Hi Thorsten,
On 07 Nov 2012, at 08:52, Renk Thorsten wrote:
If I'm not much mistaken, during the last year we got (in addition to
Rembrandt):
* atmospheric light scattering
* regional texturing
* placement masks for random objects
* procedural texturing
* Canvas with all the goodies
On 7 Nov 2012, at 08:24, Durk Talsma wrote:
Surely there must be something in this list which qualifies as major
innovation? Surely this is not _all_ my personal bias that I like certain
features? :-)
Please note that I never said that we didn't *have* any major new features.
The
On Wednesday, November 07, 2012 10:30:47 James Turner wrote:
Also, everything on Thorsten's lists is things that FS-X does, or has done
even for some time. Maybe not as good (but maybe better) as our solutions,
but again, that's no help for catching people's initial attention.
James
Hi Adrian,
On 07 Nov 2012, at 09:48, Adrian Musceac wrote:
What about AI traffic according to real-life schedules, for most major
airlines? That's something FS-X doesn't do out of the box.
That's certainly a good feature to mention and -as you may have guessed-
something I care about a
Hi Durk,
Please note that I never said that we didn't *have* any major new
features. The major difference between previous years and this year was
that we didn't have *obvious* eye catchers. Every feature you mention is
really a great improvement, but they are not sufficiently salient
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 10:48:27 +0100
Durk Talsma wrote:
On a more general note, the latter argument makes it really difficult to
convince these people that FlightGear might be worth considering. I've also
gotten a few questions about whether there would be commercial add-ons for
FlightGear,
Hi Thorsten,
On 07 Nov 2012, at 10:55, Renk Thorsten wrote:
Sorry, I don't want to talk down on the great job you guys are doing in
presenting all this, I'm just trying to understand what it is you consider an
eye-catcher. I'm just a bit mystified that somehow a feature which dominated
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, AJ MacLeod wrote:
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 10:48:27 +0100
Durk Talsma wrote:
It's definitely worth putting effort into promotion of FG, I'm sure the
vast majority of FSX (and probably X-Plane) users have almost no idea of
what it is or is capable of and there are bound to
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi Thorsten, So, what I was actually looking for was new ways of *using*
FlightGear, within the limitations of an internet-free environment. Our
lan based multiplayer server was very effiective in the past, and in the
last few years we also had some
Durk,
I don't know: FS-X can really impress:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XViCj0uqeco
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XViCj0uqecofeature=related
feature=related
Lots of wow! While we can do some, or perhaps even most of this, we can't do
it at an acceptable frame rate. (Er . can
adding to what Gene said;
first, we have the warping code developed and running in FG-2.6 for a
collimated display system.
second, we also run fgfs on a multi-core machine with three graphics cards.
Performance is around 50-60 fps for each core. and thanks to Jan Comans the 3d
clouds are
Le 07/11/2012 10:55, Renk Thorsten a écrit :
Sorry, I don't want to talk down on the great job you guys are doing
in presenting all this, I'm just trying to understand what it is you
consider an eye-catcher. I'm just a bit mystified that somehow a
feature which dominated our screenshot
Hi all,
The purpose of this little cosmetic patch is to ease the use of
proptest's output in a ploter.
Thanks to review,
Alexis
diff --git a/src/FDM/YASim/proptest.cpp b/src/FDM/YASim/proptest.cpp
index 9bdadef..cc4ffc4 100644
--- a/src/FDM/YASim/proptest.cpp
+++
Hi Gene (and John),
On 07 Nov 2012, at 15:31, geneb wrote:
Durk, if you can find someone that's willing to cut the parts for you, I'd
be happy to donate a drawing set for my single-seat collimated display
system. You show up next year with THAT and I can just about guarantee
most folks
Hello Martin,
I can not reach you by PM hence I send using mailing list as suggested
by Gijs.
1. I have the fix.dat.gz which reflects the latest AIS Japan data
https://aisjapan.mlit.go.jp/Login.doand was provided on Japan forum. I
already sent this to Robin to update but he is too busy to answer
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Durk Talsma wrote:
No worries. :-). This is actually fairly subjective, and I'm afraid that I
didn't explain my concern too well in my initial post. The real issue is
salience, which you can describe as the subjective property of a percept to
stand out from it's environment
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi Gene (and John),
On 07 Nov 2012, at 15:31, geneb wrote:
Durk, if you can find someone that's willing to cut the parts for you, I'd
be happy to donate a drawing set for my single-seat collimated display
system. You show up next year with THAT and
17 matches
Mail list logo
