Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUD updates

2006-07-16 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Erik, On Friday 07 July 2006 23:13, Erik Hofman wrote: So, basically, no I won't maintain the ACMS FDM but lets keep it available anyhow. Ack. Greetings Mathias -- Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUD updates

2006-07-08 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 07 July 2006 23:13: Add to that the fact the I would need the data of a Flight Data Recorder which won't be easy to get your hands on. Of course, we do have real files from a data recorder. Someone from Brazil let us download them from a helicopter crash (with the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUD updates

2006-07-07 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Friday 07 July 2006 06:06, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Lee Elliott -- Friday 07 July 2006 00:48: I see you have done away with the test on ilcanclaw for the energy worm in hud_ladr.cxx [...] I have only commented it out for now, because it belongs to the special FDMs (SP_FDM) and has low

Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUD updates

2006-07-07 Thread Erik Hofman
Mathias Fröhlich wrote: BTW: is sombody out there maintaining the SP_FDM? I'm not sure about the ADA FDM but I would not want to see the ACMS FDM yanked since it has been (and can be) used to playback the information stored on the Flight Data Recorder (black box). Erik --

Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUD updates

2006-07-07 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Friday 07 July 2006 12:36, Erik Hofman wrote: Mathias Fröhlich wrote: BTW: is sombody out there maintaining the SP_FDM? I'm not sure about the ADA FDM but I would not want to see the ACMS FDM yanked since it has been (and can be) used to playback the information stored on the Flight Data

Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUD updates

2006-07-07 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:02:36 +0200, Mathias wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday 07 July 2006 12:36, Erik Hofman wrote: Mathias Fr�hlich wrote: BTW: is sombody out there maintaining the SP_FDM? ..I can do these, _after_ AirVenture, is 2 weeks from now. I'm not sure about the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUD updates

2006-07-07 Thread Erik Hofman
Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..I can do these, _after_ AirVenture, is 2 weeks from now.won't even think about ..you Erik maintain the ACMS fdm? Well both are a bit difficult to maintain since they relay on special setups or input files. The ACMS version for example needs the output file of a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUD updates

2006-07-07 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 23:13:09 +0200, Erik wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..I can do these, _after_ AirVenture, is 2 weeks from now. ... ..you Erik maintain the ACMS fdm? Well both are a bit difficult to maintain since they relay on special setups or input

[Flightgear-devel] HUD updates

2006-07-06 Thread Lee Elliott
Hi Melchior, Re your recent updates on the HUD code: I see you have done away with the test on ilcanclaw for the energy worm in hud_ladr.cxx and I've been doing this locally for a few years now. I couldn't trace the source of ilcanclaw or what it was supposed to do but testing for it usually

Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUD updates

2006-07-06 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Lee Elliott -- Friday 07 July 2006 00:48: I see you have done away with the test on ilcanclaw for the energy worm in hud_ladr.cxx [...] I have only commented it out for now, because it belongs to the special FDMs (SP_FDM) and has low priority. It was only used by the ADA FDM, whatever that