imacarthur wrote:
how did I get it to compile on my non-XFT test setup?
I need to go back over that build and see what I actually did compile.
I was wondering that myself..
I just now compiled that same snapshot on my more recent fedora3
machine with xft disabled
I remembered an early discussion where someone made
a point whether it should take a single character
or a string.
OK - I went for a string. I reckon an individual character is just a
short string anyway!
SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited
Registered Office: Sigma House,
All,
How do people feel about my fl_text_extents patch (STR #2076)?
I don't know how to get something new like that added to the API.
This change is very useful, to me, so I'd very much like to push it into
the source, but how do I get agreement for that?
Is the proposed API acceptable? Does it
MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote:
How do people feel about my fl_text_extents patch (STR #2076)?
Offhand I'm not familiar with the difference between a
typographical bounding box and a minimal bounding box.
It's probably obvious, and I haven't had my coffee yet.
On 18 Nov 2008, at 19:00, Torsten Giebl wrote:
I would like to have something like this but one that accepts a String
and gives back the minimum width and - height.
Torsten, can you expand on this?
I am not sure I understand what you are asking - is this not what my
fl_text_extents
imacarthur wrote:
On 18 Nov 2008, at 19:00, Torsten Giebl wrote:
I would like to have something like this but one that accepts a String
and gives back the minimum width and - height.
Torsten, can you expand on this?
I am not sure I understand what you are asking - is this not what my
Hello !
Ya, Torsten, I'm thinking Ian's proposed function does
exactly what you're asking for.
Then i am 100% with you.
I remembered an early discussion where someone made
a point whether it should take a single character
or a string.
CU
