On Sunday 11 April 2010 03:21:54 Erik Hofman wrote:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Hi,
I commited changes to help users to tune their rendering quality
according to their available hardware. As a picture is worth a thousand
words, see :
http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgfs_quality_level.gif
- Ron Jensen a écrit :
Apparently there is a new PLIB with a fix for the Microsoft joystick
identification bug. It would be great if 2.1 (or 2.0.1?) were built
against that one instead of the broken one that prevents windows users from
correctly detecting their joysticks.
The fix is
- j'ai écrit :
- Ron Jensen a écrit :
Apparently there is a new PLIB with a fix for the Microsoft joystick
identification bug. It would be great if 2.1 (or 2.0.1?) were built
against that one instead of the broken one that prevents windows users from
correctly detecting their
On Monday 12 April 2010 04:19:55 am Pete Morgan wrote:
DO NOT WAKE up the webmaster and BFDL.
One release A year MUCH MORE than enough, decided upon At WILL and
RELEASED AT WILL by ME
FYI, I am currently FlightGear's release manager. Last year, there's been an
approximate 2-3 month lead-up
The major objective of having a master branch in my gitoreous repo is to
make the release process less onerous from the source code point of view.
Master is lagging a bit behind CVS at the moment, but that is actually part
of the plan. It seems like preparing the data tree for a release is still
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Hi,
I commited changes to help users to tune their rendering quality
according to their available hardware. As a picture is worth a thousand
words, see :
http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgfs_quality_level.gif
I encourage effect designers to use this new
If so, I'd probably recommend calling it an RC or similar. Hopefully,
that may stop the (few) whingers on the forum carrying on about how the
devs released another version that still isn't ready for prime-time
consumption...
OTOH, labelling it an RC might keep the others from downloading
Mattt wrote:
If so, I'd probably recommend calling it an RC or similar. Hopefully,
that may stop the (few) whingers on the forum carrying on about how the
devs released another version that still isn't ready for prime-time
consumption...
Well if I recall it correctly I've seen mostly
Erik,
True, and agreed.
Now, I double-dare you to try to explain that on the forum if 2.1
doesn't double their frame rates :p
Mind you, the individuals in question are certainly in the minority.
Unfortunately, though, that isn't seeming to stop them dragging others
along for their ride
Le 11/04/2010 11:21, Erik Hofman a écrit :
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Hi,
I commited changes to help users to tune their rendering quality
according to their available hardware. As a picture is worth a thousand
words, see :
http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgfs_quality_level.gif
I
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I was reading this forum thread few minutes ago :
http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5t=7358
and I wonder if its author, Thorsten with an 'H', already got in touch
with someone with CVS write access for a CVS inclusion. A new fgfs
version should have this.
I
Frederic Bouvier
Le 11/04/2010 11:21, Erik Hofman a écrit :
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Hi,
I commited changes to help users to tune their rendering quality
according to their available hardware. As a picture is worth a thousand
words, see :
Vivian,
Frederic Bouvier
I was reading this forum thread few minutes ago :
http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5t=7358
and I wonder if its author, Thorsten with an 'H', already got in
touch
with someone with CVS write access for a CVS inclusion. A new fgfs
version should
On Sunday 11 April 2010 01:17:50 pm Vivian Meazza wrote:
It is available for download, if you scrabble around hard enough - took me
best part of an evening to find it, and can't remember how I did it in the
end.
The trouble is Thorsten seems to develop his stuff in a vacuum - I have a
couple
I was reading this forum thread few minutes ago :
http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5t=7358
and I wonder if its author, Thorsten with an 'H', already got in touch
with someone with CVS write access for a CVS inclusion. A new fgfs
version should have this.
I talked to Thorsten
Mattt wrote:
If so, I'd probably recommend calling it an RC or similar.
Hopefully, that may stop the (few) whingers on the forum carrying on
about how the devs released another version that still isn't ready
for prime-time consumption...
OTOH, labelling it an RC might keep the others
16 matches
Mail list logo
