Hello, Stuart
Thanks a lot, for some reasons couldn't check out it.
We are confident.
Kind regards
Ahmad
On 14 July 2013 23:02, Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
Ah, that's my mistake.
To avoid .git files corrupting each
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
Ah, that's my mistake.
To avoid .git files corrupting each other, I downloaded your new version as a
tarball from gitorious and then copied it over the existing aircraft.
Of course,
that wouldn't have deleted the removed files.
I'll
Hello, Stuart
No, it is not your mistake, it is only the wrong process we are using,
regarding the Flightgear fgdata content , regarding how it must be used.
Unfortunately we are working with 56000 kbs speed communication line
when we can :(
To us fgdata is a monster.
Downloading data from
oh correct not 56000 kbs but only 56 kbs, i was dreaming
On 13 July 2013 17:13, grtuxhangar team hohora...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, Stuart
No, it is not your mistake, it is only the wrong process we are using,
regarding the Flightgear fgdata content , regarding how it must be used.
Hello,Stuart
Sorry for the huge mistake, thank a lot for the fix, and the time you spent
on it.
However, when looking at the
http://www.gitorious.org/fg/fgdata/trees/master/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader
and
http://www.gitorious.org/fg/fgdata/trees/master/Aircraft/PBY-Catalina
I notice there is a lot of
: hohora...@gmail.com
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] some models updates available
Hello,Stuart
Sorry for the huge mistake, thank a lot for the fix, and the time you spent on
it.
However, when looking at the
http://www.gitorious.org/fg/fgdata/trees
On 12 Jul 2013, at 14:40, Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com wrote:
What I always do when I get update packages instead of merge requests is to
delete the aircraft locally (not in Git) and then add the new package. That
way you will clearly see all deleted files, renamed case-insensitive
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, grtuxhangar team wrote:
Hello,Stuart
Sorry for the huge mistake, thank a lot for the fix, and the time you spent
on it.
However, when looking at the
http://www.gitorious.org/fg/fgdata/trees/master/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader
and
Hello, Stuart ,
Thank for your kind effort about it.
Since we have again uploaded a new version within our Git Project
https://gitorious.org/~eekpo, and since we can't check the actual content
of your official fgdata Aircraft directory ( like said we don't have any
high speed communication
Hi Ahmad,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:30 PM, grtuxhangar team wrote:
Hello, Stuart ,
Thank for your kind effort about it.
Since we have again uploaded a new version within our Git Project
https://gitorious.org/~eekpo, and since we can't check the actual content of
your official fgdata
Hi Ahmad,
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:28 AM, grtuxhangar team wrote:
Hello,
Crusader:
After check out , we have found some other mistake, landing gear and
catapult related.
=The landing gear did not behave correctly on water ( it should not take
any water solid ).
=The catapult force was too
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:20 PM, grtuxhangar team wrote:
Hello,
Back to the topic, since it was not a bug our models related, but only an
FG/OSG consistency issue, you may update fgdata/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader
and fgdata/Aircraft/PBY-Catalina, both should be right with the coming FG
2.12 .
Hi Stuart, Ahmad,
I would like to stress that there are OS out there that do not differentiate
AfterBurn.png from afterburn.png When you change the capitals of a file
(leaving the letters the same) without actually comitting the move to Git,
Windows (and some Mac) run into trouble. I fixed a
Hello, Stuart
Nice, we hope you will enjoy.
Hello, Gijs
No you don't have to worry about capitals, since our team is using and
testing with MS systems and or Linux systems.
There is not any fault with it .
IE: AfterBurn.png does not have elsewhere any other afterburn.png =
only one name .
Hello, Gijs
Sorry i misunderstood your remark, yes there is at the moment, two files
AfterBurn.png and afterburn.png.
Only one is being used.
The model which is using it, is pointing to AfterBurn.png , however it
could be pointing to afterburn.png when the OS does not makes the
difference,
Hi Ahmad,
No you don't have to worry about capitals, since our team is using and
testing with MS systems and or Linux systems.
There is not any fault with it .
Well, that's all nice, but there definitely IS a fault with it. If you take the
time to actually check the Gitorious link I sent (I
It can be useful to remove
F-8E-Crusader/Models/Textures-hires/texture12F/afterburn.png ( which is
less eye candy ).
Done. Thanks!
Gijs --
This SF.net email is sponsored by
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
It can be useful to remove
F-8E-Crusader/Models/Textures-hires/texture12F/afterburn.png ( which is
less eye candy ).
Done. Thanks!
Thanks for spotting and sorting this out Gijs.
I missed it in my review.
-Stuart
On 3 Jul 2013, at 22:58, Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for spotting and sorting this out Gijs.
My thanks especially, since it causes me terrible problems on Mac - git thinks
my tree is always dirty, so I can't rebase, which I how I normally pull.
If I had the script-fu I'd
Hello, Gijs
=Getting some erros on starting:
- Cannot find image file Images/particle.rgb
- Cannot find image file Images/smoke.rgb
- Cannot find image file Images/continous_smoke.rgb=
those message are Ghost messages
It came up 2 years ago when the osg formatmodel.osg was
Hello, Gijs
In order to get a cleaned ( i hope ) version within our Git repo, i will
tryto get in touch with our Guy who made that Git version.
he should be able to work on it.
You may prefer to wait for it.
Thanks a lot for checking and spotting these errors.
Sorry for it.
Ahmad
On
Hello,
Crusader:
After check out , we have found some other mistake, landing gear and
catapult related.
=The landing gear did not behave correctly on water ( it should not take
any water solid ).
=The catapult force was too weak.
the
F-8E-Crusader/Systems/landing-gear.xml
and
Hello,
Back to the topic, since it was not a bug our models related, but only an
FG/OSG consistency issue, you may update fgdata/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader
and fgdata/Aircraft/PBY-Catalina, both should be right with the coming FG
2.12 .
git clone g...@gitorious.org:eekpo/f-8e-crusader.git
git
NO, NO ,NO
sorry don't update these model within FG
I just notice the shaders are definitively broken with the today GIT fgfs
version.
As long as we have not found the cause.
Don't use our updates
Sorry
Ahmad
On 30 June 2013 01:59, grtuxhangar team hohora...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, Stuart
Hello, Stuart
I guess both planes Catalina and Crusader are again available in Git
git clone g...@gitorious.org:eekpo/f-8e-crusader.git
git clone g...@gitorious.org:eekpo/pby-catalina.git
should work for you.
You will notice: each aircraft have a separate repository thus the
directory
Hello, Stuart
I am AFK , i'll be back by the end of the week.
I don't know what has happened with these two projects, probably a mistake
from our team, which locked the access to our Git server.
I won't try to explain how is our organization, just to know we have a long
distance server (situated
Hi Ahmad,
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 3:06 PM, grtuxhangar team wrote:
Hello,
One of our member within our grthteam has been working on updates gpl
compliant regarding some old models which were done by Gérard many years
ago.
You may find these models updated at
https://gitorious.org/eekpo
Hello,
One of our member within our grthteam has been working on updates gpl
compliant regarding some old models which were done by Gérard many years
ago.
You may find these models updated at
https://gitorious.org/eekpo
at the moment
Have been updated, only
the F8E Crusader
Hi Ahmad,
Have you done any work on the water drop animation with the PBY?
Thanks,
Curt.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:06 AM, grtuxhangar team hohora...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
One of our member within our grthteam has been working on updates gpl
compliant regarding some old models which
When I tried to actually drop the water from the air, the animation was
wrong. The transparency was missing and the bloom just grew around the
aircraft and looked really strange and wrong. I had someone recently ask
about setting up a larger simulation system to do water bomber training so
I
30 matches
Mail list logo
