Quoting Thomas Biwer :
Indeed, the problem seems to be in some plib code, since he points me
towards the file ssgloadac.cxx , line 898 which says: loader_fd =
fopen ( filename, ra ) ;
You need a newer plib ( svn or the proposed pre-1.8.5 tarball ). This line is
faulty and need to be changed
Olaf Flebbe
However, FG-OSG compiled using Olaf's stuff (for which we must be most
grateful) is both significantly slower to load and run than FG-Plib
compiled
with MSVC8 here.
You actually see a slowdown on loading ?
Yes, I haven't timed it exactly, but I would estimate 15=25%
2006/11/4, Olaf Flebbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could you please try to run it in the debugger and give the
traceback/Call Trace? Where does it crash exactly.
Maybe you have to add run time options: Right Click on Flightgear in
the Solution Explorer and Choose Properties Configuration
Hi,
i noticed that the version of flightgear i built from scratch using
cygwin takes significantly more time to start up (about 4-5
minutes) than the one i installed using the exe-file from
flightgear.org http://flightgear.org (about 1-2 minutes). is there
any specific reason for this
yeah thanks for the kind help,
i compiled it using MSVC8, i did follow your instructions, Olaf, taken from your homepage.
The problem is: FG crashes every time I try to start it. By running the --log-level=debugoptionI found out thatit quits at the point of initializing scenery subsystem giving
Hi,
i compiled it using MSVC8, i did follow your instructions, Olaf, taken
from your homepage.
The problem is: FG crashes every time I try to start it. By running
the --log-level=debug option I found out that it quits at the point of
initializing scenery subsystem giving out a
Hi Thomas,
I used cygwin to compile fg-cvs, meanwhile I used MSVC as editor while
compiling with cygwin. Then I found Olafs howto on the wiki and compiled
with MSVC without deinstalling cygwin. For openal I used the al.zip
archive from Olaf (after failing to use the files from the SDK from
Olaf Flebbe wrote
Hi,
i noticed that the version of flightgear i built from scratch using
cygwin takes significantly more time to start up (about 4-5
minutes) than the one i installed using the exe-file from
flightgear.org http://flightgear.org (about 1-2 minutes). is there
any
However, FG-OSG compiled using Olaf's stuff (for which we must be most
grateful) is both significantly slower to load and run than FG-Plib compiled
with MSVC8 here.
You actually see a slowdown on loading ?
-
Using Tomcat
Well, I cant access to the machine I was workin on right now, so I
will be able to tell you on monday what the debugger reports.
I am using the FG0.9.10 release version , not a cvs version and also
the matching SimGear (v.0.3.10) / base package versions.
Olaf: I did use the OpenAL version
Hi Olaf,
Olaf Flebbe schrieb:
However, FG-OSG compiled using Olaf's stuff (for which we must be most
grateful) is both significantly slower to load and run than FG-Plib compiled
with MSVC8 here.
You actually see a slowdown on loading ?
Didn't notice up to now (but I have
hey there,
i noticed that the version of flightgear i built from scratch using cygwin takes significantly more time to start up (about 4-5 minutes)than the one i installed using the exe-file from
flightgear.org (about 1-2 minutes). is there any specific reason for this and are thereany ways to
I think to answer quickly, the version we distribute in binary form is built with MSVC and you are building with cygwin. I think it has been reported in the past that cygwin has some serious IO efficiencies due to some sort of thread blocking. Apparently this isn't a priority for the cygwin team,
Hi Thomas,
I recommend to use MSVC Express. It is free and Olaf Flebbe has written
a excellent howto, linked from the flightgear wikki. He supports osg and
the plib-branch and has precompiled libraries to minimize your effort. I
have compiled flightgear from the scratch 2 times with cygwin and
14 matches
Mail list logo
