Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Sim Reset

2005-12-20 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
On Monday 19 December 2005 21:26, Alex Romosan wrote: The Interface is deleted and a new one is created. That is a bit crude, but it works ... it doesn't work anymore though: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1223874848 (LWP 22155)]

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Sim Reset

2005-12-20 Thread Stefan Seifert
Alex Romosan wrote: Alex Romosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + delete Atmosphere; Atmosphere=0; I know there's no real styleguide for FlightGear. But please let's stick to the one command per line rule. Lines are not that expensive after all :) And I think it's even more obvious, when

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Sim Reset

2005-12-20 Thread Christian Mayer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vassilii Khachaturov schrieb: IIRC a destructor can't call virtual methods, so if the interface needs to do some kind of cleanup it can only be something pertaining to this instance and using just the compile-time resolved calls. I haven't looked

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Sim Reset

2005-12-19 Thread Jon S. Berndt
0x0019 in ~logstream (this=0xbd3d3e8) at logstream.hxx:237 237 { (gdb) where #0 0x0019 in ~logstream (this=0xbd3d3e8) at logstream.hxx:237 #1 0x0812a812 in ~FGFDMExec (this=0xbd3d3e8) at FGFDMExec.cpp:173 #2 0x08113095 in ~FGJSBsim (this=0xb4b39e0) at JSBSim.cxx:308 What on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Sim Reset

2005-12-19 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Monday 19 December 2005 21:26, Alex Romosan wrote: The Interface is deleted and a new one is created. That is a bit crude, but it works ... it doesn't work anymore though: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1223874848 (LWP 22155)] 0x0019 in