On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:38:20 -0500
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
- freeglut never implimented glut's fullscreen/game mode (so free glut
is *not* a complete drop in replacement for original glut.) Plus
freeglut 2.4 has the well know bug that bites us.
Just an odd pair of datapoints for you:
1.
Steve Hosgood wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
My vote is to build it with sdl. For 99.9% of the people out there,
sdl will work just fine and they won't be able to tell the
difference, and for the other 0.1%, freeglut won't work anyways
because they never actually implimented glut's game
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 09:15 -0400, Chris Metzler wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:38:20 -0500
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
- freeglut never implimented glut's fullscreen/game mode (so free glut
is *not* a complete drop in replacement for original glut.) Plus
freeglut 2.4 has the well know bug
Steve Hosgood wrote:
Folks:
There is a 0.9.10 version of FlightGear and SimGear in RPM form
suitable for Fedora Core 2,3,4 on:
ftp://tallyho.bc.nu/pub/steve/flightgear/
Would the main FlightGear site maintainers (and mirror-site managers)
please grab these and throw them in the existing
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
My vote is to build it with sdl. For 99.9% of the people out there,
sdl will work just fine and they won't be able to tell the difference,
and for the other 0.1%, freeglut won't work anyways because they never
actually implimented glut's game mode.
Curt.
SDL is
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
My vote is to build it with sdl. For 99.9% of the people out there, sdl
will work just fine and they won't be able to tell the difference, and
for the other 0.1%, freeglut won't work anyways because they never
actually implimented glut's game mode.
Does this mean
Martin Spott wrote:
Does this mean that you generally recommend using SDL for FlightGear
instead of GLUT on any platform if possible ? Is there any comparison
of SDL vs. GLUT with FlightGear ?
On FreeBSD 'configure' currently does not detect libSDL, but if the
mentioned is really your
7 matches
Mail list logo
