Hi,
Chris Wilkinson wrote:
Try the fgfs-builder package (download from
ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_rag/fgfs-builder/ or checkout
from http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/fgfsbuilder/branches/stable
using Subversion) ;-)
Does that require me to have the cvs/osg version of flightgear?
Hi,
I am using FGFS 0.9.10.I tried sending FGNetFDM structure(given in
net_fdm.cxx)(after doing htond or htonf) from one computer to another
computer running Flightgear but couldnt get it running. I tried Packet
Analyzer to check whether packets are reaching the particular PC or
not.Ifound that
Hi there,
Ralf Gerlich wrote:
Hi,
Chris Wilkinson wrote:
Try the fgfs-builder package (download from
ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_rag/fgfs-builder/ or checkout
from http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/fgfsbuilder/branches/stable
using Subversion) ;-)
Does that require me to have the
ypedef struct {...} mystruct_t;
mystruct_t anInstance;
char * sendbuffer = (char *)anInstance;
At the source computer I tried to print the char* sendbuffer by using
printf(Data=%s,sendbuffer);
But I cannot see any data packets formed.Is that i am using wrong format for
printf or is the
umesh pandey wrote:
[...] Can anyone provide me with sample UNIX
program to run Flightgear from external fdm data in the form of UDPpackets.
Another instance of FlightGear ? ;-)
To my understanding the NetFDM wasn't really designed to be driven by
anything but FlightGear on the same type of
On 12/12/06, Martin Spott wrote:
umesh pandey wrote:
[...] Can anyone provide me with sample UNIX
program to run Flightgear from external fdm data in the form of
UDPpackets.
Another instance of FlightGear ? ;-)
To my understanding the NetFDM wasn't really designed to be driven by
anything
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, umesh pandey wrote:
ypedef struct {...} mystruct_t;
mystruct_t anInstance;
char * sendbuffer = (char *)anInstance;
At the source computer I tried to print the char* sendbuffer by using
printf(Data=%s,sendbuffer);
Hi Umesh,
That printf() is quite unlikely to produce
Hi Curt,
Curtis Olson wrote:
The NetFDM packet structure is designed to work across platforms and the
data field sizes and types are somewhat carefully chosen to avoid packing
differences between compilers.
Hmmm, isn't NetFDM the copy the struct to a network packet-interface
or did I mix
--- Joacim Persson wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
- There is no trimming for different flight phases. Vertical speed is
purely controlled by power.
Many trikes has a trim function, just like all non-trainer hang glider
has
nowadays.
Many do, but mine doesn't :)
On 12/12/06, Martin Spott wrote:
Hi Curt,
Curtis Olson wrote:
The NetFDM packet structure is designed to work across platforms and the
data field sizes and types are somewhat carefully chosen to avoid
packing
differences between compilers.
Hmmm, isn't NetFDM the copy the struct to a
Curtis Olson wrote:
Yes, NetFDM is what you say, but we've made sure all our data aligns on 4
byte boundaries, we only use 4 or 8 byte data structures, and we send
everything in network byte order. With these rules, you would be hard
pressed to find a system that is incompatible. (This
Does anyone else on this list have SUSE 10.1 and the same troubles
I do? I've read elsewhere that SUSE is not too friendly with source
that might compile happily on fedora/debian/gentoo etc...
I have just set up a new suse 10.1 installation. I have SimGear, FlightGear,
TerraGear compiled from
On 12/12/06, Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
errrm, and, at least some of them don't even dare to think of
using current versions of FlightGear. I was told they're afraid of
running into the hassle of reworking half of their interface with every
new version of FlightGear, because
Curtis Olson wrote:
Work was done to improve the NetFDM structure prior to v0.9.10 so if you did
your experiements earlier than that, the picture has most likely changed.
I did most of my tests way before 0.9.8. Does this mean the current
NetFDM is safe for use with 64bit- as well as
On 12/12/06, Martin Spott wrote:
I did most of my tests way before 0.9.8. Does this mean the current
NetFDM is safe for use with 64bit- as well as big-endian systems ?
I don't have the ability to personally test a lot of combinations, but yes,
this should all work well as of v0.9.10.
Hi Durk,
here the patch, that fg searches for multiplayer aircraft in AI/Aircraft
first.
Maik
Maik Justus schrieb am 14.11.2006 18:15:
Hi Durk,
the length of the new directory is (of course not) the most important
aspect. I will change the patch to search for multiplayer aircrafts in
I want to replay my flight,read the flight path information from a file.
Fist,I record a flight path at 10 hz,5hz,or 2hz ,just like this:
--native=file,out,10,flight1.fgfs
and then I relay my flight,but I got a secction error!
--native=file,in,10,flight1.fgfs --fdm=external
but if I set ,just
Curtis Olson wrote:
This is probably not of wide interest, but it's kind of cool so I thought
I'd share it. Been working on an engineering data panel to show live
gauge
representations of important engineering parameters. I made a really
lousy
movie of the panel in action and posted it
My project need to drive multiplanes using external data saved in a file.Does I
have to study the multiplayer protocol?How to abuse that system to introduce
additional aircraft into the scene.
-
Take Surveys. Earn
The blip at the end shows a sky rendering bug with the latest OSG. :-)
Looks similar to what I've posted earlier:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg06962.html
20 matches
Mail list logo
