-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Vassilii Khachaturov schrieb: > IIRC a destructor can't call virtual methods, so if the interface > needs to do some kind of cleanup it can only be something pertaining > to this instance and using just the compile-time resolved calls. > I haven't looked at the code you cite above so this might be irrelevant > there, but I am a bit suspicious because of the name "FGInterface" that > hints at an abstract class.
Not knowing if it helps (I don't even know about what part of the code you are talking about): Virtual functions can be avoided in many cases by using the so called Barton-Nackman trick (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barton-Nackman)... CU, Christian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDqFJFlhWtxOxWNFcRAr5eAJ42G38BOCWzN5QysINniU+2Tfp9sQCgt81Q 12s6Yq3RH93GlvlN3FUmcyA= =iW5n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
