Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013): Version 2.10

2012-12-18 Thread James Turner
On 18 Dec 2012, at 11:26, Torsten Dreyer wrote: I'll leave this discussion open until the feature freeze on Dec., 17th to come to a decision by that date. If nobody heavily objects, I'll commit the version number 2.10 later today. Sounds fine to me. James

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013): Version 2.10

2012-12-18 Thread Torsten Dreyer
I have just pushed the new version number 2.10 to simgear, flightgear and fgdata along with the tag version/2.10.0 for all three repos. Make sure you pull all three repositories to avoid a version conflict. After the creation of the release branches on Jan., 17th the version numbers will again

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013): Version 2.10

2012-12-18 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: There is probably a version number in getstart that has to be adjusted (Stuart?) Done, and pushed to data/Docs/getstart.pdf and data/Docs/getstart-fr.pdf -Stuart

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013): Version 2.10

2012-12-18 Thread Curtis Olson
Thanks! On Dec 18, 2012 4:32 PM, Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: There is probably a version number in getstart that has to be adjusted (Stuart?) Done, and pushed to data/Docs/getstart.pdf and data/Docs/getstart-fr.pdf

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013)

2012-12-02 Thread Torsten Dreyer
All in all, for my part it seems rather a 2.10 than a 3.0 - some of the things which I'd like to see in 3.0 are done, but the majority isn't yet. This is probably true. To get to the 3.0 goal sometime in the near future, it's probably a good idea to create a backlog of open items

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013)

2012-11-27 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote: On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Thorsten Renk wrote:- rain bug - that still persists, rain is broken in Advanced Weather since currently setting the rain norm doesn't necessarily generate rain as the underlying system tries to be

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013)

2012-11-19 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Thorsten Renk wrote: - hires world scenery - no idea, but doesn't seem to be coming any time soon... Could someone point me at the current status of this please? I know there was some group discussion and an IRC chat session a couple of months ago. - rain bug

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013)

2012-11-19 Thread James Turner
On 16 Nov 2012, at 14:27, Torsten Dreyer wrote: 4. broken OSX downloads Yes - we need to improve the OSX builds. Does Jenkins provide stable binaries or do we still need a manual build provided by James or Tat? Jenkins provides binaries, the deployment issues were solved eventually (and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013)

2012-11-19 Thread jean pellotier
Le 16/11/2012 15:27, Torsten Dreyer a écrit : Hi, in just about one month from now we are entering another round of the release process, starting with the four weeks feature freeze period. This is probably a good time to check in all the great and fancy new features that still hide in your

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013)

2012-11-18 Thread Renk Thorsten
How should we call our new baby? Is it 3.0.0 or is it 2.10.0? This is a carry-over from our last release and gets answered along with: Is Rembrandt production ready? Hm, I had a list of items for a 3.0 half a year ago, so some progress chack along these lines: * Scanery-related 'Publish 3.0

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013)

2012-11-17 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi Torsten, Thanks for kickstarting the release process. On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: 1. A lack of stress testing. We have a four weeks testing period with release binaries publically available, so I am not sure how to improve that. Do we need more testers? Do we

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013)

2012-11-17 Thread ThorstenB
Am 17.11.2012 22:43, schrieb Stuart Buchanan: On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: 1. A lack of stress testing. We have a four weeks testing period with release binaries publically available, so I am not sure how to improve that. Do we need more testers? Do

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Next FlightGear release (Feb. 17 2013)

2012-11-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:27:52 +0100, Torsten wrote in message 50a64d68.80...@t3r.de: in just about one month from now we are entering another round of the release process, starting with the four weeks feature freeze period. This is probably a good time to check in all the great and fancy new