--- Olaf Flebbe wrote:
Hi,
I updated the build system and prebuilt parts for MS VC 2005:
* Used a Mathias-recommended CVS snapshot
* Now static executables are back again. I even added static pthread.
OpenAL is the only Dll left.
* Added a few more OSG subsystems
Martin Spott wrote:
BTW, it doesn't necessarily require you to hold an IFR rating, the same
counts for VFR flights as well as long as you don't have known terrain
in sight,^
's/known/familiar/g'
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly
On 1/31/07, Joacim Persson wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Tony Pelton wrote:
and as a passing comment, i wonder if one of the train simulators
might be a better train simulator that flightgear for your intended
purpose ...
Or better still, a car simulator. (Assuming the mentioned train
The hsi now responds correctly to simulated failure as commanded
by the heading indicator item on the instrument failure popup.
My handiwork can be found at
http://www.av8n.com/fly/fgfs/hsi.xml.htm
http://www.av8n.com/fly/fgfs/hsi.diff
I have not checked other hsi-like instruments to see
Hi Nick,
is this with plib, osg, or both?
Maik
Nick Warne schrieb am 30.01.2007 20:28:
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 19:23:52 Olaf Flebbe wrote:
Hi,
One easy way to replicate this is to use the Spitfire on the runway -
ensure brake lock is on, and open up the throttle - the aircraft
There used to be an --aircraft=c172-610x-jsbsim which was a
c172 with fullscreen, hires panel. It got removed because it
confused some users. I would like to re-introduce that *-set.xml
file under a new name that should even tell the dullest user
that the fact that there's no OTW view is not a
Please! Let's call it something obvious that hopefully won't confuse
people, or at least when people get confused we can give them a short
obvious clarification.
Curt.
On 1/31/07, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
There used to be an --aircraft=c172-610x-jsbsim which was a
c172 with fullscreen, hires
Did you /observe/ such drift, or is it just a theory?
Observation.
I see no evidence of this.
I do:
- starting fg with a c182
- opening property browser
- browsing to /instrumentation/heading-indicator
- observing properties indicated-heading-deg and offset-deg
- opening second property
* Curtis Olson -- Wednesday 31 January 2007:
Please! Let's call it something obvious that hopefully won't confuse
people, or at least when people get confused we can give them a short
obvious clarification.
Yes, that was the idea. :-)
The *-set.xml file isn't critical, as this is probably
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 16:43:23 Maik Justus wrote:
Hi Nick,
is this with plib, osg, or both?
Maik
Hi Maik,
This is with all, although it has been a few weeks since I built and used plib
version - but it happened then too.
Nick
Nick Warne schrieb am 30.01.2007 20:28:
On Tuesday
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
There used to be an --aircraft=c172-610x-jsbsim which was a
c172 with fullscreen, hires panel. It got removed because it
confused some users. I would like to re-introduce that *-set.xml
file under a new name that should even tell the dullest user
that the fact that
--- Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Curtis Olson -- Wednesday 31 January 2007:
Please! Let's call it something obvious that hopefully won't
confuse
people, or at least when people get confused we can give them a short
obvious clarification.
Yes, that was the idea. :-)
The *-set.xml file
* Stuart Buchanan -- Wednesday 31 January 2007:
I suggest using the latter, or something like c172p-panel-only-set.xml
Some users will otherwise associate it with the --enable-fullscreen
option.
OK. Good point. c172p-panel-only-set.xml is fine.
m.
On 01/31/2007 11:53 AM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
- starting fg with a c182
- opening property browser
- browsing to /instrumentation/heading-indicator
- observing properties indicated-heading-deg and offset-deg
- opening second property browser
- browsing to /orientation
- observing property
Am Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2007 20:13 schrieb John Denker:
For a properly-slaved DG or HSI or similar instrument, we
shouldn't be looking at /instrumentation/heading-indicator/*.
That's wrong.
However, it is also wrong to look at /orientation/*.
d'accord
There is a third way, the correct way:
On 01/31/2007 05:18 PM, I wrote:
Another migration strategy: The only
aircraft that would require fiddling are ...
It's even easier than I thought. The three that
presently provide power to the so-called DG also
provide power to the hsi, so AFAICT the patch
can be dropped in with no
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 22:18, John Denker wrote:
the new hsi.xml with no per-aircraft fiddling. The only
aircraft that would require flag day fiddling are the
three that already provide power to the so-called DG,
namely Spitfire, E3B, and KC135 ... unless I'm overlooking
something
Thanks to the updated Visual C++ 2005 instructions, I was able to compile what
I needed this afternoon (FINALLY!!!).
Thanks for any who were considering helping.
P.S. - If anyone is interested in obtaining the executable, send me an email.
- Original Message
From: Justin [EMAIL
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 21:59, AJ MacLeod wrote:
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 19:20, leee wrote:
I did a UK Class 56 diesel loco for a picture I was working on and
you're welcome to that but I didn't need any wagons for the pic so I cant
help you there. Perhaps a 'light' engine movement
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 14:05, Curtis Olson wrote:
On 1/31/07, Joacim Persson wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Tony Pelton wrote:
and as a passing comment, i wonder if one of the train simulators
might be a better train simulator that flightgear for your intended
purpose ...
Or
On 1/31/07, leee wrote:
The RS3D format isn't included on the OSG website but I wouldn't expect it
to
be as doesn't just include surface type objects but also mathematical ones
such as analytical solids.
For example, think of a simple cylinder. As an analytical solid it is
just
defined by
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 18:09, Joacim Persson wrote:
I have an idea of how to at least partially fix the problem with the wall
of weather when flying with METAR updates, which when flying on autopilot
in a light aircraft often, not to say usually, results in advanced
airobatic manouvers,
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 23:45, Curtis Olson wrote:
On 1/31/07, leee wrote:
The RS3D format isn't included on the OSG website but I wouldn't expect
it to
be as doesn't just include surface type objects but also mathematical
ones such as analytical solids.
For example, think of a
On 1/31/07, alexis bory wrote:
leee a écrit :
Thanks:) If you need something to drive down to the railway
station...
http://www.spatial.freeserve.co.uk/V3/im_GT40.16.jpg
wow :)
Did you also work on the FDM ?
And on the cockpit ;)
For what it's worth, if someone wanted to adapt one of
Hi,
* Tatsuhiro Nishioka -- Thursday 01 February 2007:
Thanks for removing n/N keys, Melchior.
I left these keys for backward compatibility but if there's a
problem, it should be removed.
Oh, there wasn't really a problem, other than data/cvs is meant
to be prepared for the next release.
On Thursday 01 February 2007 00:50, leee wrote:
On Thursday 01 February 2007 00:35, Curtis Olson wrote:
On 1/31/07, alexis bory wrote:
leee a écrit :
Thanks:) If you need something to drive down to the railway
station...
http://www.spatial.freeserve.co.uk/V3/im_GT40.16.jpg
Leee writes
It had occurred to me that YASim could be (ab)used to fake a
car. The gear handling would be fine for the wheels and
suspension - don't see too many problems there. Ensuring it
didn't take off might be trickier though.
Why not look at Torcs
It is built ontop of PLIB so
On Thursday 01 February 2007 01:10, Norman Vine wrote:
Leee writes
It had occurred to me that YASim could be (ab)used to fake a
car. The gear handling would be fine for the wheels and
suspension - don't see too many problems there. Ensuring it
didn't take off might be trickier though.
Melchior,
On Jan 31, 2007, at 4:41 PM, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Oh, there wasn't really a problem, other than data/cvs is meant
to be prepared for the next release. And for that I'm always
searching for things that can be cleaned up. And things that can
be done generically and globally
29 matches
Mail list logo
