[fltk.development] New unittest app suggestion -- RFC

2009-02-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
I think the browser idea might be a bit clearer and easier to navigate, so that it's always clear what all the tests are by name, and both keyboard or mouse could navigate the tests consistently. (The browser would simply remain up while one cycles through the tests.)

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: STR #1306: automated safe widget deletion inside the library

2009-02-12 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
[ Top-posting intentionally ] After all the feedback we got, I summarize: Fl_Smart_Pointer should not be used, because its name could be mistaken for something that is different. Fl_Widget_Guard should not be used either for similar reasons. Our best bet would be Fl_Widget_Tracker, and this

Re: [fltk.development] New unittest app suggestion -- RFC

2009-02-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
matthiasm wrote: No, you guys are correct. Very nice, thank you! Fixed; changed touched - overwritten. Ian, also added a few more extents tests mainly out of curiosity.. I wanted to see what `, -, and _ looked like, as well as some separate text with