Moin !
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
If you like, here is the original after which I try to build the model:
http://www.littlewing-air.de/fotoshow/index_fotoshow.html
Fein Bietet Ihr vielleicht auch verguenstigt Type-Ratings fuer
FlightGear-Aktivisten an !? ;-)
Tschuess,
Martin.
--
Erik Hofman wrote:
1. $FG_ROOT should be a global value
2. ~/.fgfsrc should be a personal preference
3. fgfs --fg-root should be a one time option overriding the defaults
Does anybody have any objection to reversing the order?
_I_ don't object, to my impression you proposal is the only one
Hello Jon, I hope you didn't get me wrong:
Martin Spott wrote:
I see that SWBD might have slightly more detail in certain areas as it
follows even small quay walls but the staircase mode in SWBD makes it
insuitable for creating FlightGear shorelines right out of the box. It
may well
Andrea Vezzali wrote:
Hi All! Some time ago on the mailing list I read something about
multiplayer's voice comunication, does anyone is working on that?
No, the solutions that people proposed in the past had been blessed
with disregard by most FlightGear developers.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Christian Mayer wrote:
Martin Spott schrieb:
Could you probably back this with an explanation ? Voice-based ATC is
done all over the world, why should'nt FlightGear do this as well ?
I understand the point that a real voice service does only make sense
when there is an ATC service
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
A RADAR station can be implemented as a listener to the server, so the
server
sends information of aircrafts to the radar just as to any other client.
Maybe I have to add some minor changes to the server code, but all in all it
should be pretty simple to create a
Hello Durk,
Durk Talsma wrote:
I still haven't firmly decided how ATC should interact with AI traffic, but
that these systems should be integrated has always been part of my
overarching design plan. Since my AI developments are based on extending the
AIModels code, this would naturally
Erik Hofman wrote:
Stuart Buchanan:
- Provide a Nasal interface to display simple text messages on the screen
like the ATC display. In fact, I copied the code from the ATCDisplay.cxx
and simply shifted it further down the screen.
Erik:
TODO: Integrate the two pieces of code.
I'm
John Wojnaroski wrote:
Not sure this is what you're looking for.
http://openatc.sourceforge.net/test/
IIRC there were some discussions about an ATC program that would work
with the TNL libraries, and I seem to recall a project page on SF. But,
as noted, it seems to have vanished...
Yep, I
Durk Talsma wrote:
One alternative possibility would be to work with separate scenarios: 1)
Human
Multiplayer, Human ATC only,, no AI traffic using voice comms; 2) Human
Multiplayer, plus AI traffic, Using AI ATC, and predefined text messages;
Scenario 2) has a very small but significant
Drew wrote:
First, I have a customized version of 0.9.8 running, in which I made several
customizations. It will be no small task to repeat the effort if I decide
to upgrade to 0.9.9.
Why don't you share your customizations with the public ? I'd say this
is common use in the
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I was hoping that it might enable me to run Jon's new KSFO scenery with
Tiger data, [...]
Ah, I knew once someone would try TIGER data with FlightGear :-)
Is there any public notion of this Scenery ?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who
Martin Spott wrote:
I'm going to summarize how to interface to the DB. In principle we're
offering two interfaces:
1.) Online-interface to the DB - you have to talk the PostgreSQL wire
protocol (using 'libpq') and do some SQL,
2.) Shapefile-import into a predefined bounding-box
Christian Mayer wrote:
The universal solution is to download the plane from the person who uses
it (the download protocoll must be included in the FGFS network code).
Wouldn't it be much easier if people simply contribute their work to
the community ?
Look, someone uses a free, OpenSource
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
i made a new aircraft and placed it here:
http://www.t3r.de/fg/ogel/
Oh, this one looks nice !!
Curt, would you add this to your 'collection' ?
Thanks,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Major A wrote:
I'd love to see human ATC (like VATSIM) becoming reality one day, so I
can ditch FS2004 and X-Plane and fly online with fgfs. Has there been
any progress on that so far? If there's interest, I can tell you what
I like and what I dislike about the way it's done in VATSIM, though
Hello Jon,
Jon Stockill wrote:
http://flightgear.stockill.org.uk/testing/BaseSceneryWithTiger.tgz
Thanks for posting the link.
Can you share your experience with us how to size the hardware in order
to run this scenery ? I know TIGER is _very_ detailed and, analogous to
Ralf's scenery, certain
Paul Surgeon wrote:
I'm not sure which would be more work to achieve but I recently discovered
the
GRASS plugin for QGIS which allows you to edit and digitize GRASS data inside
the nice and friendly QGIS GUI.
To my knowledge QGIS functions as a nice GUI to GRASS, the data
handling is
dene maxwell wrote:
Having read the posts concerning the World Scenery Databse and other
associated posts, I am concerned that I won't be able to share the changes I
have made to the scenery tiles around my local (NZWN) with others.
This is sad but in fact it's the case. One of the major
Steve Knoblock wrote:
About three years ago, I started working on a project to enhance the
area around the Chesapeake bay region. I hope to donate this data and
whatever objects, traffic and airport improvements to FlightGear.
Oh, you're welcome. We already _have_ a site that collects scenery
May I proudly present
I can't believe it, there actually is a photo on the net that shows the
aircraft that I did most of my trainig on. It also features my
intructor on the co-seat :-)
http://www.flugzeugbilder.de/show.php?id=249541
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly -
Georg Vollnhals wrote:
nice - but now we want to get a photo with *you* on the pilot's seat :-)
You'll see me tomorrow in the EENE hopping along the North Sea Islands
- if the weather permits
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
dene maxwell wrote:
Great, that sounds a good way of doing it. If any one is very keen to try
the new scenery before the official release we can make off-line
arrangements to distribute it and I can tag it with alpha test status then
when the official release comes out everyone will be
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I have today sent a bug fix to Erik for some outstanding problems with the
multiplayer implementation, but which also includes extrapolation of the
client position using 1st and 2nd derivatives.
Now, I'm thrilled to hear that, this is definitely the right (TM)
direction !
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Making install in Main
make[3]: *** No rule to make target
`../../src/FDM/JSBSim/filtersjb/libfiltersjb.a', needed by `fgfs'.
same problem here (Cygwin, latest FlightGear CVS). Did a complete new
download of all source files but the error is still there.
do you
dene maxwell wrote:
One thing I have noticed, we have alot of urban areas on very steep hill
sides. This draping approach can cause some very unpleasant visual effects
in these instances...the terrain looks ...stretched... like drawing a
picture on a piece of rubber then stretching it more
Dene,
dene maxwell wrote:
[...]
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name=JonStockill Email.jpg
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=JonStockill Email.jpg
Do you really think you're getting new friends by posting such images
to the list ?
Martin.
--
Unix
Norman Vine wrote:
Until I get chance to add that you can actually search by partial
lat/lon - so for example searching with lat=50.1 would return everything
from 51.0 to 51.9
repeat after me PostGIS PostGIS ... :-)
is already in the works. I've already started designing
Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
The patch is available from
http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/getstart/features.tar.gz
Great, I'll have a closer look tomorrow,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Durk Talsma wrote:
- The lake, river, and canal areas around the city of amsterdam are much
improved: The North Sea canal, which connects amsterdam to the north sea is
now accurately represented, as well as some artificial lakes surrounding the
new flevoland area are now accurately
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Sorry, I meant to and missed cvs committing it, should be committed now.
Great,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
dene maxwell wrote:
Sort of associated with your river issue is the issue of railways and the
sections of railways that are through tunnels this particularly effects
me as two of the longest rail tunnels in the southern hemisphere are in my
local area and it looks silly to have them
Hello Curt,
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
As we've discussed before, OSG is a worthy option, but it is 'not
trivial' so to speak to switch scene graph libraries out from under such
a complex application as FlightGear, [...]
I know that my sole intention was to prevent people from
straining
Mark wrote:
As far as I see it, the manual alteration of the city textures should be
kept as an option.
By default the use of the regional textures makes more sence, since
modifying every town would be just too time consuming.
Using the poligons as a virtual marker for the regions sounds
Hello,
I just took the latest CVS for a ride, starting at EDWJ and heading to
EDDW. To ease the job I tried to engage the autopilot via the menu -
but the autopilot pull-down menue is inactive, the word Autopilot in
the headline is greyed-out. Is this intentionally ?
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Martin Spott wrote:
I just took the latest CVS for a ride,
using the default aircraft,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
[autopilot menu entry disabled for the default aircraft]
* Martin Spott -- Saturday 28 January 2006 19:45:
Ah, that's ok. This doesn't make it easier to realise my plan but I
will accept the facts :-)
$FG_ROOT/Nasal/gui.nas, line 71 ... it's all yours! :-)
Many
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I'm going to be out of town Feb 7-14 for Scale 4x in Los Angeles so the
release won't happen until sometime after that.
After the v0.9.10 release, I would really like to make our final push
toward v1.0.
This timeframe sounds like a good start - I think it's the
Hello Erik,
Erik Hofman wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/FlightGear/tests
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv19690
Modified Files:
Makefile.am
Added Files:
al-info.c
Log Message:
Add a gl-info equivalent for OpenAL.
Does this test rely on the recent OpenAL CVS or
Hello Erik,
Erik Hofman wrote:
I run the latest CVS version of OpenAL.
Which trick do you use to get the aut-tools working ? They don't work
for me with OpenAL CVS. This one reason is why I recommend to stick
with the older OpenAL source.
I've updated al-info.c to fix those problems and
Erik Hofman wrote:
You might want to run CMake on them, that works for me on my PC.
Sounds interesting - never heard about that.
Thanks,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Hello David,
David Megginson wrote:
It looks like the TerraGear tools are misreading the coverage types of
the lakes, treating them (incorrectly) as ocean.
I hope this will get easier for the tools once different data for
oceans and lakes is being used. Can you at least affirm that the shape
Erik Hofman wrote:
I've added three images of FlightGear in the Un-edited section already.
http://www.screenshotart.com/
http://www.screenshotart.com/index.php?act=modulemodule=gallerycmd=sccat=69
Do you consider it as a good or as a bad sign that I didn't identify
the FlightGear
alexis bory wrote:
Martin Spott a écrit :
The green radomes on your screenshot, are these part
of our standard scenery ?
No, I did just begin to add some models to my own scenery, thanks to
fred's tools. I have to figure out how to add them in the FlightGear
Scenery Database.
Send them
Lee Elliott wrote:
However, if people are flying it and liking it I don't want to
break it for them, so it would be handy if people could let me
know if they're using cvs FG or the last official release,
I've almost always been using CVS.
I honour your intention not to break anything, on
Erik Hofman wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/FlightGear/src/AIModel
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv3596/src/AIModel
Modified Files:
AIBase.cxx AIBase.hxx AIManager.cxx AIManager.hxx Makefile.am
Added Files:
AIMultiplayer.cxx AIMultiplayer.hxx
Log Message:
Vivian
David Megginson wrote:
On 10/02/06, Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.texelairport.nl/fotogroot2004/D-EFFV.jpg
Looks like an Archer (PA-28-181) -- nice plane.
It definitely is a really great thing: You can load four people
(including my instructor and his girlfriend
David Megginson wrote:
I wouldn't object to a Garmin 430 in my Warrior to help with IFR flight, to
allow me to fly approaches into more airports and to fly off airway.
You know that the GNS430 not only replaces your HSI/ADF equipment but
the NAV/COMM as well Having used the GNS430 with
dene maxwell wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Exactly this is the one which I took for the largest trips:
http://www.texelairport.nl/fotogroot2004/D-EFFV.jpg
Martin, Which one did you mean? The foreground or background :-
The one in the background is for married couples and I'm not (yet
Lee Elliott wrote:
Funny where you are sometimes, when ideas occur to you. I was in
the shower, [...]
I know this phenomenon. You typically get the best ideas while being at
places where there's no chance to write them down: In the shower, on a
boring ride with the car or on the toilet
Tiago Gusmão wrote:
Anyway, my biggest problem right now is that it's eating 10fps in my
GF4MX without actually drawing anything.
Any tips for increasing performance in render-to-texture? If not, is
this performance unacceptable?
I think you are actually facing the most obvious problem of
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
some of you might remember: I'm working on a Seneca-Model. This is just to
show you, that I am still alive.
Wow ! As this seems to become one of the most realistic aircraft in
FlightGear the question arises if FlightGear/JSBsim already models carb
icing and heating !?
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Unfortunately I could not get the 3D cockpit finished for the release
so I have had to retain the trusty 2D panel.
We're waiting for you :-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Mike Rawlins wrote:
--prop:/radios/nav/frequencies/selected-mhz[0]=110.00
I managed to set the NAV frequency on the B1900D with this property:
--prop:/instrumentation/nav/frequencies/selected-mhz[0]=117.45
but I still was unable to get the VOR into a working state :-/
Cheers,
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
It does sound like you don't specify --enable-distance-attenuation or
that your hardware doesn't support GL_DISTANCE_ATTENUATION_EXT
[...]
That does really help ... would it make sense to add a distance
attenuation option to the rendering options?
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..FG being a meritocracy, you qualify on your merits and on stepping
forward. The more people we have doing cvs commits, the easier the
work load gets on each, [...]
I don't think this is a good solution. The more people have CVS write
access the less responsibility each
alexis bory wrote:
10 more days and I will put a .tgz too :)
I'dd suggest you to already submit those parts that you consider to be
in a useful state - even if the whole cockpit is still not complete,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
alexis bory wrote:
I'd like to upload some thing clean ( shall I upload to
ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/incoming/ ? )
Sorry, no, this upload directory is for scenery models only as I don't
write to the CVS tree (except from changes to The Manual),
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user
dene maxwell wrote:
From: Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A separate A-10-3Dcockpit would make the existing A-10 redundant
- who would want to fly it without your cockpit? :)
Maybe those langishing on 098a? From what I've seen of Alexis cockpit, I
would love to fly it with his cockpit, as I
dene maxwell wrote:
I would hate to see a aircraft that works under 098a and perhaps earlier
that is enjoyed by many users overwritten and possibliy become
unavailable.
Nobody holds you back from keeping a copy of the old aircraft
implementation, you just don't get all the new featuers,
dene maxwell wrote:
I regret any offence I may have caused you. Given that this not the first
time I have caused you personal offence. After careful consideration I feel
it is prudent that I hang up the keyboard on the developer lists, at least
until such time as I can afford hardware that
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
While we are at it, I'd like to add another request - not that much a
feature request:
It's pretty likely that we're going to have a booth at the Linux-Tag
exhibition in Wiesbaden on May 3 - 6, 2006. In order to present the
local area to the visitors
Pigeon wrote:
Anyway, maybe you can setup a local (as in local to the show) server
and local FGMap. And have the server linked to os's and my server too.
That makes much sense - I just didn't dare to expect that bidirectional
replication between servers is possible
Martin.
--
Unix
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Did someone say they were working on a Seneca model for FlightGear? A
while back I was able to sit inside a brand new seneca and take a
boatload of pictures.
Nice pictures - although you might expect that the person who's
building the Seneca is himself owner of the
Martin Spott wrote:
Yesterday evening I was confirmed that we _will_ get a free booth on
the LinuxTag show (3rd to 6th May). Now several things come into my
mind that would help us to make our presence on the show a success and
that we probably won't find the time to do everything ourselves
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Martin Spott -- Friday 03 March 2006 09:12:
would you mind taking into account that we (hopefully) someday
will have carburator heating for certain piston-engined aircraft
being modelled in Flightgear ?
We'll take that into account once it was (hopefully) implemented
Detlef Faber wrote:
I would like to do some scenery work, but as I don't live in Wiesbaden I
might do some generic models of rhine bridges or Highways. Also I like
to put some AI ships on the rhine. Finally, what do you think about a
Ju-52 in a Linux Tag livery?
Oh, that would be a great
Roberto Inzerillo wrote:
There's also ETOU airport at high resolution (is that civil or military?).
ET?? is always European military,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Jon Stockill wrote:
I think there have been objects added for that area, but the screenshots
I've seen seem to indicate that a lot more are available. The power
station data for Germany was added this morning, so that'll give a few
hundred more objects when it's exported tonight. Just a
Hello,
when compiling the current CVS tree on IRIX/MIPSpro I get several
Errors in 'mk_viii.cxx':
CC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/Include -I../.. -I../../src
-I/opt/include -I/usr/freeware/include -Xcpluscomm -I/opt/FlightGear/include
-I/usr/local/include -O2 -use_readonly_const
Melchior Franz wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/FlightGear/src/Environment
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv20857
Modified Files:
environment_ctrl.cxx environment_ctrl.hxx
Log Message:
Jean-Yves Lefort: fix crash on exit
Thanks ! I won't comment on the 'style' of the fix
Drew Kirkpatrick wrote:
Once again with the help of Poine (still owe ya that beer man), I
found my problem. So the way network communications is happening with
net_ctrls, and the FGNetCtrls object, the non-portability of the
mechanism is readily apparent.
I know, playing the 'weisenheimer'
David Megginson wrote:
The TerraGear scenery bug with the Great Lakes (and possibly other
large inland lakes?) is pretty serious -- it leaves many midwest U.S.
and central Canadian cities perched on giant cliffs overlooking the
lakes.
I'd call this an early pre-release, especially because
Martin Spott wrote:
While the machine performs quite well as WWW-, FTP- and database server
(as well as our local fileserver !), is was not sized to to the job of
an online web mapping server. The server is running only with 256 MByte
of RAM at a 400 MHz clock cycle, [...]
Sorry: 440 MHz
Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
P.S. Yes, I know that the HTML version of the manual on the FG website is
now quite out of date. We/I should get that sorted for the new release.
Indeed, I wanted to have that already done but covered myself with
other stuff
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user
Hello David,
David Megginson wrote:
GSHHS is excellent for ocean shorelines and bays, but wildly
inaccurate for large inland bodies of water (especially the Great
Lakes).
You should have a look at the new 1.3 dataset from October last year,
this is where the split between the different types
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Martin: please explain again in very great detail for me how exactly
GSHHS has been improved?
I didn't compare the shorelines of the whole world between old and new
version :-)
I actually had a look at a few places (my personal favourites) and
noticed something that
David Megginson wrote:
The problem might be that TerraGear is now cropping against just the
landmass -- it actually has to crop against the union of the landmass,
islands, lakes, and everything else.
I'm pretty sure this is the correct explanation - even without looking
at the code :-)
The
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
I can confirm that at the cruise speeds, I haven't seen the prop disk
on the planes I've flown. However, I only flew 2-blade props, maybe with
more blades the feeling is different?
I wouldn't say so, but maybe this depends on the colour of the blades.
'Our'
Georg Vollnhals wrote:
I only had a very short flight with the updated A-10 and just want to
give some feedback
1. the quality of your panelwork is phantastic!
Screenshots !? ;-))
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Lee Elliott wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 01:47, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
2. although this is *not* your problem as you are doing the
panel work, I want to report that is was not nice to fly the
a/c by hand, I then used the autopilot.
It behaves very sensible on the nick axis and lame on
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/seahawk/Models
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv5664
Added Files:
strop.xml
Log Message:
Part of new strop handling method
What do you mean with strop ? I don't know such a piece. You don't
mean strobe ?
Yesterday evening I had my first set of NVFR traffic circuits in order
to get my general NVFR permission. Because traffic circuits late in the
evening are not allowed at 'home', EDLN, we took off and headed for
EDLE, approx. 20 minutes east of EDLN.
EDLE has a nice, old-style rotating beacon on
Georg Vollnhals wrote:
--prop:sim/current-gui=1
This has changed recently. Try:
--prop:/sim/gui/current-style=1
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
Georg Vollnhals wrote:
2. with this new parameter FG crashes to desktop when I try SHIFT+F10 (I
think I tried 2 - 3 times, no effect, than CTD)
I've never used Shift-F10, always only F10 to enable the menubar,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends
Julien Pierru wrote:
I added a Teamspeak server on my machine. [...]
Regarding the information I managed to gather, Teamspeak is commercial
software and the sound is considered to be of noticeable lower quality
compared with known VoIP setups.
I know I won't prevent people from using their
Julien Pierru wrote:
Exactly Vassilii that was the idea as a testing tool for what we will need
to either find or develop to use with FG.
We have to start somewhere.
I agree entirely, I just wanted to prevent Teamspeak to be officially
promoted as 'the' communication protocol/software for
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
want to have a look at OpenPBX once the 0.2 release is out. I _suspect_
there will be better conference support for OpenPBX because the
fathers of Asterisk at Digium always tried to firmly couple conference
support to the presence of one of their interface boards
Hello Curt,
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I've added a very short entry in our events section on the FG web site.
Feel free to expand on that a little bit if you like and send me the
results. Or if you are happy with the current text we can just leave it
alone.
Thank you for adding the
Hello David,
David Megginson wrote:
1. Like most airport lighting, they're pretty much impossible to see
at night if the airport is near a lit-up residential area.
My experience is different. What you describe resembles me of the white
flash lights that sit on top of newer control towers. The
Julien Pierru wrote:
Where do I have to send my files?
In general you can send these to Jon or to me, additionally we have an
FTP upload directory:
ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/incoming/
Especially for the pyramids I think you should contact Jon,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_
Jon Stockill wrote:
http://fgfsdb.stockill.org/news.php?offset=12
We'd probably put this on a static page,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
Julien Pierru wrote:
Also how come the sand is not present in the scenery?
I think it's simply not defined for that area in the VMAP0 dataset,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 07:40, Julien Pierru wrote:
Teotihuacan pyramid complex:
http://flamebunny.homelinux.net/pics/fgfs/Teotihuacan.jpg (20m NE of Mexico
City MMMX on heading 045);
Nice, but we clearly see a nasty scenery bug there --- there is no river
Julien Pierru wrote:
http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=3D19.693701,-98.845561spn=3D0.016544,0.0217=
15t=3Dkhl=3Den
In order to make this URL work you have to remove every occurrence of
3D and remove the = before the line break as well:
I was just looking after the different copyright notices that people
attach to their contributions related to the FlightGear project and
noticed, that there is no COPYING file in the FlightGear source tree.
Maybe someone could simply copy the one over from the base package -
not the Simgear tree
Hello Syd,
two points I would like to comment on:
syd sandy wrote:
The flight dynamics seem a bit off , Im not sure if anyone modified them
again , but it seems to want to stall at take off speeds... I want to
fix that , but I think someone may have tweaked it to be more accurate
...
Hello,
I browsed the property tree but I didn't find any switch that allows me
to toggle the units for the altimeter reference pressure in the b1900d.
Currently EDDW has a QNH of 1001 hPa and I would like to set the
altimeter in the b1900d accordingly.
Any chance ?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_
Hi Thomas,
Thomas F??rster wrote:
You're flying without conversion tables on your knees, brave pilot... ;-)
Try the 'metar' tool, it gives both hPa and Inch mercury, i.e. $ metar eddw
I know I could convert into in. Hg and set the altimeter accordingly,
this is what I actually do if
Hello Shavlir, welcome to the club :-)
For each of the three mentioned topics I there's a different answer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to improve Chicago:
fix the coastline as it seems to be about a half mile off to the west
The infrastructure ís currently in the works, but yet not
1 - 100 of 2039 matches
Mail list logo
