Re: FLUXLIST: Re: On the disagreement

2006-07-19 Thread clifford
this is really reminds me of the old hat about what is dada and who is dada. history repeating its dada. why not be a flux ? flux away!cheers!On 19/07/06, Madawg Painterofdark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It baffles me.. why one would feel that they> need/want/deserve/feel> in-titled to the fluxus

Re: FLUXLIST: Re: On the disagreement

2006-07-19 Thread Madawg Painterofdark
> It baffles me.. why one would feel that they > need/want/deserve/feel > in-titled to the fluxus label on their work or > selves. > David Why in the heck not put the label of Fluxus on your work if you want to. By saying that it's this or that limits it. The whole point is that it's free (at l

RE: FLUXLIST: Re: On the disagreement

2006-07-18 Thread Don Boyd
Is this "The" David, Allan? -Don ( I'm sorry Fluxlisters. I've been gone five days and reading my 200 plus emails, 10 of which might be relevant. Perhaps I should go to page 15 first?) http://www.donaldboyd.blogspot.com/ http://fluxuswest.blogspot.com/ http://fluxusmuseum.blogspot.com/

RE: FLUXLIST: Re: On the disagreement

2006-07-17 Thread Allan Revich
There really is no special reason that one should "feel that they need/want/deserve/feel in-titled to the fluxus label on their work or selves". But there is also no special reason that should prevent one using the label either. Like all labels, the Fluxus label can potentially supply information a