Re: [Flightgear-devel] b1900d logo

2005-12-20 Thread Martin Spott
syd wrote: I see from user screenshots that my idea of a transparent logo for the B1900d was a bad idea . Don't worry, the B1900D is still several users all-time-favourite ;-) I wouldn't care that much for the logo. I consider performance numbers to be of higher priority: You need to reach at

Re: [Flightgear-devel] b1900d logo

2005-12-20 Thread Jean-Yves Lefort
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:59:36 + (UTC) Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: syd wrote: I see from user screenshots that my idea of a transparent logo for the B1900d was a bad idea . Don't worry, the B1900D is still several users all-time-favourite ;-) I wouldn't care that much for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] b1900d logo

2005-12-20 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Jean-Yves Lefort wrote: As far as I know, rotation speed with no flaps and a service payload is about 105/110 kts. I could lift it at that speed some weeks ago, but some changes in the yasim code and/or in the b1900d.xml file caused a regression. Looking back through CVS, I think the big

Re: [Flightgear-devel] b1900d logo

2005-12-20 Thread Martin Spott
syd wrote: I see from user screenshots that my idea of a transparent logo for the B1900d was a bad idea . I always assume that if it works on my computer it must work on everyone else's:) BTW, my screenshot overhead the Tempelhof building was done on Win32, the logo looks correct on XOrg