Re: [fltk.development] New unittest app suggestion -- RFC

2009-04-02 Thread Greg Ercolano
Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Greg Ercolano wrote: Ian, also added a few more extents tests mainly out of curiosity.. I wanted to see what `, -, and _ looked like, as well as some separate text with descenders (gjpq). I basically made a subroutine out of the

Re: [fltk.development] New unittest app suggestion -- RFC

2009-04-02 Thread Greg Ercolano
Greg Ercolano wrote: Albrecht: I've applied your patch, and since there was a general consensus of 'go ahead and check it in', I'm going to check it in as the new unittests.cxx program to replace the old, as soon as I verify it on linux/osx/windows. Oops, after checking it

[fltk.development] New unittest app suggestion -- RFC

2009-02-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
I think the browser idea might be a bit clearer and easier to navigate, so that it's always clear what all the tests are by name, and both keyboard or mouse could navigate the tests consistently. (The browser would simply remain up while one cycles through the tests.)

Re: [fltk.development] New unittest app suggestion -- RFC

2009-02-12 Thread Greg Ercolano
matthiasm wrote: No, you guys are correct. Very nice, thank you! Fixed; changed touched - overwritten. Ian, also added a few more extents tests mainly out of curiosity.. I wanted to see what `, -, and _ looked like, as well as some separate text with