Hi ppl!
I've made some updates to fix.dat. I've submissed it to Robin today.
Is there a need to update it in flightgear too or will you wait
upstream update?
It's about 90 brazilian fix points.
Cheers
Douglas Campos
-
hi all,
taking off the mono-propeller planes with a simple joystick (e.g.
SideWinder) is very hard because of the propeller torque. you are
obliged to play with keyboard, and it is not very confortable, not to
say it is inefficient. I changed my own
Input/Joysticks/Microsoft/sidewinder.xml to
We have some huge file doc in .pdf format
That format is very difficult to be read, directly on screen, only one Way, to
print it.
Why that format ? , why don't we have the html format ?
How to translate that doc from .pdf to .html.
Regards
--
Gérard
gh.robin wrote:
We have some huge file doc in .pdf format
That format is very difficult to be read, directly on screen, only one Way,
to
print it.
What's the purpose? Typically PDF is an excellent choice for reading on
the screen as well as printing,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly -
--- gh.robin wrote:
We have some huge file doc in .pdf format
That format is very difficult to be read, directly on screen, only one
Way, to
print it.
Why that format ? , why don't we have the html format ?
How to translate that doc from .pdf to .html.
I assume you are referring to The
On Thu 18 January 2007 16:41, Martin Spott wrote:
gh.robin wrote:
We have some huge file doc in .pdf format
That format is very difficult to be read, directly on screen, only one
Way, to print it.
What's the purpose? Typically PDF is an excellent choice for reading on
the screen as well
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
However, as it is converted from the Latex source, it isn't as easy to
read as a pure HTML document. There is certainly room for improvement in
that area.
If you mean that the LaTeX source isn't easy to read (not to mention edit)
for people
Joacim Persson wrote:
If you mean that the LaTeX source isn't easy to read (not to mention edit)
for people unfamiliar with LaTeX/TeX, let me recommend LyX:
http://www.lyx.org/
Oh no, not yet another tool - it took me years to understand at least
partially how LaTeX works ;-)
gh.robin wrote:
Nice, i' ll transmit your answer to my requesters , and ask them to be
patient, before starting with FG.
Do it, if you like. If you expect me to hurry up, then please pay me
for the work on FlightGear-related stuff. Otherwise please refrain from
posting such obviously stupid
On Thu 18 January 2007 18:20, Joacim Persson wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, gh.robin wrote:
Oh, yes you are right , with a 21 inches CRT, and 2048x1536 these PDF
documents are readable.
Have you tried it with 15 inches and 800x600
I fail to see how it could matter for the viewability
On Thu 18 January 2007 19:15, Martin Spott wrote:
gh.robin wrote:
Nice, i' ll transmit your answer to my requesters , and ask them to be
patient, before starting with FG.
Do it, if you like. If you expect me to hurry up, then please pay me
for the work on FlightGear-related stuff.
gh.robin wrote:
On Thu 18 January 2007 19:15, Martin Spott wrote:
gh.robin wrote:
Nice, i' ll transmit your answer to my requesters , and ask them to be
patient, before starting with FG.
Do it, if you like. If you expect me to hurry up, then please pay me
for the work on
On 1/18/07, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
Today I found the video of this Ec 135, when it sank
in the snow. But the pilot managed it very clever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNQ1SCR2c-Amode=relatedsearch=
I ran that video in reverse and it looked just like one of my FlightGear
flights. :-)
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, gh.robin wrote:
The problem with pdf on screen is that the page layout is FIXED like it is
on paper. That is why it prints more consistantly , that page layout is
cast in stone. If you have a smaller screen or need larger text you have
to scroll _horizontally_ to read the
Hi,
gh.robin schrieb am 18.01.2007 18:46:
I respect your opinion, but i don't agree, if we reduce the format, the
letters are not readable,
or
we don't have
the same glasses,
the same brain,
the same equipment,
to use it.
Regards
I suppose
On Thu 18 January 2007 20:15, Joacim Persson wrote:
SNIP
Under the same conditions html reformats to fit.
Y
o
u
m
e
a
n
l
i
k
e
t
h
i
s
?
;
-
)
???
--
Gérard
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
Hi all,
I dropped some lines on Howto aerotow in the wiki:
http://wiki.flightgear.org/flightgear_wiki/index.php?title=Doing_aerotow_over_the_net
I would be very thankful, if someone could correct my English
Maik
-
Take
On Thu 18 January 2007 14:49, Sébastien MARQUE wrote:
hi all,
taking off the mono-propeller planes with a simple joystick (e.g.
SideWinder) is very hard because of the propeller torque. you are
obliged to play with keyboard, and it is not very confortable, not to
say it is inefficient. I
Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
I want to put this into CVS repository so here's the question.
Typically there are enough people capable of getting your aircraft into
CVS,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Martin Spott wrote:
Typically there are enough people capable of getting your aircraft into
CVS,
Done ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
