Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] ac3d and materials

2009-03-19 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi Tim, On Tuesday 17 March 2009 19:58:02 Tim Moore wrote: That needs to be handled in the shader program. The OpenGL fog parameters are available as uniforms in shaders. Sure, but you need to rewrite that in every shader? Sure, that is the was OpenGL/OpenSceneGraph does this. How does this

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/AI/Aircraft/Fokker-50/Models fokker50.ac, 1.1, 1.2

2009-03-19 Thread Erik Hofman
Mathias Froehlich wrote: Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/AI/Aircraft/Fokker-50/Models In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2499/Aircraft/Fokker-50/Models Modified Files: fokker50.ac Log Message: Set the ambient color equal to the rgb color. This is what currently

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] ac3d and materials

2009-03-19 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi, Given this thread. I have checked in the change to simgear. I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submodels that I thought need some update. And I have updated all the ac models in the AI and the Models subdirectory. For the specific aircraft models, I do not want to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/AI/Aircraft/Fokker-50/Models fokker50.ac, 1.1, 1.2

2009-03-19 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Erik, On Thursday 19 March 2009 09:08:29 Erik Hofman wrote: To be honnest I don't like this action. I've always made sure all color settings were right in the modeller and did'nt adjust them to look nice in FlightGear in any way. Same goes for the F-16, T-37, T-38, Fokker 100, Fokker 70 and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/AI/Aircraft/Fokker-50/Models fokker50.ac, 1.1, 1.2

2009-03-19 Thread Erik Hofman
Mathias Fröhlich wrote: Erik, On Thursday 19 March 2009 09:08:29 Erik Hofman wrote: To be honnest I don't like this action. I've always made sure all color settings were right in the modeller and did'nt adjust them to look nice in FlightGear in any way. Same goes for the F-16, T-37, T-38,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] ac3d and materials

2009-03-19 Thread gerard robin
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote: Hi, Given this thread. I have checked in the change to simgear. I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submodels that I thought need some update. And I have updated all the ac models in the AI and the Models subdirectory.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Major cleanup of xmlauto.[ch]xx

2009-03-19 Thread Torsten Dreyer
I just checked in the new code and new documentation README.digitalfilter in both, the data and the source tree. The code should be fully compatible to existing autopilot configurations but adds some new options: - enable supports condition tags - a missing enable element now means enabled for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] ac3d and materials

2009-03-19 Thread gerard robin
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote: On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote: Hi, Given this thread. I have checked in the change to simgear. I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submodels that I thought need some update. And I have updated all the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] ac3d and materials

2009-03-19 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hello, what does that mean in future for me as 3d-modeller? What I have to change when using Blender? Rgards HHS Hi, Given this thread. I have checked in the change to simgear. I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submodels that I thought need some update. And I have

Re: [Flightgear-devel] hypothetical gpl question

2009-03-19 Thread Gene Buckle
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Tim Moore wrote: You don't have to provide sources with the binaries to comply with the GPL, you just have to make them available if the a recipient of the binary asks for them. In this case company A better have a plan in place for when an eventual paying customer asks

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: source/src/Scripting NasalSys.cxx, 1.120, 1.121

2009-03-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Frederic Bouvier -- Thursday 19 March 2009: Support old compilers - if(argc 2 or argc 3) + if(argc 2 || argc 3) Argh ... sorry! That's a contamination from Nasal. I don't get why g++ doesn't turn this nonsense off by default. Won't happen again. m.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] hypothetical gpl question

2009-03-19 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:28:26 -0700 (PDT), Gene wrote in message alpine.lfd.1.10.0903170627320.4...@grumble.deltasoft.com: On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Tim Moore wrote: You don't have to provide sources with the binaries to comply with the GPL, you just have to make them available if the a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] ac3d and materials

2009-03-19 Thread gerard robin
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote: On jeudi 19 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote: On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote: Hi, Given this thread. I have checked in the change to simgear. I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submodels that I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] maketg and makefg scripts

2009-03-19 Thread Geoff McLane
Hi Arnt, Please reduce the unnecessary 'size' of your emails. Sometimes it takes many clicks to get to anything you MAY have added. Instead of adding _ALL_ that has been said, pick out a little of the relevant context, if needed, like I do... ;=)) IT WILL NOT 'SEE' PLIB UNLESS

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Nasal tanker.nas, NONE, 1.1

2009-03-19 Thread gerard robin
On lundi 16 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote: While we are at it, here some comments on tanker.nas: There's a menu entry AI/MP-Tanker, which opens a small dialog where you can request a tanker. It'll contact you and tell you something like this: MOBIL3 at 15000, heading 130 with 250 knots,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Nasal tanker.nas, NONE, 1.1

2009-03-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009: With the usual AI tankers we have a lot of data regarding the Radar x-shift y-shift in-range , rotation, v-offset, .. and so on That tanker feature don't gives such information , it is missing , is it any valuable reason ? That's not

Re: [Flightgear-devel] maketg and makefg scripts

2009-03-19 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:36:46 +0100, Geoff wrote in message 1237480606.6461.3.ca...@dell02: Hi Arnt, Please reduce the unnecessary 'size' of your emails. Sometimes it takes many clicks to get to anything you MAY have added. Instead of adding _ALL_ that has been said, pick out a little

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Nasal tanker.nas, NONE, 1.1

2009-03-19 Thread gerard robin
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009: With the usual AI tankers we have a lot of data regarding the Radar x-shift y-shift in-range , rotation, v-offset, .. and so on That tanker feature don't gives such information , it is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Nasal tanker.nas, NONE, 1.1

2009-03-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009: Then, do you mean that the old Radar Fashion will be removed, what a pity. I haven't planned that (yet). But in the long run it should get removed. This was an early mechanism to get the brand-new AI models on the screen (for the T38?), and that was OK

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Nasal tanker.nas, NONE, 1.1

2009-03-19 Thread gerard robin
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009: Then, do you mean that the old Radar Fashion will be removed, what a pity. I haven't planned that (yet). But in the long run it should get removed. This was an early mechanism to get the brand-new AI

[Flightgear-devel] Atmosphere temperature model

2009-03-19 Thread Lauri Peltonen
Hi! First of all I'd like to say hi to all as this is my first message to this list! Hi :) Then, when messing around with fg, I noticed that the current atmosphere model is somewhat correct only on troposphere (around 12km or so), and I think some aircrafts we have can go higher than that. So I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atmosphere temperature model

2009-03-19 Thread John Denker
On 03/19/2009 04:43 PM, Lauri Peltonen wrote: First of all I'd like to say hi to all as this is my first message to this list! Hi :) Hi. I hope your contributions meet a better fate than mine have. Then, when messing around with fg, I noticed that the current atmosphere model is somewhat

[Flightgear-devel] ..the overlength reply with ./makefg DOUPD ADDDEBUG NOPAUSE log

2009-03-19 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:34:00 +0100, Arnt wrote in message 20090319213400.659ce...@a45.fmb.no: On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:36:46 +0100, Geoff wrote in message 1237480606.6461.3.ca...@dell02: ..I'll try, this time too, I'm afraid I must file a motion to file an overlength reply. ;o) ..no

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..the overlength reply with ./makefg DOUPD ADDDEBUG NOPAUSE log

2009-03-19 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:24:42 +0100, Arnt wrote in message 20090320042442.01b2d...@a45.fmb.no: ..now trying a ./maketg DOUPD ADDDEBUG NOPAUSE run to see if I get the same SG .configure failure as with ./makefg. a...@a45:/opt/bygg/tg $ ll /opt/bygg/tg/tmp/templog7.txt md5sum