC
channel. I think the modified system could work. Just a few points
remain:
There is no penalty for including systems, such as an AP, where none
existed
On Monday, May 30, 2011 12:47:41 PM Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I don't have a good answer for the other items. Some are nice-to-haves
that enrich
the simulation experience but don't impact simulation of flight
itself, but others
(such as a co-pilot) are more important for multi-crew
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Vivian Meazz awrote:
Thanks for addressing the points that were hammered out over on the IRC
channel. I think the modified system could work. Just a few points remain:
There is no penalty for including systems, such as an AP, where none existed
on the
Stuart
Thanks for addressing the points that were hammered out over on the IRC
channel. I think the modified system could work. Just a few points
remain:
There is no penalty for including systems, such as an AP, where none
existed
on the original.
There's not an explicit penalty.
On Thursday, May 26, 2011 06:31:13 AM Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Vivian Meazz awrote:
Thanks for addressing the points that were hammered out over on the IRC
channel. I think the modified system could work. Just a few points
remain:
There is no penalty for
5 matches
Mail list logo
