[Flightgear-devel] Suggestion to make FlightGear multiplayer compliant with HLA

2008-03-04 Thread Petr Gotthard
Dear FlightGear developers,(a short introduction first: I'm a newcomer to FlightGear, my professional profile can be found at http://www.linkedin.com/in/gotthard) May I ask whether you would be interested on striving to make FlightGear compliant with the US DoD High Level Architecture (HLA)?

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Suggestion to make FlightGear multiplayer compliant with HLA

2008-03-06 Thread Petr Gotthard
Hi Oliver, the HLA specifications (IEEE 1516) are not free, that's a disadvantage. However there are open-source HLA run-time environments (e.g. http://www.cert.fr/CERTI), so it's not necessary to implement whole new HLA run-time environment. Regarding the multiplayer in FlightGear I see two

[Flightgear-devel] [RFC] Dynamic plug-in interface for I/O modules

2009-06-26 Thread Petr Gotthard
Hello, I'd like to bring up again the issue of standalone FlightGear modules (add-ons, plug-ins). You probably hear this question once a while, but I have a new argument. ;-) Although the FlightGear design fairly modular it's provided as a single binary. Everyone who wants to create a new I/O

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] Dynamic plug-in interface for I/Omodules

2009-06-26 Thread Petr Gotthard
Petr Gotthard wrote: To follow the do things right rule I think it would be great to implement a generic interface for standalone I/O modules. Both Micro$oft FSX and X-Plane have such interface. The MS HLA users would just need to build a shared module (.dll or .so) for a particular HLA RTI

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] Dynamic plug-in interface for I/Omodules

2009-06-26 Thread Petr Gotthard
All valid points but irrelevant for the GPL. It is already possible to connect proprietary software to FlightGear using the generic binary (socket) protocol handler, but that doesn't violate the GPL. Plug-in interfaces tend to do because they are considered 'part of the program' by the GPL.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] Dynamic plug-in interface for I/Omodules

2009-07-01 Thread Petr Gotthard
Hi Mathias, Thank you very much for your comments. So, as far as I knor HLA/RTI, your problem is divided in two parts: 1. The problem with different RTI implementation libraries. 2. The problem with different fom's Regarding the RTI libs: As far as I can see the RTI c++ interface is defined

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] Dynamic plug-in interface for I/Omodules

2009-07-01 Thread Petr Gotthard
Hi, I'm (still) against binary runtime modules for FlightGear. And I respect that. We offer more possibilities than X-plane and MSFS and all the others put together -- by letting people look at/modify/redistribute our source code. For free. That's very generous, if you ask me. Yes, that is